Brief ReportBrief Report

Telehealth Medication Abortion in Primary Care: A Comparison to Usual in-Clinic Care

Silpa Srinivasulu, Deyang Nyandak, Anna E. Fiastro, Honor MacNaughton, Amy Tressan and Emily M. Godfrey
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2024, 37 (2) 295-302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230178R1

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. McCann A,
    2. Schoenfeld Walker A,
    3. Sasani A,
    4. Johnston T,
    5. Buchanan L,
    6. Huang J
    . Tracking the states where abortion is now banned. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html. Published April 14, 2023. Accessed April 16, 2023.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kirstein M,
    2. Dreweke J,
    3. Jones RK,
    4. Philbin J
    . 100 days post-Roe: at least 66 clinics across 15 US states have stopped offering abortion care.; 2022. Accessed November 4, 2022. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/2022/10/100-days-post-roe-least-66-clinics-across-15-us-states-have-stopped-offering-abortion-care.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Grossman D,
    2. White K,
    3. Hopkins K,
    4. Potter JE
    . Change in distance to nearest facility and abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014. JAMA 2017;317:437–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. White K,
    2. deMartelly V,
    3. Grossman D,
    4. Turan JM
    . experiences accessing abortion care in Alabama among women traveling for services. Womens Health Issues 2016;26:298–304.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gerdts C,
    2. Fuentes L,
    3. Grossman D,
    4. et al
    . Impact of clinic closures on women obtaining abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. Am J Public Health 2022;106:857–64.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Singer MR,
    2. Bartz D,
    3. Pace LE
    . The role of primary care clinicians in protecting access to abortion services. JAMA Intern Med 2022;182:897–8.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Thompson KMJ,
    2. Sturrock HJW,
    3. Foster DG,
    4. Upadhyay UD
    . Association of travel distance to nearest abortion facility with rates of abortion. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2115530.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Patel P,
    2. Narayana S,
    3. Thill Z,
    4. Gold M,
    5. Paul A
    . Family physicians’ role in simplifying medication abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S33–S36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Beaman J,
    2. Prifti C,
    3. Schwarz EB,
    4. Sobota M
    . Medication to manage abortion and miscarriage. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:2398–405.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Weitz TA,
    2. Taylor D,
    3. Desai S,
    4. et al
    . Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver. Am J Public Health 2013;103:454–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Prine LW,
    2. Lesnewski R
    . Medication abortion and family physicians’ scope of practice. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:304–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Amico JR,
    2. Cheng TL,
    3. Godfrey EM
    . Providing abortion services in the primary care Setting. Prim Care 2018;45:599–613.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S., Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States. National Academies Press; 2018:24950.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rubin SE,
    2. Godfrey E,
    3. Gold M
    . Patient attitudes toward early abortion services in the family medicine clinic. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:162–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wu JP,
    2. Godfrey EM,
    3. Prine L,
    4. Andersen KL,
    5. MacNaughton H,
    6. Gold M
    . Women’s satisfaction with abortion care in academic family medicine centers. Fam Med 2015;47:98–106.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Patel P,
    2. Narayana S,
    3. Summit A,
    4. et al
    . Abortion provision among recently graduated family physicians. Fam Med 2020;52:724–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Will 1999 be the year for Mifepristone (Ru-486)? And, an update on women’s other options for very early abortion. Kaiser Family Foundation; 1998. Available at: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/will-1999-be-the-year-for-mifepristone/.
  18. 18.↵
    Questions and answers on Mifepristone for medical termination of pregnancy through ten weeks gestation. US Food and Drug Administration. Published January 4, 2023. Accessed January 28, 2023. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cortez C,
    2. Mansour O,
    3. Qato DM,
    4. Stafford RS,
    5. Alexander GC
    . Changes in short-term, long-term, and preventive care delivery in US office-based and telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Health Forum 2021;2:e211529.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Godfrey EM,
    2. Fiastro AE,
    3. Jacob-Files EA,
    4. et al
    . Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings. Contraception 2021;104:82–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Raymond EG,
    2. Grossman D,
    3. Mark A,
    4. et al
    . Commentary: no-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond. Contraception 2020;101:361–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Summit AK,
    2. Lague I,
    3. Dettmann M,
    4. Gold M
    . Barriers to and enablers of abortion provision for family physicians trained in abortion during residency. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2020;52:151–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Razon N,
    2. Wulf S,
    3. Perez C,
    4. et al
    . Exploring the impact of mifepristone’s risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) on the integration of medication abortion into US family medicine primary care clinics. Contraception 2022;109:19–24.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Anderson E,
    2. Salganicoff A,
    3. Sobel L
    . State restrictions on telehealth abortion. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2021. Available at: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/slide/state-restrictions-on-telehealth-abortion/.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Clare CA
    . Telehealth and the digital divide as a social determinant of health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform 2021;10:26.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Parnell AM,
    2. Rodgers JL
    . Seasonality of induced abortion in North Carolina. J Biosoc Sci 1998;30:321–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Franklin TE,
    2. Theisen G,
    3. Salyer CV,
    4. Pinkston C,
    5. Gunaratnam B
    . The seasonality of abortion in Kentucky. Contraception 2017;95:181–5.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Boyd RW,
    2. Lindo EG,
    3. Weeks LD,
    4. McLemore MR
    . On racism: a new standard for publishing on racial health inequities. Health Aff Blog 2020. Published online July 2.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jones RK,
    2. Jerman J
    . Time to appointment and delays in accessing care among U.S. abortion patients. Guttmacher Institute; 2016. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/delays-in-accessing-care-among-us-abortion-patients.
  30. 30.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Six domains of health care quality. Published November 2018. Accessed June 5, 2022. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/measures/six-domains.html.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Dennis A,
    2. Blanchard K,
    3. Bessenaar T
    . Identifying indicators for quality abortion care: a systematic literature review. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2017;43:7–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    #WeCount Report April to December 2022 Findings. Society of Family Planning; 2023. Available at: https://societyfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/WeCountReport_April2023Release.pdf.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Maddow-Zimet I,
    2. Kost K
    . Even before Roe was overturned, nearly one in 10 people obtaining an abortion traveled across state lines for care. Guttmacher Institute Accessed November 16, 2022. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/07/even-roe-was-overturned-nearly-one-10-people-obtaining-abortion-traveled-across.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Upadhyay UD,
    2. Desai S,
    3. Zlidar V,
    4. et al
    . Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:175–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lindo J,
    2. Pineda-Torres M
    . New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion. J Health Econ 2021. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Prine L,
    2. Shannon C,
    3. Gillespie G,
    4. et al
    . Medical abortion: outcomes in a family medicine setting. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:509–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Bennett IM,
    2. Baylson M,
    3. Kalkstein K,
    4. Gillespie G,
    5. Bellamy SL,
    6. Fleischman J
    . Early abortion in family medicine: clinical outcomes. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:527–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Godfrey EM,
    2. Bordoloi A,
    3. Moorthie M,
    4. Pela E
    . Medication abortion within a student health care clinic: a review of the first 46 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Health 2012;60:178–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Redd SK,
    2. Rice WS,
    3. Aswani MS,
    4. et al
    . Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:1139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Eberly LA,
    2. Kallan MJ,
    3. Julien HM,
    4. et al
    . Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine access for primary and specialty ambulatory care during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2031640.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Payán DD,
    2. Frehn JL,
    3. Garcia L,
    4. Tierney AA,
    5. Rodriguez HP
    . Telemedicine implementation and use in community health centers during COVID-19: Clinic personnel and patient perspectives. SSM Qual Res Health 2022;2:100054.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Adepoju OE,
    2. Chae M,
    3. Ojinnaka CO,
    4. Shetty S,
    5. Angelocci T
    . Utilization gaps during the COVID-19 pandemic: racial and ethnic disparities in telemedicine uptake in federally qualified health center clinics. J Gen Intern Med 2022;37:1191–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    Center for Reproductive Rights. Alliance for Hippocratic medicine v. FDA. 2023. Available at: https://reproductiverights.org/case/alliance-for-hippocratic-medicine-v-fda/.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Johnson DM,
    2. Michels-Gualtieri M,
    3. Gomperts R,
    4. Aiken ARA
    . Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2023;55:4–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords