Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing Strategies for Translating Self-Management Support into Primary Care Practices

W. Perry Dickinson, L. Miriam Dickinson, Bonnie T. Jortberg, Danielle M. Hessler, Douglas H. Fernald, Michael Cuffney and Lawrence Fisher
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2019, 32 (3) 341-352; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180254

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Berenson RA,
    2. Hammons T,
    3. Gans DN,
    4. et al
    . A house is not a home: keeping patients at the center of practice redesign. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1219–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Riley KM,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Eakin EG
    . Resources for health: A social-ecological intervention for supporting self-management of chronic conditions. J Health Psychol 2001;6:693–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Toobert DJ,
    3. Hampson SE
    . Effects of a brief office-based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Diabetes Care 1996;19:835–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barrera M Jr.,
    2. Toobert DJ,
    3. Angell KL,
    4. Glasgow RE,
    5. Mackinnon DP
    . Social support and social-ecological resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol 2006;11:483–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schillinger D,
    2. Handley M,
    3. Wang F,
    4. Hammer H
    . Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: A three-arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2009;32:559–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Norris SL,
    2. Engelgau MM,
    3. Narayan KM
    . Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001;24:561–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jortberg BT,
    2. Fernald DH,
    3. Hessler DM,
    4. et al
    . Practice characteristics associated with better implementation of patient self-management supp. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;3:329–40.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tallia AF,
    2. Stange KC,
    3. McDaniel RR Jr..,
    4. Aita VA,
    5. Miller WL,
    6. Crabtree BF
    . Understanding organizational designs of primary care practices. J Healthc Manag 2003;48:45–59; discussion 60–1.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Solberg LI,
    2. Brekke ML,
    3. Fazio CJ,
    4. et al
    . Lessons from experienced guideline implementers: attend to many factors and use Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000;26:171–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jaén CR
    . Successful health information technology implementation requires practice and health care system transformation. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:388–99.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Prochaska JO,
    2. Velicer WF,
    3. Redding C,
    4. et al
    . Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prevent Med 2005;41:406–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Bull SS,
    3. Piette JD,
    4. Steiner JF
    . Interactive behavior change technology. A partial solution to the competing demands of primary care. Am J Prevent Med 2004;27:80–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vandelanotte C,
    2. De Bourdeaudhuij I,
    3. Brug J
    . Two-year follow-up of sequential and simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Ann Behav Med 2007;33:213–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Edwards LL,
    3. Whitesides H,
    4. Carroll N,
    5. Sanders TJ,
    6. McCray BL
    . Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illn 2009;5:243–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rabin BA,
    2. Glasgow RE
    . Dissemination and implementation of interactive health communication applications. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Brug J,
    2. Oenema A,
    3. Campbell M
    . Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1028S–1034S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tate DF,
    2. Jackvony EH,
    3. Wing RR
    . Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:1833–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Oenema A,
    2. Brug J,
    3. Lechner L
    . Web-based tailored nutrition education: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res 2001;16:647–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Vandelanotte C,
    2. De Bourdeaudhuij I,
    3. Brug J
    . Acceptability and feasibility of an interactive computer-tailored fat intake intervention in Belgium. Health Promot Int 2004;19:463–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wanner M,
    2. Martin-Diener E,
    3. Braun-Fahrländer C,
    4. Bauer G,
    5. Martin BW
    . Effectiveness of active-online, an individually tailored physical activity intervention, in a real-life setting: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Spittaels H,
    2. De Bourdeaudhuij I,
    3. Brug J,
    4. Vandelanotte C
    . Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting. Health Educ Res 2007;22:385–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Steele R,
    2. Mummery WK,
    3. Dwyer T
    . Using the Internet to promote physical activity: A randomized trial of intervention delivery modes. J Phys Act Health 2007;4:245–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Strecher VJ,
    2. McClure J,
    3. Alexander G,
    4. et al
    . The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Strecher VJ,
    2. McClure JB,
    3. Alexander GL,
    4. et al
    . Web-based smoking-cessation programs: Results of a randomized trial. Am J Prevent Med 2008;34:373–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Austin Boren S,
    2. Gunlock TL,
    3. Krishna S,
    4. Kramer TC
    . Computer-aided diabetes education: A synthesis of randomized controlled trials. AMIA Sympos 2006:51–5.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Welch G,
    2. Weinger K,
    3. Anderson B,
    4. Polonsky WH
    . Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabet Med 2003;20:69–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Hiss RG,
    3. Anderson RM,
    4. et al
    . Report of the health care delivery work group: Behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2001;24:124–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hiss RG
    . Barriers to care in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Michigan experience. Ann Intern Med 1996;124(1 Pt 2):146–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wagner EH,
    2. Davis C,
    3. Schaefer J,
    4. Von Korff M,
    5. Austin B
    . A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: Are they consistent with the literature? Manag Care Q 1999;7:56–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cabana MD,
    2. Rand CS,
    3. Powe NR,
    4. et al
    . Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Polonsky WH,
    2. Earles J,
    3. Smith S,
    4. et al
    . Integrating medical management with diabetes self-management training: A randomized control trial of the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment program. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3048–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Norris SL,
    2. Nichols PJ,
    3. Caspersen CJ,
    4. et al
    . Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings. A systematic review. Am J Prevent Med 2002;22:39–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Clark NM,
    2. Becker MH,
    3. Lorig K,
    4. Rakowski W,
    5. Anderson L
    . Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: A review and questions for research. J Aging Health 1991;3:3–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bennett GG,
    2. Glasgow RE
    . The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:273–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Strecher V
    . Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007;3:53–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Toobert DJ,
    2. Glasgow RE
    . Problem solving and diabetes self-care. J Behav Med 1991;14:71–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Mold JW,
    3. Aspy CB
    . Practice facilitators: A review of the literature. Fam Med 2005;37:581–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Goodwin MA,
    2. Zyzanski SJ,
    3. Zronek S,
    4. et al
    . A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery. The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP). Am J Prevent Med 2001;21:20–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Goodwin MA,
    3. Zyzanski SJ,
    4. Dietrich AJ
    . Sustainability of a practice-individualized preventive service delivery intervention. Am J Prevent Med 2003;25:296–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hogg W,
    2. Baskerville N,
    3. Nykiforuk C,
    4. Mallen D
    . Improved preventive care in family practices with outreach facilitation: Understanding success and failure. J Health Serv Res Pol 2002;7:195–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Buscaj E,
    2. Hall T,
    3. Montgomery L,
    4. et al
    . Practice facilitation for PCMH implementation in residency practices. Fam Med 2016;48:795–800.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Baskerville NB,
    2. Liddy C,
    3. Hogg W
    . Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:63–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Dickinson WP,
    3. Fisher L,
    4. et al
    . Patient-centered assessment, communication, and outcomes in the primary care medical home: Use of RE-AIM to develop a multi-media facilitation tool. Implement Sci 2011;6:118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. McKay HG,
    3. Piette JD,
    4. Reynolds KD
    . The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 2001;44:119–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Glanz K,
    2. Rimer BK,
    3. Viswanath K
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Linnan LA
    . Evaluation of theory-based interventions. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008;487–508.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Brownson RC,
    2. Colditz GA,
    3. Proctor EK
    1. Gaglio B,
    2. Glasgow RE
    . Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  47. 47.↵
    1. Belza B,
    2. Toobert DJ,
    3. Glasgow RE
    . RE-AIM for program planning: Overview and applications. Center for Healthy Aging Issue Brief, 2007.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Toobert DJ
    . RE-AIM: Application to AoA evidence-based demonstration projects. 3rd Annual Agency on Aging Grantees Conference. Washington, DC, 2006.
  49. 49.↵
    1. Dickinson WP,
    2. Dickinson LM,
    3. Jortberg BT,
    4. Hessler DM,
    5. Fernald DH,
    6. Fisher L
    . A protocol for a cluster randomized trial comparing strategies for translating self-management support into primary care practices. BMC Fam Pract 2018;19:126.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Dickinson LM,
    2. Beaty B,
    3. Fox C,
    4. et al
    . Pragmatic cluster randomized trials using covariate constrained randomization: A method for practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:663–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Lokhnygina Y,
    3. Murray DM,
    4. Heagerty PJ,
    5. DeLong ER
    . An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Stat Med 2016;35:1565–79.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Giraudeau B,
    2. Ravaud P
    . Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000065.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Puffer S,
    2. Torgerson D,
    3. Watson J
    . Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: Review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 2003;327:785–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Campbell MK,
    2. Elbourne DR,
    3. Altman DG
    . CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2004;328:702–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Murray D
    , ed. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  56. 56.↵
    1. Dempster AP,
    2. Laird NM,
    3. Rubin DB
    . Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 1977:1–38.
  57. 57.↵
    1. Little RJA,
    2. Rubin DB
    . Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.
  58. 58.↵
    1. Fairclough D
    , ed. Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002.
  59. 59.↵
    1. Diggle P,
    2. Kenward MG
    . Informative drop-out in longitudinal data-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 1994:49–93.
  60. 60.↵
    1. Littell R,
    2. Milliken GA,
    3. Stroup WW,
    4. Wolfinger RD
    , eds. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1996.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Hedeker D,
    2. Gibbons RD
    . Longitudinal Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  62. 62.↵
    1. Bryk AS,
    2. Raudenbush SW
    , eds. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords