Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportBrief Report

The Ability of Practices to Report Clinical Quality Measures: More Evidence of the Size Paradox?

Michael L. Parchman, Melissa L. Anderson, Robert B. Penfold, Elena Kuo and David A. Dorr
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2020, 33 (4) 620-625; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190369
Michael L. Parchman
From Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA (MLP, MLA, RBP, EA); Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR (DAR).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa L. Anderson
From Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA (MLP, MLA, RBP, EA); Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR (DAR).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert B. Penfold
From Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA (MLP, MLA, RBP, EA); Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR (DAR).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Kuo
From Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA (MLP, MLA, RBP, EA); Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR (DAR).
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Dorr
From Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA (MLP, MLA, RBP, EA); Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR (DAR).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Cumulative probability of practices' ability to submit clinical quality measure (CQM) data, with and without centralized quality improvement (QI) support.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Practices Asked to Submit Clinical Quality Measures (n = 205†)

    Characteristicn (%)
    Practice Size
        Solo38 (18.5)
        2 to 496 (46.8)
        5 or more71 (34.6)
    State
        Washington87 (42.4)
        Oregon95 (46.3)
        Idaho23 (11.2)
    Location
        Rural91 (44.4)
        Urban114 (55.6)
    Specialty
        Family medicine166 (81.0)
        Internal medicine7 (3.4)
        Mixed32 (15.6)
    Organizational type
        FQHC22 (10.7)
        Health/hospital system81 (39.5)
        IHS/tribal10 (4.9)
        Independent92 (44.9)
    Part of a larger organization with centralized QI support
        No108 (53.2)
        Yes, contact ≥ 1 time per month70 (34.5)
        Yes, a few times per year15 (7.4)
        Yes, infrequent or no regular contact10 (4.9)
    • *Four of the 209 randomized practices were excluded because they withdrew study participation before the baseline request for CQM data.

    • FQHC, Federally Qualified Health Center; IHS, inpatient hospital services; QI, quality improvement; CQM, clinical quality measure.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Time to Submission of Clinical Quality Measures by Practice Characteristic

    NAble to submit CQM dataAmong Practices Able to Submit CQM Data (n = 187)
    Within 30 DaysWithin 60 DaysWithin 6 monthsWithin 15 monthsTime to submission (days)
    n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)P-Value†Mean (SD)Median
    Overall20561 (30)116 (57)171 (83)187 (91)74 (77)41
    Part of a larger organization with centralized QI support*
        No10841 (38)68 (63)90 (83)95 (88)0.1461 (77)40
        Yes9519 (20)46 (48)79 (83)90 (95)88 (74)57
    Autonomy to choose QI projects*
        None, or a little autonomy4011 (28)14 (35)32 (80)38 (95)0.55103 (85)94
        A lot of autonomy6413 (20)38 (59)54 (84)59 (92)79 (85)45
        Complete autonomy10037 (37)63 (63)84 (84)89 (89)58 (63)38
    Practice size
        Solo3816 (42)30 (79)33 (87)34 (89)0.8549 (66)34
        2 to 49628 (29)48 (50)81 (84)87 (91)72 (60)54
        5+7117 (24)38 (54)57 (80)66 (93)90 (96)47
    QI priority*
        Low (1 to 7)9334 (37)57 (61)80 (86)84 (90)0.8161 (61)39
        High (8 to 10)10724 (22)55 (51)86 (80)98 (92)86 (87)51
    Ever run a non-standard QI report*
        No11937 (31)66 (55)93 (78)105 (88)0.1378 (86)41
        Yes8121 (26)46 (57)73 (90)77 (95)70 (63)41
    • ↵* Missing data: QI support (n = 2); autonomy (n = 1); QI priority (n = 5); ever run a non-standard report (n = 5).

    • ↵† P-value reports the significance of differences in the proportion able to submit data within 15 months from the date ABCS data was requested, based on Fisher's Exact Test.

    • CQM, clinical quality measure; SD, standard deviation; QI, quality improvement; ABCS, aspirin, blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 4
July-August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Ability of Practices to Report Clinical Quality Measures: More Evidence of the Size Paradox?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Ability of Practices to Report Clinical Quality Measures: More Evidence of the Size Paradox?
Michael L. Parchman, Melissa L. Anderson, Robert B. Penfold, Elena Kuo, David A. Dorr
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2020, 33 (4) 620-625; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190369

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Ability of Practices to Report Clinical Quality Measures: More Evidence of the Size Paradox?
Michael L. Parchman, Melissa L. Anderson, Robert B. Penfold, Elena Kuo, David A. Dorr
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2020, 33 (4) 620-625; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190369
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Medications, Medicating, and Medicated--When, Where, and How--Opioids and Others
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Social Needs with Diabetes Outcomes in an Older Population
  • Insurance Instability Among Community-Based Health Center Patients with Diabetes Post-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion
  • Factors Influencing Changing Scopes of Practice Among Contemporary Graduates of the Nation’s Largest Family Medicine Residency
Show more Brief Reports

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Electronic Health Records
  • Health Metrics
  • Primary Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire