Peer-Coaching for Family Physicians to Close the Intention-to-Action Gap

References

1. 1.↵
   Able to get same-day or next-day appointment when sick, selected health & system statistics. The Commonwealth Fund. Available at: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/system-stats/same-day-or-next-day-appointment. Published 2020. Accessed May 10, 2023.
2. 2.↵
   How Canada Compares: Results from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2020 International Health Policy Survey of the General Population in 11 Countries. Ottawa, ON. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Available at: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/how-canada-compares-cmwf-survey-2020-chartbook-en.pdf. Published 2021. Accessed May 10, 2023.
3. 3.↵
   1. Lofters AK,
   2. Mark A,
   3. Taljaard M,
   4. Green ME,
   5. Glazier RH,
   6. Dahrouge S

   . Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada. BMC Fam Pract 2018;19:147.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Morley CP,
   2. Schad LA,
   3. Tumiel-Berhalter LM,
   4. et al

   . Improving cancer screening rates in primary care via practice facilitation and academic detailing: a multi-PBRN quality improvement project. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2021;8:315–22.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   Setting the Target for Improving Heart Health in America. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/evidencenow/research-results/results/infographics/baseline.html. Published last reviewed August 2018. Accessed May 10, 2023.
6. 6.↵
   1. Tu JV,
   2. Chu A,
   3. Maclagan L

   , Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART)et al. Regional variations in ambulatory care and incidence of cardiovascular events. CMAJ. 2017;189:E494–E501.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Ivers N,
   2. Jamtvedt G,
   3. Flottorp S,
   4. et al

   . Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;Cd000259.
8. 8.↵
   1. Brehaut JC,
   2. Colquhoun HL,
   3. Eva KW,
   4. et al

   . Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:435–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Desveaux L,
   2. Ivers NM,
   3. Devotta K,
   4. Ramji N,
   5. Weyman K,
   6. Kiran T

   . Unpacking the intention to action gap: a qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback. Implement Sci 2021;16:19.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. MacKenzie C,
    2. Chan TM,
    3. Mondoux S

    . Clinical improvement interventions for residents and practicing physicians: a scoping review of coaching and mentoring for practice improvement. AEM Educ Train 2019;3:353–64.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Sharieff GQ

    . MD to MD coaching: improving physician-patient experience scores: what works, what doesn't. J Patient Exp 2017;4:210–2.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Curran V,
    2. Fleet L,
    3. Whitton C

    . Fostering “reflection-on-practice” through a multisource feedback and peer coaching pilot program. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2022.
13. 13.↵
    1. Kiran T,
    2. Ramji N,
    3. Derocher MB,
    4. Girdhari R,
    5. Davie S,
    6. Lam-Antoniades M

    . Ten tips for advancing a culture of improvement in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2019;28:582–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Sargeant J,
    2. Lockyer J,
    3. Mann K,
    4. et al

    . Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med 2015;90:1698–706.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    How to Improve. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Available at: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx. Accessed September 27, 2023.
16. 16.↵
    1. Brown B,
    2. Gude WT,
    3. Blakeman T,
    4. et al

    . Clinical performance feedback intervention theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Implement Sci 2019;14:40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. May C,
    2. Finch T

    . Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology 2009;43:535–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Braun V,
    2. Clarke V

    . Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 2019;11:589–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Byrne D

    . A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 2022;56:1391–412.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Kahlke R,
    2. Pratt DD,
    3. Bluman B,
    4. Overhill K,
    5. Eva KW

    . Complexities of continuing professional development in context: physician engagement in clinical coaching. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2022;42:5–13.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Roy M,
    2. Lockyer J,
    3. Touchie C

    . Family physician quality improvement plans: a realist inquiry into what works, for whom, under what circumstances. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2023;43:155–63.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Arabsky S,
    2. Castro N,
    3. Murray M,
    4. Bisca I,
    5. Eva KW

    . The influence of relationship-centered coaching on physician perceptions of peer review in the context of mandated regulatory practices. Acad Med 2020;95:S14–s19. (11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations).

    OpenUrlPubMed