Research in Family Medicine by Family Physicians for the Practice of Family Medicine

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kool M,
   2. Elshout G,
   3. Koes BW,
   4. Bohnen AM,
   5. Berger MY

   . C-reactive protein level as diagnostic marker in young febrile children presenting in a general practice out-of-hours service. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:460–8.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Van den Bruel A,
   2. Haj-Hassan T,
   3. Thompson M,
   4. Buntinx F,
   5. Mant D

   . European Research Network on Recognising Serious Infection investigators. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review. Lancet 2010;375:834–45.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. DeFroda SF,
   2. Lamin E,
   3. Gil JA,
   4. Sindhu K,
   5. Ritterman S

   . Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with history of total joint replacement. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:500–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Duane M,
   2. Contreras A,
   3. Jensen ET,
   4. White A

   . The performance of fertility awareness-based method apps marketed to avoid pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:508–11.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Jortberg BT,
   2. Rosen R,
   3. Roth S,
   4. et al

   . The Fit Family Challenge: a primary care childhood obesity pilot intervention. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:434–43.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Manard W,
   2. Scherrer JF,
   3. Salas J,
   4. Schneider FD

   . Patient portal use and blood pressure control in newly diagnosed hypertension. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:452–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Raffoul M,
   2. Moore M,
   3. Kamerow D,
   4. Bazemore A

   . A primary care panel size of 2500 is neither accurate nor reasonable. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:496–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Angstman KB,
   2. Horn JL,
   3. Bernard ME,
   4. et al

   . Family medicine panel size with care teams: impact on quality. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:444–51.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Meyer AND,
   2. Murphy DR,
   3. Singh H

   . Communicating findings of delayed diagnostic evaluation to primary care providers. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:469–73.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Elder N,
    2. Penm M,
    3. Pallerla H,
    4. et al

    . Provision of recommended chronic pain assessment and management in primary care: does patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition make a difference? J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:474–81.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Carlin CS,
    2. Flottemesch TJ,
    3. Solberg LI,
    4. Werner AM

    . System transformation in patient-centered medical home (PCMH): variable impact on chronically ill patients' utilization. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:482–95.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Coffman M,
    2. Moore M,
    3. Jetty A,
    4. Klink K,
    5. Bazemore A

    . Who is using telehealth in primary care? Safety net clinics and health maintenance organizations (HMOs). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:432–3.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Lin KW,
    2. Yancey JR

    . Evaluating the evidence for Choosing Wisely™ in primary care using the strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:512–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Siwek J,
    3. Weiss BD,
    4. et al

    . Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:59–67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text