Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Use of Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs) by US Primary Care Physicians

Augustine J. Sohn, John M. Hickner and Fasika Alem
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2016, 29 (3) 371-376; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150249
Augustine J. Sohn
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Hickner
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago.
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fasika Alem
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    The numbers of respondents who use or would use the point-of-care testing ≥1 time a week (black bar) among those reporting current or desired use (full bar). The percentages indicate the proportion of respondents. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ANA, antinuclear antibody; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GGT, gamma-glutamyl; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; INR, international normalized ratio; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; TSH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Top 10 Conditions for Which a Point-of Care Test Could Help Make a Diagnosis

    ConditionRespondents (N = 405)
    No.%
    Diabetes mellitus22957
    UTI22556
    Strep throat21854
    Influenza17543
    Pregnancy10325
    Anemia7218
    Infectious mononucleosis6015
    INR/anticoagulation5714
    Acute cardiac condition5514
    Lipid disorder4812
    • INR, international normalized ratio; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Top 10 Conditions for Which a Point-of Care Test Could Help Monitor or Manage

    ConditionRespondents* (N = 110)
    No.%
    Diabetes mellitus9990
    INR/anticoagulation6155
    Lipid disorder3734
    Anemia3330
    Kidney disease2725
    COPD/asthma†2018
    Hypertension1615
    Hyper-/hypothyroidism1615
    UTI1514
    Heart failure1110
    • ↵* A total of 113 respondents completed question 2; 3 reported that they did not believe that point-of-care tests could help them monitor conditions. However, the percentages are based on N = 110.

    • ↵† Spirometry.

    • COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; INR, international normalized ratio; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Conditions for Which a Point-of Care Test Would Help Reduce Referrals for Specialty Care or Hospital Admission

    ConditionRespondents (N = 100)
    No.%
    Acute cardiac condition3939
    Heart failure3131
    Pulmonary embolism2626
    Diabetes mellitus2424
    Anemia1717
    UTI1616
    COPD/asthma*1515
    Acute bronchitis1414
    Kidney disease1313
    INR/anticoagulation103
    • ↵* A total of 113 respondents completed question 3; 13 reported that they did not believe that point-of-care tests could help them reduce referrals. However, the percentages are based on N = 100.

    • † Spirometry.

    • COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; INR, international normalized ratio; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Sample Comments about the Potential Impact of Health Care Policy Changes on the Use of Point-of-Care Testing

    Response GroupSample Comments
    Believe that policy changes will increase POCT use“Yes, if there are recommendations to use these tests by established, evidence-based guidelines, they will be used.”
    “Yes, as family medicine becomes more important in the health care arena, we will need more tests to care for the total person and to refer appropriately.”
    “Yes, with patient-centered medical home.”
    “Yes, with more patients eligible for primary care, there will be more problems to diagnose and POCT will be an important tool for the primary care doctors to care for patients efficiently and at lower cost.”
    Believe that policy changes will decrease POCT use“I believe that the government will severely limit what can be done via POCT.”
    “Yes. Less reimbursement or approval. Need for prior authorization.”
    “I think POCT will be more limited due to cost.”
    “Yes, I think that CMS will begin to regulate quality control of these tests.”
    Believe that policy changes will have a mixed effect on POCT use“Yes. We need to be paid for doing the tests to make it worth the time and training hassle. The amount needs to reflect the added patient convenience of not having to do the lab.”
    • CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; POCT, point-of-care testing.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Sample Comments about Benefits of and Concerns about Point-of-Care Testing

    Response GroupSample Comments
    Benefits of POCTs“Quick answers allow immediate feedback to patients.”
    “POCTs are vital to appropriate diagnosis and appropriate management of many commonly treated conditions.”
    “I have had in house lab for years, and it has saved a few lives or reduced significant morbidity. POCT are [sic] the Future.”
    “Judicious use of POCTs in the future means overall healthcare savings.”
    “I believe changing medication doses at the time of visit is much more impactful instead of calling the patient later. Quick diagnosis of UTI, strep throat etc. also allows for appropriate quick treatment.”
    Concerns about POCT usage“Being able to monitor quality/run controls”
    “Concern of accuracy of some of these tests—false negatives and positives.”
    “Payment in a CLIA waived office is really an issue.”
    “Reimbursement [from] insurance inhibits risk to acquire equipment and maintenance needs.”
    “Only concerns would reimbursement from insurance, the initial investment cost, and regulation from the government.”
    Both benefits and concerns“They can be quite useful for patient feedback, but if they are not reliable, they are less helpful.”
    “Concerns over sensitivity and specificity of test results, helpful to be able to diagnose infections earlier, helpful to monitor critical values such as the INR more quickly.”
    “Benefit—fast result, concerns—false negative.”
    • CLIA, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments; INR, international normalized ratio; POCT, point-of-care testing; UTI, urinary tract infection.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 3
May-June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs) by US Primary Care Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Use of Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs) by US Primary Care Physicians
Augustine J. Sohn, John M. Hickner, Fasika Alem
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2016, 29 (3) 371-376; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Use of Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs) by US Primary Care Physicians
Augustine J. Sohn, John M. Hickner, Fasika Alem
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2016, 29 (3) 371-376; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150249
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Utilisation and trends of laboratory testing and point-of-care testing in primary care in Germany: an analysis of claims data
  • C-reactive protein cut-offs used for acute respiratory infections in Danish general practice
  • Impact of point-of-care panel tests in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • XW-100: First FDA CLIA-Waived CBC Analyzer Designed for Physician Office Use
  • Impact of point-of-care C reactive protein in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Social Determinants of Health and Beyond: Information to Help Family Physicians Improve Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Physicians
  • Family
  • Point-of-Care Systems

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire