Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleFamily Medicine World Perspective

Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions

Eriko Onishi, Tadashi Kobayashi, Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, Tetsuhiro Maeno and Richard A. Deyo
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2017, 30 (2) 248-254; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299
Eriko Onishi
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadashi Kobayashi
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eve Dexter
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Marino
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuhiro Maeno
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Deyo
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (EO, ED, MM, RAD); the Department of General Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital, Hirosaki, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (TK); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM, RAD); the Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (TM); and the Oregon Institute for Occupational Health Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (RAD).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics of Survey Respondents and Self-Reported Frequency of Opioid* Prescribing

    Japanese Respondents (n = 435)†US Respondents (n = 198)P Value‡
    Sex<.001
        Female70 (16.4)96 (49.0)
        Male358 (83.6)100 (51.0)
    Age (years)<.001
        <40184 (43.0)57 (28.9)
        41–50132 (30.8)64 (32.5)
        51–6095 (22.2)54 (27.4)
        >6017 (1.0)22 (11.2)
    Use opioids to control acute pain§ or chronic pain‖<.001¶
        Never/seldom105 (24.1)2 (1.0)
        Occasionally to all the time330 (75.9)196 (99.0)
    Use opioids to control acute pain<0.001
        Never/seldom220 (50.6)6 (3.0)
        Occasionally to all the time215 (49.4)192 (97.0)
    Use opioids to control chronic pain<.001
        Never/seldom158 (36.3)18 (9.1)
        Occasionally to all the time277 (63.7)180 (90.9)
    Frequency of opioid use in own country**<.001
        Seldom/just right396 (93.4)9 (4.6)
        Too often28 (6.6)187 (95.4)
    Opioids are indicated for chronic pain††317 (73.9)115 (58.7)<.001‡‡
    • Data are n (%). Totals may vary because some respondents did not complete all parts of the questionnaires.

    • ↵* Opioids include tramadol, codeine, buprenorphine, pentazocine, morphine, fentanyl, methadone, and hydromorphone.

    • ↵† A total of 461 responses were received, but 26 respondents (5.4%) had no opioid prescribing license, leaving 435 prescribers to analyze.

    • ↵‡ P values from a χ2 test unless otherwise specified.

    • ↵§ Acute pain includes acute nonobstructing kidney stones and sprain or strain of any joint.

    • ↵‖ Chronic pain includes chronic nonspecific back pain, osteoarthritis of any joint, fibromyalgia, or other, similar conditions.

    • ↵¶ P value from Fisher exact test because of the small cell size.

    • ↵** Personal belief that opioids are used too seldom/used just right versus opioids are used too often.

    • ↵†† Very strongly/strongly/mildly agree versus neutral/disagree/strongly disagree.

    • ↵‡‡ P values for adjusted odds ratios.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Physician Self-Report of Factors That Influence Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain in the United States and Japan

    Agree/Strongly Agree, n (%)OR* (95% CI)P Value†
    Medically indicated
        Japan130 (52.6)1.00 (ref)—
        United States168 (86.6)5.33 (3.15–9.05)<.001
    Standard of care1.00 (ref)
        Japan66 (27.3)4.57 (2.91–7.17)—
        United States128 (66.0)<.001
    Patient expectation
        Japan121 (49.2)1.00 (ref)—
        United States89 (45.9)0.94 (0.62–1.44).790
    Maintaining patient satisfaction
        Japan119 (48.4)1.00 (ref)—
        United States98 (50.8)1.22 (0.80–1.87).360
    Legal expectation
        Japan16 (6.6)1.00 (ref)—
        United States29 (15.1)2.47 (1.22–5.04).012
    • ↵* Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated from logistic regression models that adjusted for sex (female, male) and age category (<40, 41–50, 51–60, >60 years).

    • ↵† P values for adjusted odds ratios.

    • CI, confidence interval; ref, reference category.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Self-Report of Factors That Influence Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Pain in the United States and Japan

    Agree/Strongly Agree, n (%)OR* (95% CI)P Value†
    Medically indicated
        Japan211 (69.2)1.00 (ref)—
        United States146 (75.6)1.29 (0.83–2.03).260
    Standard of care
        Japan130 (42.9)1.00 (ref)—
        United States107 (56.0)1.60 (1.07–2.39).023
    Patient expectation
        Japan193 (63.1)1.00 (ref)—
        United States109 (56.5)0.83 (0.55–1.25).380
    Maintaining patient satisfaction
        Japan201 (65.3)1.00 (ref)—
        United States103 (53.6)0.68 (0.45–1.02).061
    Legal expectation
        Japan25 (8.6)1.00 (ref)—
        United States33 (17.6)2.03 (1.09–3.77).026
    • ↵* Odds ratios (ORs) estimated from logistic regression models that adjusted for sex (female, male) and age category (<40, 41–50, 51–60, >60 years).

    • ↵† P values for adjusted odds ratios.

    • CI, confidence interval; ref, reference category.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 2
March-April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions
Eriko Onishi, Tadashi Kobayashi, Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, Tetsuhiro Maeno, Richard A. Deyo
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 30 (2) 248-254; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Patterns in the United States and Japan: Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes and Perceptions
Eriko Onishi, Tadashi Kobayashi, Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, Tetsuhiro Maeno, Richard A. Deyo
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 30 (2) 248-254; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Implementation of the American- College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain (IMPACt-LBP): protocol for a healthcare systems embedded multisite pragmatic cluster-randomised trial
  • Adoption of opioid-prescribing guidelines in primary care: a realist synthesis of contextual factors
  • Patient, Provider, and Clinic Characteristics Associated with Opioid and Non-Opioid Pain Prescriptions for Patients Receiving Low Back Imaging in Primary Care
  • Patient "Catastrophizing" Associated with Expectations of Opioid Prescriptions for Acute Pain Control
  • Satisfaction with Health Care Among Prescription Opioid Recipients
  • Chronic Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: Factors and Perspectives
  • Improving Family Medicine with Thoughtful Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-Perceived Mental Health and Perceived Discrimination in Family Physicians and Residents: A Comparative Study Between Men and Women
  • Strategies for Increasing the Role of Family Medicine in Mexican Health Care Reform
  • Family Medicine in Ethiopia: Lessons from a Global Collaboration
Show more Family Medicine World Perspective

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Acute Pain
  • Chronic Pain
  • Japan
  • Opioid Analgesics
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Oregon
  • Prescriptions
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire