Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportBrief Report

Advanced Practice Providers in Departments of Family Medicine: Status, Supervision, and Services

Maribeth Williams, Stephen M. Carek, Arch G. Mainous, John Malaty, Jihane Naous and Peter J. Carek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2023, 36 (6) 1058-1061; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230121R1
Maribeth Williams
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
MD, MSCR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Carek
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arch G. Mainous III
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Malaty
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jihane Naous
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Carek
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (MW, AGM, JN); Prisma Health–Upstate, Greenville, SC (SMC, PJC), USC School of Medicine, Greenville, SC (PJC).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Nurse practitioners (NP), physician assistants (PA), and other advanced practice providers (APP) are one solution to meet health care workforce shortage. Our study examined clinical workforce decisions and perceptions of APPs and family physicians (FPs) from the perspective of a national survey chairs of Departments of Family Medicine.

Methods: A survey was developed and distributed to family medicine department chairs as identified by the Association of Departments of Family Medicine (ADFM). In addition to demographic information, respondents were asked if their department directly employs APPs, major factors influencing departments of family medicine to hire APPs, services to patients currently being provided by APPs, and services preferentially provided by APPs. Descriptive statistics were reviewed. Bivariate analyses and Chi-square were computed comparing perceptions of APPs and FPs by how these types of health care providers are currently used in the respondent’s clinical operation.

Results: The overall response rate for the survey was 48.4% (109/225). Most departments of family medicine (62.4%) use APPs. Access to care and filing gaps in team-based care are the primary factors for APP employment. Although most departments have APPs provide services that include complex chronic conditions complicated by coexisting conditions or not yet controlled, most department chairs do not prefer APPs provide these services.

Discussion: The role APPs in terms of specific patient care activities and services in the health care team of departments of family medicine is often in conflict with preferred roles as delineated by the chair.

  • Advanced Practice Providers
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Workforce

Introduction

The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates a shortage of between 37,800 and 124,000 physicians (between 17,800 and 48,000 primary care physicians) by 2034.1 Nurse practitioners (NP), physician assistants (PA) and other advanced practice providers (APP) are considered one solution to meet the looming workforce shortage and to meet the increasing need for health services for the US population, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Primary care practices are embracing interdisciplinary provider configurations which including APPs that can strengthen health care delivery.2

Most family physicians (FPs) routinely work with APPs and the number is continuing to increase.3,4 Of 27,836 FPs surveyed, nearly 70% had NPs or PAs in their practice.2

Due to the lower salary requirements compared with physicians, APPs are likely seen by some health administrators as a health workforce strategy that is more cost-effective for staffing clinics and delivering care.5 Chairs of departments of family medicine have roles that may conflict. They typically oversee clinics with expectations for providing care and generating revenue, which may suggest choosing APPs for clinic staffing rather than FPs based on basic financial considerations. They also need to meet the needs of patient populations using the varying scopes of practice provided by FPs and APPs. Finally, department chairs are in the business of medical education and creating the next generation of FPs. How chairs of departments of family medicine perceive the health workforce choices in the context of these two conflicting roles is not clear. Consequently, we examined clinical workforce decisions and perceptions of APPs and FPs from the perspective of a national survey chairs of departments of family medicine.

Methods

The questions for this survey-based study were part of a larger omnibus survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA). The methodology of a CERA Survey has previously been described in detail.6 The CERA steering committee evaluated questions for consistency with the overall subproject aim, readability, and existing evidence of reliability and validity. Pretesting was done on family medicine educators who were not part of the target population. Questions were modified following pretesting for flow, timing, and readability. The project was approved by the American Academy of Family Physicians Institutional Review Board in August 2022. Data were collected from August 16 to September 16, 2022.

The sampling frame for the survey was family medicine department chairs as identified by the Association of Departments of Family Medicine (ADFM). E-mail invitations to participate were delivered with the survey using the online program Survey Monkey. Four follow-up e-mails to encourage nonrespondents to participate were sent weekly after the initial e-mail invitation and a fifth reminder was sent the morning the survey closed. There were 219 US department chairs and 18 Canadian department chairs identified at the time of the survey. Six US e-mails were undeliverable. Five people in the US and 1 person in Canada indicated they were no longer a department chair. The survey was delivered to 225 department chairs (208 US and 17 Canadian).

Survey Items

Respondents were asked if their department directly employs APPs, major factors influencing departments of family medicine to hire APPs (access to care, filling gaps, finances, inability to hire physicians, optimizing patient satisfaction, sharing the workload), services to patients currently being provided by APPs, services to patients preferentially provided by APPs. In addition, the respondents were asked if they thought having specific roles in terms of services provided by APPs was important, if having APPs staff primary care clinics will negatively affect the future value of family physicians, and whether APPs are a necessary part of the health care workforce to have a financially profitable family medicine clinic.

Analysis

The analysis began with descriptive statistics. Bivariate analyses, chi-squares, were computed comparing perceptions of APPs and FPs by how these types of health care providers are currently used in the respondent’s clinical operation. Significance levels were set at the conventional confidence level of 0.05.

Results

We received 121 responses to the survey invitation. Twelve survey responses were abandoned after answering only demographic questions and were removed from the results, meaning there were 109 responses to the survey invitation. The overall response rate for the survey was 48.4% (109/225).

Most departments of family medicine (62.4%) use APPs. Access to care and filing gaps in team-based care are the primary factors for APP employment in departments of family medicine (Table 1). Finances, inability to hire physicians, and optimizing patient satisfaction were not rated as a factor by more than 60% of respondents.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Factors Influencing Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Employment and Frequency of Priority Levels

Although most departments have APPs provide services that include complex chronic conditions complicated by coexisting conditions or not yet controlled, most department chairs do not prefer APPs provide these services (Table 2). In contrast, most department chairs (79.3%) prefer APPs provide population management than are currently doing so (58.6%). Most department chairs (67.6%) believe it is important to have specific roles in terms of services provided by APPs. Most department chairs (58.1%) do not believe having APPs staffing primary care clinics will negatively affect the future value of family physicians.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Current and Preferred Services Offered by Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) (out of 87 Respondents)

Using bivariate analysis, departments employing APPs are more likely to have APPs serve as the preferred provider of coordination of care transition services (46.0%, P = .024) and follow-up for abnormal screening tests (42.5%, P = .023). A similar association was not found regarding complex chronic conditions complicated by coexisting or not yet controlled conditions or care coordination at care transitions and population health management.

Discussion

APPs are employed by most departments of family medicine to increase access for patients and fill voids in team-based care. The role of APPs in terms of specific patient care activities and services in the health care team of departments of family medicine is often in conflict with preferred roles as delineated by the chair. This issue is exemplified by respondents indicating that APPs often provide care for patients with complex chronic conditions complicated by coexisting conditions. Most chairs prefer that APPs not provide this service. The care of these patients is often felt to be under the prevue of the family physician and this role is often being abdicated based on the results of this study.

Further, the current activities by APPs noted in this study may undermine the value of family physicians to the health care system which contrasts our findings that most respondents do not believe having APPs staffing primary care clinics will negatively affect the future of value of FPs. These contradictory findings suggest that roles for members of the health care team are often not clearly delineated, or how those roles may be optimized based on education, skills, and experience to perform duties within their scope of practice.

In conclusion, although most department chairs believe it is important to have specific roles for APPs, APPs often provide similar services to FPs. The impact of FPs and APPs with differing training, practice patterns and compensation levels providing similar services may negatively impact family medicine as a discipline. Further research is needed to define the skills and roles of APPs within family medicine clinics, specifically their scope of practice and how they can further promote quality and safety in patient care. In addition, whether differences are noted between US and other countries regarding the use of APPs needs to be explored.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/36/6/1058.full.

  • Received for publication March 27, 2023.
  • Revision received June 7, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication June 12, 2023.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2019 to 2034. Washington, DC; 2021. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/54681/download.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barnes H,
    2. Richards M,
    3. McHugh MD,
    4. Martsolf G
    . Rural and nonrural primary care physician practices increasingly rely on nurse practitioners. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:908–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Phillips RL,
    3. Puffer JC,
    4. Bazemore A,
    5. Petterson S
    . Most family physicians work routinely with nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or certified nurse midwives. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:244–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dai M,
    2. Ingham RC,
    3. Peterson LE
    . Variations in scope of practice and patient panel size of family physicians who work with nurse practitioners or physician assistants. Fam Med 2019;51:311–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van den Brink GTWJ,
    2. Hooker RS,
    3. Van Vught AJ,
    4. Vermeulen H,
    5. Laurant MGH
    . The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: a systematic review of international evidence. PLoS One 2021;16:e0259183Nov 1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Seehusen DA,
    2. Mainous AG 3rd.,
    3. Chessman AW
    . Creating a centralized infrastructure to facilitate medical education research. Ann Fam Med 2018;16:257–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 36 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 6
November-December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Advanced Practice Providers in Departments of Family Medicine: Status, Supervision, and Services
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Advanced Practice Providers in Departments of Family Medicine: Status, Supervision, and Services
Maribeth Williams, Stephen M. Carek, Arch G. Mainous, John Malaty, Jihane Naous, Peter J. Carek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 36 (6) 1058-1061; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230121R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Advanced Practice Providers in Departments of Family Medicine: Status, Supervision, and Services
Maribeth Williams, Stephen M. Carek, Arch G. Mainous, John Malaty, Jihane Naous, Peter J. Carek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 36 (6) 1058-1061; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230121R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Social Needs with Diabetes Outcomes in an Older Population
  • Insurance Instability Among Community-Based Health Center Patients with Diabetes Post-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion
  • Factors Influencing Changing Scopes of Practice Among Contemporary Graduates of the Nation’s Largest Family Medicine Residency
Show more Brief Report

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Advanced Practice Providers
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Workforce

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire