Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Subjective Versus Objective Assessment of Cognitive Functioning in Primary Care

Courtney Hess, Boaz Levy, Ardeshir Z. Hashmi, Jacqueline Hogan, Sarah Greenspan, Allison Elber, Kathryn Falcon and Daniel F. Driscoll
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 417-425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190265
Courtney Hess
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boaz Levy
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ardeshir Z. Hashmi
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline Hogan
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Greenspan
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison Elber
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Falcon
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel F. Driscoll
From the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA (CH, BL, JH, SG, AE, KF); Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Ohio (AH); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (DD); and McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, Harvard Medical School (BL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Test sensitivity to subjective concerns in unimpaired participants (MoCA ≥ 26). Abbreviations: BP, balloon popping (assessing motor speed); EOS, even-odd switching (assessing cognitive control/flexibility in set shifting); MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NS, number sequencing (assessing processing speed).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Test sensitivity to healthy aging (MoCA ≥ 26). Abbreviations: EOS, even-odd switching (assessing cognitive control/flexibility in set shifting); MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participant Demographics

    Demographic VariableN (%)
    Sex
        Female82 (67.8)
        Male39 (32.2)
    Race
        Asians or Asian Americans1 (0.8)
        Black or African Americans1 (0.8)
        White119 (98.4)
    Education
        High school diploma14 (11.6)
        Associate's degree16 (13.2)
        Bachelor's degree49 (40.5)
        Master's degree25 (20.7)
        Doctoral degree17 (14.0)
    Marital status
        Single15 (12.4)
        Married73 (60.3)
        Divorced11 (9.10)
        Widowed22 (18.2)
    Employment status
        Retired102 (84.3)
        Employed full time10 (8.3)
        Employed part time6 (5.0)
        Volunteering2 (1.7)
        Long-term disability1 (0.8)a
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Sample Classification Based on Objective and Subjective Cognitive Measures

    Objective MeasuresSubjective Measure
    LowHighTotal
    MoCA clinical cutoff score
        Unimpaired (≥ 26)7922101
        Impaired (< 26)17320
            Total9625121
    Computerized tests (k-means clustering)
        Unimpaired811697
        Impaired15924
            Total9625121
    • MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Yuen Comparisons of Cognitive Tests across Subjective Levels of Concern and Age Groups

    Groups ComparedTestn1, n2tmean1tmean2SEYuendfP ValueE.size
    High versus low levels of subjective memory concernBP22,7924.7121.902.131.3117.950.200.12
    NS22,7945.2237.955.491.3214.030.200.12
    EOS22,79107.9772.7310.343.4014.830.0003***0.32
    MoCA22,7927.6428.10.451.1816.650.250.11
    Age, based on < 75, ≥ 75 splitEOS32,69100.0471.179.43.0623.040.005***0.29
    MoCA32,6928.0028.110.370.3029.590.760.02
    • BP, balloon popping; EOS, even-odd sequencing; E.size, effect size; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NS, number sequencing; tmean, trimmed mean; Yuen, test statistic, SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Subjective Versus Objective Assessment of Cognitive Functioning in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Subjective Versus Objective Assessment of Cognitive Functioning in Primary Care
Courtney Hess, Boaz Levy, Ardeshir Z. Hashmi, Jacqueline Hogan, Sarah Greenspan, Allison Elber, Kathryn Falcon, Daniel F. Driscoll
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 417-425; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190265

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Subjective Versus Objective Assessment of Cognitive Functioning in Primary Care
Courtney Hess, Boaz Levy, Ardeshir Z. Hashmi, Jacqueline Hogan, Sarah Greenspan, Allison Elber, Kathryn Falcon, Daniel F. Driscoll
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 417-425; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190265
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Real-Time EEG Response to Pulsed Transcranial Photobiomodulation in Healthy Young Adults: Effects of Stimulation Parameters and Skin Tone
  • Well-Being, New Technologies, and Clinical Evidence for Family Physicians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cognitive Aging
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Dementia
  • Memory
  • Mental Status and Dementia Tests
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire