Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care

Allison M. Cole, Gina A. Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden and Michael Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2024, 37 (3) 444-454; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1
Allison M. Cole
From the Institute of Translational Health Sciences (AMC, GAP, L-MB, MP); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AMC, GAP, L-MB); Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute (EH, MP).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gina A. Keppel
From the Institute of Translational Health Sciences (AMC, GAP, L-MB, MP); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AMC, GAP, L-MB); Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute (EH, MP).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura-Mae Baldwin
From the Institute of Translational Health Sciences (AMC, GAP, L-MB, MP); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AMC, GAP, L-MB); Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute (EH, MP).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Holden
From the Institute of Translational Health Sciences (AMC, GAP, L-MB, MP); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AMC, GAP, L-MB); Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute (EH, MP).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Parchman
From the Institute of Translational Health Sciences (AMC, GAP, L-MB, MP); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (AMC, GAP, L-MB); Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute (EH, MP).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Primary Care Practices Included in Analysis

    CharacteristicsStudy Practices
    N = 44
    Coaching organization, n (%)
     Qualis Health23 (52.3%)
     Oregon Rural Practice and Research Network (ORPRN)21 (47.7%)
    Location, n (%)
     Rural21 (47.7%)
     Urban23 (52.3%)
    Number of clinicians, n (%)
     One (solo)8 (18.2%)
     2 to 522 (50.0%)
     6 or more14 (31.8%)
    Average panel size for full-time clinician, median (IQR)1,000
    Number of patient visits per week at practice, median (IQR)140
    Organizational type, n (%)
     Federally Qualified Health Center8 (18.2%)
     Health/Hospital system14 (31.8%)
     Indian Health Service/Tribal Organization0 (0.0%)
     Independent22 (50.0%)
    Specialty, n (%)
     Family Medicine39 (88.6%)
     Internal Medicine1 (2.3%)
     Mixed4 (9.1%)
    • Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Implementation Strategies Used by Practice Facilitators with Primary Care Practices

    Percent of practices with which practice facilitators used the strategy (n = 44)
    Implementation StrategyAt Least Once During the StudyQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5
    Commonly Used (Present in > 80% of sampled practices)Develop and/or implement tools for quality monitoring100%93%93%77%63%63%
    Assess barriers that may impede implementation95%70%63%61%43%43%
    Assess for readiness or progress93%75%45%36%39%27%
    Develop and support teams91%41%52%73%49%55%
    Conduct educational meetings86%53%43%23%11%16%
    Moderately used (present in 20 to 80% of sampled practices)Use data experts75%45%50%34%30%11%
    Distribute educational materials73%30%39%34%32%23%
    Capture and share local knowledge and promote network weaving66%18%32%18%23%27%
    Identify and prepare champions61%32%20%25%9%23%
    Conduct ongoing training59%27%18%30%14%16%
    Prepare patients/consumers to be active participants45%9%16%16%20%18%
    Assess facilitators that enhance implementation36%27%9%5%0%5%
    Train for leadership32%18%7%7%5%0%
    Promote adaptability30%2%18%9%7%11%
    Rarely used (present in <20% of sampled practices)Conduct educational outreach visits14%5%5%5%0%0%
    Involve patients/consumers and family members14%9%2%0%2%2%
    Facilitate relay of clinical data to clinicians11%7%2%2%2%0%
    Remind clinicians11%0%5%9%2%0%
    Tailor strategies11%0%5%9%2%0%
    Obtain and use patients/consumers and family feedback9%7%2%2%0%2%
    Build a coalition9%0%2%0%5%2%
    Identify early adopters7%5%2%5%0%0%
    Develop/use a formal implementation blueprint7%2%2%0%0%2%
    Audit and provide feedback7%0%5%2%2%0%
    Make training dynamic2%2%0%0%2%0%
    Inform local opinion leaders2%0%0%0%0%2%
    • * Present in the first five quarters, for practices with data in the first five quarters of the Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) study.

    • View popup
    Appendix Table 1.

    Implementation Strategies Enacted by Practice Facilitators and Representative Quotes

    Implementation StrategyPercentage of Practices with Which the Implementation Strategy Was Used at Least Once During the StudyRepresentative Quote
    Commonly Used (Present in > 80% of sampled practices)Develop and/or implement tools for quality monitoring100%“Meeting to demo proposed changes to the data visualization in [the data dashboard] and ask for feedback.” (139:1)
    Assess barriers that may impede implementation95%“The group, particularly [NAME], is perseverating on the data for [the outcomes].They still haven’t shared it with us, stating it’s not accurate yet. [NAME2] and I have attempted to allay concern, but with little effect as of yet. The problem is that without the data, it’s prevented them from actualizing concrete ideas for addressing the [the outcomes]. Right now, we’re skirting the high leverage changes, which is definitely a good thing, but we’ve yet to relate them to the [the outcomes] specifically. I am hoping that by the next meeting we can make some moves on the measures.” (133:2)
    Assess for readiness or progress93%“They have made clear progress and completed tasks that are building their foundation to make thoughtful change.” (131:2)
    Develop and support teams91%“Clinicians are engaged and have a desire to keep moving with embedding QI into their practice framework. They have acknowledged they can incorporate other staff members of the practice to be included in this work and learn QI techniques, to help keep this infrastructure in place after the Practice Coach has completed this project with them. We will start including the Office Manager.” (215:2)
    Conduct educational meetings86%“We discussed the data and perception of the data and how the clinics will use it to plan their model for improvement” (952:1)
    Distribute educational materials73%“[NAME] to send the QI team the [outcomes] clinical evidence one-pagers once they are finalized.” (131:4)
    Capture and share local knowledge and promote network weaving66%“I did share the tobacco-free readiness assessment that another practice of mine developed.” (135:8)
    Identify and prepare champions61%“Considering needing a champion…[Doctor]. could be the person. She has shown great team spirit and initiative since arriving recently at [clinic] and is well liked and respected by peers.” (621:10)
    Conduct ongoing training59%[NAME] and I will be doing a presentation on PDSA to the managers in the next couple of weeks.” (948:2)
    Prepare patients/consumers to be active participants45%“We talked about how we could get patients thinking about lifestyle changes and how they may impact their [blood pressure] before meeting with the [clinician].” (137:7)
    Assess facilitators that enhance implementation36%“Practice has a strong QI team and leadership support…. they have completed the integration of mental health and primary care successfully--strong in house cross functional team support with a focus on patient self-management, personal goal setting and motivational therapy.” (784:4)
    Train for leadership32%“Facilitated a conversation with CEO regarding the loss of their QI manager and H2N. [NAME] decided to form a new QIC (Quality Improvement Committee) and add H2N to its ongoing agenda.” (527:3)
    Promote adaptability30%“The team needs to address time limitations and rework their goals to be more aligned. We took the remaining duration of this meeting to discuss how that will look and plan out [hypertension] next steps.” (168:5)
    Rarely used (present in <20% of sampled practices)Conduct educational outreach visits14%On [Date, experts] will co-host a conference call with experts and a few other clinicians like you with whom we have had these [cardiovascular disease] risk calculator discussions.” (540:3).
    Involve patients/consumers and family members14%“Have three patients interested in inviting to the team. There are benefits to having patient involvement earlier in the QI process. Will consider inviting them to begin participating in March.” (152:4)
    Facilitate relay of clinical data to clinicians11%“[NAME] will send out dashboards to clinicians at least a couple days in advance to allow them to reflect and digest the information and formulate questions/concerns, etc. in preparation for the clinician meeting.” (131:8)
    Remind clinicians11%“[NAME] has put sticky notes on each clinician’s computer reminding them to use the health maintenance area within the [electronic health record] because people are often just clicking through without documenting the work that they are doing around these measures.” (687:7)
    Tailor strategies11%“They are addressing the smoking measure by adding a full stand-alone sheet of tobacco related questions that align with their [electronic health record] entry… We dove in to talking about the advantages of the tobacco use form and how it can streamline clinician time in finding and addressing patients that actually are interested in quitting or talking about alternatives. It could also prompt scheduling a specific appointment to address cessation separate from their acute issue. We spoke about rolling this form out sooner than [date].” (557:10)
    Obtain and use patients/consumers and family feedback9%“[NAME] brought up that several patients cannot afford their medications and she would like to somehow build questions into visits surrounding determining if patients can afford what they are prescribed, in a sensitive way.” (582:6)
    Build a coalition9%“We spent the whole hour going over their QI plan and developing a new structure that would fit their current needs. They decided to have the [quality improvement] and [quality assurance] committees separate, but that they would report to each other quarterly on items that have cross over.” (1213:2)
    Identify early adopters7%“Per [NAME] this is a huge part of how he orients his practice. He tries diligently to ensure this is done. This may vary across clinicians. I asked if we could discuss further how he does this so well with his patients at a later time. This could be very valuable info to spread across the practice.” (129:10)
    Develop/use a formal implementation blueprint7%“First visit was consensus discussion and overview, second visit was building foundation for cross-sectional [quality improvement], and by the third visit we hope to review data together.” (1240:4)
    Audit and provide feedback7%“Action: Audit 10 to 15 patient charts from the list 94 current smokers. Look to see if any smoking cessation counseling has been documented (this will help us determine if the documentation is being lost in the text/ is not in a field that the [electronic health record] can pull a report from)” (554:3)
    Make training dynamic2%“[NAME] suggested using a delayed staff message that shows up on the day a patient is coming in and alerts the clinician to discuss the issue of importance. [NAME] has had success with this method, so [NAME2] wants to try it out and tweak as necessary.” (917:2)
    Inform local opinion leaders2%“They also talked about identifying clinicians that are a problem and reaching out from clinician to clinician or owner to owner to try and resolve the issue.” (744:5)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family   Medicine: 37 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May-June 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care
Allison M. Cole, Gina A. Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden, Michael Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2024, 37 (3) 444-454; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care
Allison M. Cole, Gina A. Keppel, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Erika Holden, Michael Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2024, 37 (3) 444-454; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230312R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Limitations
    • Discussion
    • Implications
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix.
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical and Practice Innovation Improving the Practice of Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular Risk Factors
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Implementation Science
  • Primary Health Care
  • Quality Improvement

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire