Factors Related to Implementation and Reach of a Pragmatic Multisite Trial: The My Own Health Report (MOHR) Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kaplan HC,
   2. Provost LP,
   3. Froehle CM,
   4. Margolis PA

   . The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:13–20.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Stange KC,
   2. Glasgow RE

   . Considering and reporting important contextual factors in research on the patient-centered medical home. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
3. 3.↵
   1. Badger F,
   2. Plumridge G,
   3. Hewison A,
   4. Shaw KL,
   5. Thomas K,
   6. Clifford C

   . An evaluation of the impact of the Gold Standards Framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud 2012;49:586–95.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Chaney EF,
   2. Rubenstein LV,
   3. Liu CF,
   4. et al

   . Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: a cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign. Implement Sci 2011;6:121.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Macq J,
   2. Solis A,
   3. Martinez G,
   4. Martiny P

   . Tackling tuberculosis patients' internalized social stigma through patient centred care: an intervention study in rural Nicaragua. BMC Public Health 2008;8:154.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Shaw RJ,
   2. Kaufman MA,
   3. Bosworth HB,
   4. et al

   . Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study. Implement Sci 2013;8:106.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Van Herck P,
   2. De Smedt D,
   3. Annemans L,
   4. Remmen R,
   5. Rosenthal MB,
   6. Sermeus W

   . Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:247.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Moher D,
   2. Hopewell S,
   3. Schulz KF,
   4. et al

   . CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:e1–37.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Schulz KF,
   2. Altman DG,
   3. Moher D

   . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Green LW,
    2. Glasgow RE

    . Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006;29:126–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Dobrow MJ,
    2. Goel V,
    3. Lemieux-Charles L,
    4. Black NA

    . The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1811–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. May CR,
    2. Mair FS,
    3. Dowrick CF,
    4. Finch TL

    . Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:1–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. McDonald KM,
    2. Schultz EM,
    3. Chang C

    . Evaluating the state of quality-improvement science through evidence synthesis: insights from the closing the quality gap series. Perm J 2013;17:52–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Rojas Smith L,
    2. Ashok M,
    3. Dy SM,
    4. Wines RC,
    5. Teixeira-Poit S

    . Contextual frameworks for research on the implementation of complex system interventions. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
15. 15.↵
    1. Tomoaia-Cotisel A,
    2. Scammon DL,
    3. Waitzman NJ,
    4. et al

    . Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(Suppl 1):S115–23.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Kaplan HC,
    2. Brady PW,
    3. Dritz MC,
    4. et al

    . The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:500–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Damschroder LJ,
    2. Aron DC,
    3. Keith RE,
    4. Kirsh SR,
    5. Alexander JA,
    6. Lowery JC

    . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kitson A,
    2. Harvey G,
    3. McCormack B

    . Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998;7:149–58.

    OpenUrlAbstract
19. 19.↵
    1. Bergstrom A,
    2. Skeen S,
    3. Duc DM,
    4. et al

    . Health system context and implementation of evidence-based practices-development and validation of the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool for low- and middle-income settings. Implement Sci 2015;10:120.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Harvey G,
    2. Kitson A

    . PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci 2016;11:33.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Kessler RS,
    3. Ory MG,
    4. Roby D,
    5. Gorin SS,
    6. Krist A

    . Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:212–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Glenn BA,
    3. Glasgow RE,
    4. et al

    . Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project. Implement Sci 2013;8:73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Phillips SM,
    3. Sabo RT,
    4. et al

    . Adoption, reach, implementation, and maintenance of a behavioral and mental health assessment in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:525–33.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Phillips SM,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Bello G,
    4. et al

    . Frequency and prioritization of patient health risks from a structured health risk assessment. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:505–13.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Heurtin-Roberts S,
    4. et al

    ; MOHR Study Group. The impact of behavioral and mental health risk assessments on goal setting in primary care. Transl Behav Med 2016;6:212–9.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    National Cancer Institute. MyOwnHealthReport. 2016. Available from: http://myownhealthreport.org/. Accessed January 11, 2017.
27. 27.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Miller WL

    1. Borkan J

    . Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999. pp. 179–94.
28. 28.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Vogt TM,
    3. Boles SM

    . Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1322–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Balasubramanian BA,
    2. Cohen DJ,
    3. Davis MM,
    4. et al

    . Learning evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations. Implement Sci 2015;10:31.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Nutting PA,
    2. Crabtree BF,
    3. Stewart EE,
    4. et al

    . Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 2010;8(Suppl 1):S33–44; S92.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Shaw EK,
    2. Chase SM,
    3. Howard J,
    4. Nutting PA,
    5. Crabtree BF

    . More black box to explore: how quality improvement collaboratives shape practice change. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:149–57.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text