Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticlePriority Updates from the Research Literature (PURLs)

Less Is More: Backing off Sliding Scale Insulin for Hospitalized Patients

Lakshmi Karra, Roxanne Radi, Corey Lyon and Jennie B. Jarrett
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2024, 37 (1) 150-152; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230349R1
Lakshmi Karra
From the Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, CO (LK, RR); University of Colorado FMR, Denver, CO (CL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roxanne Radi
From the Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, CO (LK, RR); University of Colorado FMR, Denver, CO (CL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey Lyon
From the Denver Health Hospital Authority, Denver, CO (LK, RR); University of Colorado FMR, Denver, CO (CL).
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennie B. Jarrett
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
PharmD, BCPS, MMedEd, FCCP
Roles: Editor:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a less aggressive supplemental insulin regimen is noninferior to a standard, more aggressive, supplemental regimen.

  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
  • Hospitalization
  • Sliding Scale Insulin

Strength of Recommendation

B: Based on a single randomized controlled trial.1

Illustrative Case

A 58-year-old female patient with a known history of well-controlled diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) on metformin and long-acting insulin is admitted to your inpatient service for community-acquired pneumonia. Glucose level at admission is 160 mg/dL. Since admission to the hospital, her home antidiabetic medications are held and she is started on a standard basal-bolus insulin regimen with supplemental sliding scale insulin. On hospital day 2, the patient reports that she does not like mealtime injections and feels that she is being stuck all day. The patient wants to know if she really needs the supplemental sliding scale insulin while hospitalized.

Clinical Context

Treating hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting is known to be an important factor in decreasing in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and other clinical outcomes such as surgical site infections and delayed wound healing.2,3 With the global burden of T2DM rising, this is an increasingly common component of inpatient medical management.4 For noncritically hospitalized patients with known T2DM, current American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines recommend an insulin regimen with basal, bolus (also known as prandial), and correction components (Grade A recommendation).5 This correction component is also commonly known as supplemental sliding-scale insulin (SSI). The ADA’s insulin regimen recommendations are adapted from principles of outpatient treatment of type 1 diabetes; however, it is unclear whether this is the optimal regimen when extrapolated to T2DM physiology. Use of SSI significantly increases treatment burden for hospitalized patients and nursing staff, involving multiple point-of-care blood glucose checks and rapid-acting insulin administrations. Formative studies on basal-bolus insulin regimens used a threshold blood glucose (BG) level of 140 mg/dL, above which SSI was initiated, though studies to determine if this is the most appropriate lower BG limit do not currently exist.

The authors of this study previously showed that less aggressive SSI for noncritically ill patients with T2DM did not change fasting glucose or mean daily glucose levels.6 These less aggressive regimens, generally defined as higher BG thresholds for treatment, reduce treatment burden and iatrogenic hypoglycemia. However, to this point, there has been no randomized level evidence evaluating less aggressive SSI regimens. This study sought to compare more aggressive SSI regimens with less aggressive SSIs in hospitalized patients on basal-bolus insulin regimens. The implications of this study may provide a significant reduction in treatment burden without a detrimental effect on clinical outcomes.

Methods

This article was identified as a potential PURL through the standard systematic methodology7. An additional literature search was conducted by searching DynaMed, UpToDate, and PubMed with the terms “sliding scale insulin AND hospitalized patients” to find additional literature to place this research into the context of current clinical practice.

Study Summary

This noninferiority open-label randomized control trial evaluated the difference in mean daily BG levels in 215 nonintensive care unit hospitalized adult patients in a US teritiary medical center with T2DM with and without aggressive SSI management. Included patients had a diagnosis of T2DM for greater than 3 months and were treated with lifestyle changes, oral medications, noninsulin injectable medications, or insulin. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, admission BG >400 mg/dL, patients on glucocorticoids and those with significant renal or hepatic disease were excluded. Patients with admission glucoses of 140 to 400 mg/dL were randomized to either an intensive sliding scale (correction for BG >140 mg/dL) or nonintensive sliding scale (correction for BG >260 mg/dL) group. Basal insulin was provided for all patients; those on insulin therapy at home were given 80% of their home basal dose and those not on insulin were dosed 0.4-0.5 units/kg/day with 1 half of that dose given as the basal dose. All home medication for diabetes were held during the hospital stay. Point of care glucose was checked before meals and before bed. The primary outcome measured was the difference in mean daily BG levels. Secondary outcomes were percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia, percentage of time spent in hyperglycemia, daily total, basal, prandial, and supplemental insulin doses, and a composite of hospital complications (acute kidney injury, infection, pneumonia, and death).

Patients had a mean duration of T2DM for over 10 years, majority of patients were on home insulin (mean: 63 units/day in the intensive group, 77 units/day in the nonintensive group), and mean A1c was greater than 9%. Mean daily BG levels in the nonintensive sliding scale group were noninferior to BG in the intensive sliding scale group (intensive 172 mg/dL vs nonintensive 173 mg/dL, P = .001 for noninferiority). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in proportion of days spent at target BG or severe hypo- or hyperglycemic episodes. Fewer patients in the nonintensive group received SSI (intensive 91% vs nonintensive 34%, P < .0001). However, ultimately there was no difference in total number of SSI units administered between the 2 groups (intensive 7 units/day vs nonintensive 8 units/day, P = .34), suggesting many patients likely received low doses of insulin on the prescribed sliding scale that ultimately did not affect their overall daily glucose level. There was no difference in instances of acute kidney injury, infection, pneumonia or death between the 2 groups (composite complications: intensive = 12 vs nonintensive = 11, P = .84).

What Is New

With daily, active titration of basal-bolus insulin therapy, less aggressive SSI is not associated with worse overall glycemic control for hospitalized patients with T2DM and BG 140 to 260 mg/dL. Furthermore, there was no difference in morbidity or mortality for patients with a less aggressive SSI regimen when compared with a standard, more aggressive SSI regimen.

Caveats

This study only included noncritically ill T2DM hospitalized patients. The findings may not apply to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, admission BG >400 mg/dL, patients on glucocorticoids, geriatric patients, and those with significant renal or hepatic disease. These high-risk populations may require different cutoff thresholds and require further study. Furthermore, though continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been validated in the inpatient setting, the authors used the current standard of care, point of care (POC) checks due to availability.8 The higher sensitivity available with CGM may allow future research to determine more exact thresholds to prevent hypoglycemia and minimize treatment burden.

Challenges to Implementation

Due to the ubiquitous nature of T2DM in the population, most hospital systems have protocolized nursing orders and created institutional guidelines using BG thresholds of >140 mg/dL to trigger SSI administrations for the inpatient management of T2DM. To implement more permissive treatment thresholds may require close management by the physician and retraining and familiarizing nursing staff who may initially be uncomfortable waiting for BGs >240 mg/dL to start SSI. In larger hospital systems where endocrinologists or glucose management teams manage patients with T2DM, the primary team may not be actively managing these medications.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/37/1/150.full.

  • Received for publication September 25, 2023.
  • Revision received October 2, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication October 9, 2023.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Vellanki P,
    2. Cardona S,
    3. Galindo RJ,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy and safety of intensive versus nonintensive supplemental insulin with a basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical study. Diabetes Care 2022;45:2217–23.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Umpierrez GE,
    2. Isaacs SD,
    3. Bazargan N,
    4. You X,
    5. Thaler LM,
    6. Kitabchi AE
    . Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:978–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Umpierrez G,
    2. Smiley E,
    3. Jacobs DS,
    4. et al
    . Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery). Diabetes Care 2011;34:256–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Saeedi P,
    2. Petersohn I,
    3. Salpea P
    , IDF Diabetes Atlas Committeeet al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019;157:107843.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 16. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45:S244–S253.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Vellanki P,
    2. Bean R,
    3. Oyedokun FA,
    4. et al
    . Randomized controlled trial of insulin supplementation for correction of bedtime hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:568–574.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    The Priority Updates from the Research Literature (PURLs) Methodology. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/ebp/Documents/PURLs%20Methods%20AC.pdf.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Davis GM,
    2. Spanakis EK,
    3. Migdal AL,
    4. et al
    . Accuracy of dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2021;44:1641–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 1
January-February 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Less Is More: Backing off Sliding Scale Insulin for Hospitalized Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Less Is More: Backing off Sliding Scale Insulin for Hospitalized Patients
Lakshmi Karra, Roxanne Radi, Corey Lyon
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 37 (1) 150-152; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230349R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Less Is More: Backing off Sliding Scale Insulin for Hospitalized Patients
Lakshmi Karra, Roxanne Radi, Corey Lyon
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 37 (1) 150-152; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230349R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Strength of Recommendation
    • Illustrative Case
    • Clinical Context
    • Methods
    • Study Summary
    • What Is New
    • Caveats
    • Challenges to Implementation
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Buprenorphine: A Better Option for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in Pregnancy Compared to Methadone
  • Keep on Keeping on – Mirena IUD for 8 Years
  • Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention
Show more PRIORITY UPDATES FROM THE RESEARCH LITERATURE (PURLs)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
  • Hospitalization
  • Sliding Scale Insulin

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire