Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
EditorialEditors' Note

Research on Clinical Decisions Made Daily in Family Medicine

Marjorie A. Bowman, Anne Victoria Neale and Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2017, 30 (3) 269-271; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.170125
Marjorie A. Bowman
MD, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Victoria Neale
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dean A. Seehusen
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This issue presents research on the types of decisions that are required daily in family medicine. Patients often make these health decisions, and family physicians help patients with these decisions daily. Patients and their family physicians discuss when to quit screening for colon cancer, which treatment to choose for localized prostate cancer, when to test for pertussis when a cough is present, whether to take prescribed medications, how to complete more preventive services, and how to understand the “new genetics”, and family physician use of telehealth.

Decision: Intensity of Depression Intervention

The DOC-61 can help providers predict which patients with depression are likely to enter remission and which are likely to continue to suffer from persistent depressive symptoms after 6 months. This tool is based on demographic factors and familiar, commonly used instruments. The factors in the final instrument are intuitive and consistent with well-known literature, and most family physicians would be able to predict them. Advantages are that the instrument can be scored by office staff and is thus more straightforward than physician “intuition.” Notably, this study was done in the setting of an established, reliable collaborative care model for patients with depression.

Decision: When to Stop Colon Cancer Screening

Physicians help patients make decisions about colon cancer screening (eg, when to stop screening). Comorbidities and life expectancy are important, but differences in viewpoints among specialties also are evident. Le et al2 report on the views of gastroenterologists versus primary care physicians regarding who takes responsibility to help patients make decisions to discontinue screening.

Decision: Which Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face several treatment options with similar prognoses but substantial differences in side effects; therefore the decision can be confusing. Two studies show that significant gaps exist in patients' knowledge about localized prostate cancer treatment and outcomes, and that many men discuss the possibilities with their primary care providers.3,4 Do patients with more knowledge have an easier time making decisions regarding treatment for their prostate cancer? Do men who talk with their primary care provider make different treatment choices? The answers to these questions might surprise you. Important implications also exist for how family physicians assist their patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.5

Decision: When to Consider and Test for Pertussis

Ebell et al6 provide a wonderful review of the literature, analyzing the heterogeneity and likelihood of clinician impressions of various symptoms when making a clinical diagnosis of pertussis. Diagnosis remains challenging, particularly in adults, and relies heavily on a clinician's vigilance. Before current tests were widely available, I (MAB) once identified a middle-aged adult working in a nursing home with a probable diagnosis of pertussis. This prompted calls to the laboratory and the health department to determine how testing could be done; the test was positive and much more work to protect others ensued—a major outbreak of pertussis among adults was thus identified. Yes, pertussis has public health implications. This analysis is well worth the read.

Decision: How and When to Use Telehealth in Family Medicine

Telehealth is highly touted. Many readers probably have health insurance that encourages the use of telehealth, as health insurers now commonly encourage patients to engage in online visits with physicians. Further, Americans love their technology, with its convenience and immediacy. Some types of telehealth could be very helpful, such as teledermatology and telesupport for distant postoperative specialty care. Yet, telehealth remains a small part of health care overall. Moore et al7 report a nationwide survey, providing an update on family physicians' current provision of telehealth (low) and views of barriers. For family physicians to increase their provision of telehealth services, we would require (1) sufficient reimbursement dollars for it to be a good use of time, (2) reorganization of office and patient schedules, and (3) more evidence of how it efficiently improves health outcomes. Thus far, much telehealth is hype and is used as a marketing tool.

Decision: Recognize the Real Reasons/Beliefs Behind Patient or Physician Adherence

Beliefs about prescribed medicines and their effectiveness seem to be more important than other barriers to medication adherence.8 Thus, general questions such as, “What keeps you from taking the medicine?,” “What would get you to take the medicine?,” or “How do you feel about this medicine?” may assist in determining the real reasons people are not taking prescribed medications. This can lead to more productive adherence discussions. Similarly, family physician beliefs about a study intervention's value affected their participation in a multisite trial, over and above other common implementation barriers.9

Decision: How to Promote Patient-Entered Data to Increase Preventive Services

Foucher-Urcuyo and coauthors10 used a technology intervention—namely, patient-entered data using a tablet device in the waiting room—to increase the provision of preventive services. This method probably cues both patients and physicians to consider these services, and may be more successful than some other methods, such as getting patients to enter data from home, in advance of visits. It also may make the time in the waiting room go by more quickly.

Decision: Use Medical Assistant Health Coaching for Lifestyle Change?

In this pilot study, Djuric et al11 report positive weight-loss outcomes in the 49% of patients who completed 12 weeks of coaching. Overall, small differences were found at the end of the study. The health coaching focused on internal motivation and encouraged goal setting, and was sometimes delivered by telephone. Of note, the 2 medical assistants had bachelor's degrees, and the patients were well educated and exercised more than the average American at baseline.

Decision: New Use for Dermoscopy

Dermoscopy is gaining popularity among family physicians. Naimer12 alerts us to another innovative use of this versatile tool: facilitating the removal of cutaneous foreign bodies.

The New Genetics

Genetics knowledge is exploding, reducing the likelihood that most physicians will understand the latest implications and testing. Thus, we provide this brief overview from Milunsky13 to promote awareness of current genetic testing, including strengths and weaknesses.

Primary Care Workforce

It is widely accepted that (1) more family physicians are needed, (2) family physicians trained in community health centers are more likely to practice in similar settings, and (3) federal funding that supported additional residency positions in community health settings attracts trainees. However, the financing for the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education program and its training positions are now in jeopardy,14 which is unfortunate and untimely for the health of the nation. We believe the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education program is successful and should be continued and expanded. See also Gravel′s (15) commentary on how funding instability limits the impact of Teaching Health Centers.

World Perspective on Primary Care

The United States obviously is not ready to embrace and fulfill the promise of primary care the way other countries have. For example, by expanding primary care, Ecuador dramatically increased its international ranking for health care efficiency from 111th to 20th among 121 countries worldwide.16 We wish that the United States understood the importance of primary care in reducing health care costs. In another article, Kao and Wu17 provide national-level data on the positive effect of continuity in ambulatory care on emergency department visits among the elderly in Taiwan. Another win for primary care!

Notes

  • Conflict of interest: The authors are editors of the JABFM.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/30/3/269.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Angstman KB,
    2. Garrison GM,
    3. Gonzalez CA,
    4. Cozine DW,
    5. Cozine EW,
    6. Katzelnick DJ
    . Prediction of primary care depression outcomes at six months: validation of DOC-6©. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:281–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Le ST,
    2. Lash BR,
    3. Schroy PC III.,
    4. Calderwood AH
    . Physician perceptions of surveillance follow-up colonoscopy in older adults. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:371–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Daum LM,
    2. Reamer EN,
    3. Ruterbusch JJ,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Holmes-Rovner M,
    6. Xu J
    . Patient knowledge of and qualities of treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:288–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Radhakrishnan A,
    2. Grande D,
    3. Ross M,
    4. et al
    . When primary care providers (PCPs) help patients choose prostate cancer treatment. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:298–307.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Jiang T,
    2. Stillson CH,
    3. Pollack CE,
    4. et al
    . How men with prostate cancer choose specialists: a qualitative study. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:220–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Marchello C,
    3. Callahan M
    . Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:308–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Moore MA,
    2. Coffman M,
    3. Jetty A,
    4. Klink K,
    5. Petterson S,
    6. Bazemore A
    . Family physicians report considerable interest in, but limited use of, telehealth services. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:320–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gagnon MD,
    2. Waltermaurer E,
    3. Martin A,
    4. Friedenson C,
    5. Gayle E,
    6. Hauser DL
    . Patient beliefs have a greater impact than barriers on medication adherence in a community health center. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:331–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Balasubramanian BA,
    2. Heurtin-Roberts S,
    3. Krasny S,
    4. et al
    . Factors related to implementation and reach of a pragmatic multisite trial: the My Own Health Report (MOHR) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:337–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Foucher-Urcuyo J,
    2. Longworth D,
    3. Roizen M,
    4. Hu B,
    5. Rothberg MB
    . Patient-entered wellness data and tailored electronic recommendations increase preventive care. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:350–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Djuric Z,
    2. Segar M,
    3. Orizondo C,
    4. et al
    . Delivery of health coaching by medical assistants in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:362–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Naimer SA
    . Therapeutic dermoscopy to facilitate detection and extraction of foreign bodies. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:374–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Milunsky A
    . The “new genetics” in clinical practice: a brief primer. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:377–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kurz T,
    2. Liaw W,
    3. Wingrove P,
    4. Petterson S,
    5. Bazemore A
    . Funding instability reduces the impact of the federal Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education program. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:279–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    1. Gravel J Jr.
    . Uncertainty in Teaching Health Center (THC) Funding: Still Crazy After All These Years. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:275–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Aldulaimi S,
    2. Mora FE
    . A primary care system to improve health care efficiency: lessons from Ecuador. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:380–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kao Y-H,
    2. Wu S-C
    . Effect of continuity of care on emergency department use in elderly patients with asthma in Taiwan. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:384–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 3
May-June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Research on Clinical Decisions Made Daily in Family Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Research on Clinical Decisions Made Daily in Family Medicine
Marjorie A. Bowman, Anne Victoria Neale, Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2017, 30 (3) 269-271; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.170125

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research on Clinical Decisions Made Daily in Family Medicine
Marjorie A. Bowman, Anne Victoria Neale, Dean A. Seehusen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2017, 30 (3) 269-271; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.170125
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Decision: Intensity of Depression Intervention
    • Decision: When to Stop Colon Cancer Screening
    • Decision: Which Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer
    • Decision: How and When to Use Telehealth in Family Medicine
    • Decision: Recognize the Real Reasons/Beliefs Behind Patient or Physician Adherence
    • Decision: How to Promote Patient-Entered Data to Increase Preventive Services
    • Decision: Use Medical Assistant Health Coaching for Lifestyle Change?
    • Decision: New Use for Dermoscopy
    • The New Genetics
    • Primary Care Workforce
    • World Perspective on Primary Care
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research on the Social Context of Medicine and the Modern Family Physician
  • Improving Health Through Family Medicine: New Opportunities, Missed Opportunities
  • Clinically Relevant Family Medicine Research: Board Certification Updates
Show more Editors' Note

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire