Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
LetterCorrespondence

Re: A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations

Pascal J. de Caprariis
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2019, 32 (4) 639; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.190065
Pascal J. de Caprariis
Brooklyn, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: Drs Tunzi and Ventres1 have addressed the importance of discussing advance care planning (ACP) with an integrative approach. ACP conversations should be broad yet flexible, and the surrogate's inclusion in the discussion is critical. It is appropriate for family physicians to initiate an ACP dialog considering their usually close relationship with the family.

From our experience, the discussion should not be initiated based on an individual reaching 65 years of age. An ACP should be considered for all adults, and the discussion best initiated during an annual physical. We proposed several steps for a meaningful dialog in an office setting.2 The physician should carefully prepare the ACP discussion: make it specific to the patient, allow adequate time, and even rehearse the methodology in approaching the issue. Emphasis should be placed on the fact that an advance directive (AD) is a legal document. It provides an individual's instructions regarding his/her future medical care and identifies the health care proxy agent. Furthermore, before the discussion, the physician should succinctly explain that ACP is a routine segment of an annual physical, and is relevant to adults of all ages.

Many factors may potentially arise during an ACP discussion.3 The physician may observe that the body language displayed demonstrates an uncomfortable attitude toward with the topic. Barriers are often raised4 that may be related to cultural,5 racial,6 religious,7 and/or gender issues.8 Medical procedures acceptable to the physician, may be unacceptable to the party involved. Some patients suffering a chronic illness and/or a terminal illness may nevertheless choose not to institute an AD.9 When a person refuses to enact an AD, the physician must respect that decision.

A family member or a close trusted friend should be considered as the proxy agent and encouraged to attend a subsequent visit. The physician should emphasize that the surrogate is guided by the patient's wishes which are clearly detailed in the AD document. The surrogate will act as the proxy agent only when a patient is incapacitated and furthermore, it is the duty of the proxy agent to ensure that the individual's directives and wishes be fulfilled.

As mentioned previously, the physician's predialog preparation is vitally important for a successful discourse. The ACP discussion both educates and explores the benefits of an AD, and further establishes that on signing the document, the individual can be confident that his/her wishes will be respected and conducted in the future.

Notes

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/32/4/639.full.

  • The above letter was referred to the author of the article in question, who offers the following reply.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tunzi M,
    2. Ventres W
    . A reflective case study in family medicine advance care planning conversations. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:108–114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. de Caprariis PJ,
    2. Rucker B,
    3. Lyon C
    . Discussing advance care planning and directives in the general population. South Med J 2017;110:563–568.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Klugman CM
    . Advance directives to physicians: What every physician should know. South Med J 2012;105:289–291.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Spoelhof GD,
    2. Elliott B
    . Implementing advance directives in office practice. Am Fam Physician 2012;85:461–466.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Searight HR,
    2. Gafford J
    . Cultural diversity at the end of life: Issues and guidelines for family physicians. Am Fam Physician 2005;71:515–522.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rhodes RL,
    2. Batchelor K,
    3. Lee SC,
    4. et al
    . Barriers to end-of-life care for African Americans from the providers' perspective: Opportunity for intervention development. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2015;32:137–143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schmidt U
    . European Protestant churches reflect on end-of-life issues. May 1, 2015. Available from: http://www.elca.org/JLE/Articles/1091. Accessed February 20, 2019.
  8. 8.↵
    1. de Caprariis PJ,
    2. Thompson S,
    3. Lippman N,
    4. et al
    . It is time for a gender specific discussion on advanced directives with female patients during routine health visits. J Community Health 2013;38:995–996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. de Caprariis PJ,
    2. Carballo-Diéguez A,
    3. Thompson S,
    4. et al
    . Advance directives and HIV: A current trend in the inner city. J Community Health, 2013;38:409–413.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 4
July-August 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re: A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Re: A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations
Pascal J. de Caprariis
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2019, 32 (4) 639; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.190065

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Re: A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations
Pascal J. de Caprariis
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2019, 32 (4) 639; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.190065
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An Approach to Hair Loss in Hijab-Wearing Individuals in Primary Care
  • Re: Impact of Geodemographic Factors on Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute, Uncomplicated Bronchitis or Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
  • Re: Blood Pressure Checks for Diagnosing Hypertension: Health Professionals' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practice
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire