Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Baden K,
   2. Driver J

   . The state abortion policy landscape one year post-Roe. Guttmacher Institute. Updated June 16, 2023. Accessed September 7, 2023. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/06/state-abortion-policy-landscape-one-year-post-roe.
2. 2.↵
   Society of Family Planning. #WeCount report. July 26, 2023. Accessed September 7, 2023. Available at: https://societyfp.org/research/wecount/.
3. 3.↵
   1. Prine LW,
   2. Lesnewski R

   . Medication abortion and family physicians’ scope of practice. J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:304–6.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Bennett IM,
   2. Baylson M,
   3. Kalkstein K,
   4. Gillespie G,
   5. Bellamy SL,
   6. Fleischman J

   . Early abortion in family medicine: clinical outcomes. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:527–33.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Godfrey EM,
   2. Fiastro AE,
   3. Jacob-Files EA,
   4. et al

   . Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings. Contraception 2021;104:82–91.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Dunlop H,
   2. Sinay A,
   3. Kerestes C

   . Telemedicine abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023;66:725–38.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Thompson KMJ,
   2. Sturrock HJW,
   3. Foster DG,
   4. Upadhyay UD

   . Association of travel distance to nearest abortion facility with rates of abortion. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2115530.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Razon N,
   2. Wulf S,
   3. Perez C,
   4. et al

   . Family physicians’ barriers and facilitators in incorporating medication abortion. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:579–87.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Razon N,
   2. Wulf S,
   3. Perez C,
   4. et al

   . Exploring the impact of mifepristone's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) on the integration of medication abortion into US family medicine primary care clinics. Contraception 2022;109:19–24.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Carson A,
    2. Paynter M,
    3. Norman W,
    4. Cameron E,
    5. Martin-Misener R,
    6. Munro S

    . Medication abortion and nurse practitioner practice in Canada: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 2022;20:2799.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Munro S,
    2. Guilbert E,
    3. Wagner M-S,
    4. et al

    . Perspectives among Canadian physicians on factors influencing implementation of mifepristone medical abortion: a national qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:413–21.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Summit AK,
    2. Lague I,
    3. Dettmann M,
    4. Gold M

    . Barriers to and enablers of abortion provision for family physicians trained in abortion during residency. Perspect Sex Repro H 2020;52:151–9.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Hart E

    . District court rules numerous Minnesota abortion restrictions unconstitutional. Unrestrict Minnesota. No date. Accessed September 7, 2023. Available at: unrestrictmn.org/news/district-court-rules-numerous-Minnesota-abortion-restrictions-unconstitutional/.
14. 14.↵
    1. Egbert A,
    2. Brower S

    . Greater Minnesota: redefined and revisited. Minnesota State Demographic Center. January 2017. Accessed September 7, 2023. Available at: https://mn.gov/admin/assets/greater-mn-refined-and-revisited-msdc-jan2017_tcm36-273216.pdf.
15. 15.↵
    1. Ross MW,
    2. Leshabari S,
    3. Rosser BRS,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of an assessment instrument for a sexual health curriculum for nurses and midwifery students in Tanzania: the Sexual Health Education for Professionals Scale (SHEPS). Appl Nurs Res 2018;40:152–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Hsieh HF,
    2. Shannon SE

    . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Restar A,
    2. Jin H,
    3. Operario D

    . Gender-inclusive and gender-specific approaches in trans health research. Transgend Health 2021;6:235–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Cohen J

    . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
19. 19.↵
    1. Solberg L

    . Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:251–6.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Miech EJ,
    2. Rattray NA,
    3. Flanagan ME,
    4. Damschroder L,
    5. Schmid AA,
    6. Damush TM

    . Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med 2018;6:2050312118773261.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    Reproductive Health Access Project. Programs. 2024. Accessed February 18, 2024. Available at: https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/programs/.
22. 22.↵
    1. Wu L,
    2. Nutting K,
    3. Harriett L,
    4. McHugh A,
    5. Janiak E,
    6. Stulberg DB

    . ExPAND Mifepristone: medical management of miscarriage and abortion in FQHCs. Ann Fam Med 2023;21:468.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Wulf S,
    2. Carvajal DN,
    3. Razon N,
    4. et al

    . “They go hand in hand”: perspectives on the relationship between the core values of family medicine and abortion provision among family physicians who do not oppose abortion. J Am Board Fam Med 2023;6:583–90.

    OpenUrl