Evaluating the Evidence for Choosing Wisely^TM in Primary Care Using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT)

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wolfson D,
   2. Santa J,
   3. Slass L

   . Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the Choosing Wisely campaign. Acad Med 2014;89:990–5.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   Good Stewardship Working Group. The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1385–90.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   ABIM Foundation. Choosing Wisely: about the campaign. Available from: http://www.choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/About-Choosing-Wisely.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2016.
4. 4.↵
   1. Rosenburg A,
   2. Agiro A,
   3. Gottlieb M,
   4. et al

   . Early trends among seven recommendations from the Choosing Wisely campaign. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1913–20.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Colla CH,
   2. Morden NE,
   3. Sequist TD,
   4. Schpero WL,
   5. Rosenthal M

   . Choosing Wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:221–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Howard DH,
   2. Gross GP

   . Producing evidence to reduce low-value care. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1893–4.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ebell MH,
   2. Siwek J,
   3. Weiss BD,
   4. et al

   . Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:548–56.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Gilwa C,
   2. Pearson SD

   . Evidentiary rationales for the Choosing Wisely top 5 lists. JAMA Intern Med 2014;311:1443–4.

   OpenUrl