Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleResearch Letter

Considering the Environmental Impact of Practice-Based Research

Ben Webel, Gabriela Villalobos, Michelle S. Rockwell, Alison Huffstetler, Jacqueline B. Britz, E. Marshall Brooks and Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2024, 37 (1) 22-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230202R1
Ben Webel
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriela Villalobos
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle S. Rockwell
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
PhD, RD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Huffstetler
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline B. Britz
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Marshall Brooks
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex H. Krist
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (BW, GV, AH, JBB, EMB, AHK); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (MSR).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) improve primary care by addressing issues that matter to clinicians. Building trust between researchers and care teams is essential to this process, which often requires visiting practices to cultivate relationships and perform research activities. However, in a recent study using practice facilitation to improve the delivery of a preventive service, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted us to convert all planned facilitation from an in-person to virtual format. This eliminated the need to commute by automobile to and from practices across the state, greatly reducing the carbon footprint of the study.

Methods: From practice facilitator field notes that detailed practice locations and number of sessions, we calculated the total number of driving miles averted by virtual facilitation. We then determined metric tons of carbon dioxide we avoided producing using the Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator. During post-intervention interviews, we assessed practices’ perspectives and experiences with the virtual format.

Results: Three practice facilitators provided an average of 3.4 sessions for 64 practices. Virtual facilitation averted 32,574.8 drive miles and prevented the release of 12.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide, an offset equivalent to growing 210 trees for 10 years. Practices reported that virtual facilitation fostered greater engagement and allowed more clinicians and staff to attend sessions.

Discussion: Climate change poses a significant threat to the health of people and communities. Given their commitment to improving population health, it may be time for PBRNs to routinely assess their environmental impact and minimize preventable environmental costs.

  • Climate Change
  • Population Health
  • Practice-based Research
  • Practice-based Research Networks

Introduction

Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) connect researchers, clinicians, patients, and communities to create real-world laboratories that study topics important to primary care. Practice-based research is grounded in longitudinal trusting relationships. Historically this has been achieved with “windshield time”—driving to visit practices, meet clinicians and staff, understand needs and context, and complete research tasks such as workflow coaching, data collection, and electronic health record support.1 The COVID-19 pandemic required a major shift in the conduct of PBRN research, abandoning windshield time, converting to virtual formats, and rethinking how to build partnerships.

In January 2020, our research team started recruiting for a traditional practice facilitation study to implement US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on alcohol screening, including traditional in-person recruitment.2 The protocol was previously published.3 We planned to recruit 125 primary care practices throughout Virginia and host up to 7 in-person training sessions apiece. The pandemic precluded in-person practice visits and as health care moved toward a virtual approach, we made a similar transition.

Concurrently, there is a growing body of evidence revealing climate change as a major threat to health. While PBRNs have begun studying the intersection of health and climate change, their own contribution to climate change as a by-product of conducting research has not been a core consideration. This manuscript reports on the carbon emission savings of replacing in-person with virtual practice facilitation.

Methods

Using a structured template to systematically capture data elements, practice facilitators kept detailed field notes for each training session including attendees, type of interaction, purpose, progress, challenges, and outcomes.3 For each session held virtually, we calculated round-trip distance from facilitator address to practice address for estimated miles that facilitators would have driven given in-person sessions. Total mileage was converted to metric tons of carbon dioxide using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator.4 In field notes and postintervention interviews, we assessed practice engagement including use of virtual formats.

Results

Of the 76 practices enrolled, 64 completed all sessions. Between September 2020 and May 2023, facilitators delivered 216 sessions at an average of 3.4 per practice and 190 (88%) were virtual. Facilitators often conducted several sessions per day with different practices, which would not have been feasible in person. Out of 64 practices, 62 made positive statements about using the virtual format for practice facilitation.

The virtual format saved practice facilitators from driving 32,574.8 miles, which would have released 12.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide. Per the EPA calculator,5 this is equivalent to 1,429 gallons of gasoline consumed, 1.6 homes’ energy use for a year, and 1,544,862 smartphones charged. If these sessions were conducted in person, we would have had to recycle 550 trash bags of waste instead of using a landfill, switch 481 incandescent bulbs to LED, plant and grow 210 trees for 10 years, or support 15.1 acres of forest for 1 year to offset the carbon dioxide (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Greenhouse gas equivalencies for carbon dioxide production prevented by virtual practice facilitation.

Discussion

The use of virtual practice facilitation fostered high study engagement while saving over 12 metric tons of carbon emissions. In addition, the virtual format potentially led to more extensive and meaningful practice engagement due to more flexible scheduling and the ability to digitally disseminate study materials. Keeping in mind the importance of fostering trust between PBRNs and practices, a hybrid model with at least 1 face-to-face meeting may be most effective. Further research is needed to understand the appropriate balance of in-person and virtual facilitation. The environmental impact of conducting practice-based research is not often considered, despite the significant environmental costs of driving to practices, printing and mailing surveys and research materials, wasting leftover food after meetings, use of electricity for maintaining servers and web sites, and more. Family medicine educators have started studying how their field can and should address climate change through training of future family physicians, interaction with patients, practice transformation such as enhanced telehealth services, and local and national advocacy.6 While research will never have zero environmental cost, PBRNs have a responsibility to routinely assess the impact of these activities and minimize preventable environmental costs.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: This work was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1R18HS027077) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR002649).

  • Conflict of interest: Dr. Krist served on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for the 2020 Recommendation for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Adolescents and Adults: Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions Recommendation. No other conflicts of interest declared.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/37/1/22.full.

  • Received for publication May 25, 2023.
  • Revision received October 24, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication October 25, 2023.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L
    . Practice-based research—“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Curry SJ,
    2. Krist AH,
    3. Owens DK
    , US Preventive Services Task Forceet al. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2018;320:1899–909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Huffstetler AN,
    2. Kuzel AJ,
    3. Sabo RT,
    4. et al
    . Practice facilitation to promote evidence-based screening and management of unhealthy alcohol use in primary care: a practice-level randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:93.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator—Calculations and References. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Updated April 4, 2023. Accessed May 23, 2023. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references.
  5. 5.↵
    Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Updated April 4, 2023. Accessed May 23, 2023. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator.
  6. 6.↵
    1. DeMasi M,
    2. Chekuri B,
    3. Paladine HL,
    4. Kenyon T
    . Climate change: a crisis for family medicine educators. Fam Med 2022;54:683–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 1
January-February 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Considering the Environmental Impact of Practice-Based Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Considering the Environmental Impact of Practice-Based Research
Ben Webel, Gabriela Villalobos, Michelle S. Rockwell, Alison Huffstetler, Jacqueline B. Britz, E. Marshall Brooks, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 37 (1) 22-24; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230202R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Considering the Environmental Impact of Practice-Based Research
Ben Webel, Gabriela Villalobos, Michelle S. Rockwell, Alison Huffstetler, Jacqueline B. Britz, E. Marshall Brooks, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 37 (1) 22-24; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230202R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Focus on Climate Change and How It Impacts Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing of Certification Stage Completion Associated with Subsequent Certification Exam Outcomes Among Board-Certified Family Physicians
  • Interpersonal Continuity of Care May Help Delay Progression to Type 2 Diabetes
  • Impact of Point of Care Hemoglobin A1c Testing on Time to Therapeutic Intervention
Show more Research Letter

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Climate Change
  • Population Health
  • Practice-based Research
  • Practice-Based Research Networks

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire