Abstract
Hemoglobin A1c is frequently used in primary care to screen for and monitor disorders of glucose metabolism. A number of clinical syndromes may impact the accuracy of this laboratory value. This report describes a case of abnormally low hemoglobin A1c that was the result of an asymptomatic compound hemoglobinopathy (homozygous hemoglobin S disease and hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin) that had gone previously undiagnosed. Primary care physicians must be aware of such pitfalls in the use of this laboratory value and be prepared to use other values to monitor for and assess disorders of glucose metabolism.
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Fetal Hemoglobin
- Glucose
- Glycated Hemoglobin A
- Hematology
- Hemoglobinopathies
- Primary Care Physicians
- Primary Health Care
Glycohemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is bound to glucose. The level is used in the screening, diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. We describe a case of a 43-year-old Dominican woman who, on routine screening, was found to have an abnormally low glycohemoglobin value as a result of a compound hemoglobinopathy. The discussion reviews the few causes of such an abnormally low value and the relevant follow-up.
Case Report
A 43-year-old nulliparous Dominican woman presented to establish care after immigrating to the United States. Her physical examination was within normal limits apart from obesity (Body mass index (BMI), 30.6 kg/m2) and she had no complaints at the time of her visit. She was screened for type 2 diabetes mellitus using a hemoglobin A1c given her obesity, high-risk ethnic group, and age in addition to other evidence-based screening tests. On return of her laboratory results, her hemoglobin A1c was noted to be <3.5%. The remainder of her screening tests were normal.
Given the abnormal A1c value, the patient was called back for further lab testing. A repeat A1c was done to rule out lab error as well as a fasting glucose, a complete blood count with indices, and fecal occult blood. The repeat A1c was again <3.5% with fasting glucose of 95 mg/dL. Fecal occult blood was negative for 3 samples. The complete blood count was essentially normal (hemoglobin, 12.2 g/dL; hematocrit, 34.5%) with the exception of a low mean corpuscular volume of 76.2 fL (normal, 82 to 100). The remainder of the indices were normal.
Given the microcytosis noted on the complete blood count (CBC) and elevated rate of hemoglobinopathies in this patient's ethnic group, a hemoglobin electrophoresis was performed and was markedly abnormal: 0% hemoglobin A, 36.3% hemoglobin F, 3.9% hemoglobin A2, and 59.8% hemoglobin S. The interpretation of this electrophoresis was homozygosity of hemoglobin S (sickle-cell disease) in combination with hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin.
Discussion
Hemoglobin A1c became available to clinicians in 1978 and was first recommended for clinical use by the American Diabetes Association a decade later in 1988.1 Various studies over the years have demonstrated the utility of hemoglobin A1c in predicting diabetes-related outcomes and complications.2,3 Since 2010, hemoglobin A1c has been recommended as one of the criteria that may be used for the diagnosis of diabetes,3 further expanding its clinical utility. Despite these benefits, a number of clinical scenarios may contribute to false results of this lab test. An excellent review by Radin4 reviews these potential conditions as noted in Table 1.
Since hemoglobin A1c is a product of the glycosylation of hemoglobin A, its use in patients with hemoglobinopathies may be less accurate for predicting disorders of glucose metabolism.5 This is particularly impactful on those hemoglobinopathies that demonstrate an abnormal quantity of hemoglobin A. In the case of our patient, her hemoglobin electrophoresis demonstrated 0% hemoglobin A, which explains her A1c value of <3.5%. Other reviews have demonstrated that A1c seems to be most inaccurate in the case of homozygous hemoglobinopathies,6 which was also the case with our patient.
Since hemoglobin A1c cannot be used in these patients to screen for or monitor diabetes mellitus, clinicians may use another of the American Diabetes Association's recommended screening approaches; fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia, or plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL 2 hours after a 75-g glucose load.9 In terms of monitoring glycemic control, clinicians may consider either following a glucose log of both fasting and postprandial values or using other markers such as fructosamine.4
Of particular interest in this case was the presentation of co-occurring hemoglobinopathies with mitigating effects on one another. Our patient was homozygous for hemoglobin SS (sickle-cell disease) with 59.8% hemoglobin S on her electrophoresis. The usual morbidity and mortality of this condition, as well as the usual finding of profound anemia, were mitigated by the presence of hereditary persistence of hemoglobin F, a coinherited hemoglobinopathy whose effects protect erythrocytes from hemoglobin S polymer-induced damage.7 Both of these conditions are found at higher incidence in the patient's home country8 and in this case were revealed by her abnormally low hemoglobin A1c.
Notes
This article was externally peer reviewed.
Funding: none.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/32/6/923.full.
- Received for publication April 4, 2019.
- Revision received June 10, 2019.
- Accepted for publication June 11, 2019.