Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices

Deborah J. Cohen, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Melinda Davis, Jennifer Hall, Rose Gunn, Kurt C. Stange, Larry A. Green, William L. Miller, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Mary Jane England, Khaya Clark and Benjamin F. Miller
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2015, 28 (Supplement 1) S7-S20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050
Deborah J. Cohen
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bijal A. Balasubramanian
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MBBS, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melinda Davis
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Hall
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rose Gunn
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry A. Green
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William L. Miller
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MD, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin F. Crabtree
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Jane England
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khaya Clark
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin F. Miller
From the Departments of Family Medicine and of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (DJC); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston School of Public Health (BAB); Harold Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (BAB); Oregon, Rural Practice-Based Research Network (MD); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MD, JH, RG, KC); Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Sociology and the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (LAG, BFM); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers–Robert Wood, Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ (BFC); Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public, Health, Boston, MA (MJE)
PsyD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    A case study demonstrating how the five organizing constructs intertwine to shape a practice's integration approach.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Study Data Sources and Measures and Data Collection Processes
    Primary Data TypeDescription of DataData Collection ProcessStudy
    DocumentsGrant applications and reports to TCHF (ACT only), e-mail communications, innovator presentations, and documents from innovators (scheduling templates, educational materials).For ACT, documents were collected throughout the study period and during observation visits. The Program Office and grantees share documents freely. For IWS, we collected relevant care delivery documents during site visits.ACT IWS
    Online diariesMembers from each ACT innovation team (practice) report on implementation experiences via an online journal that is shared with other members of their team and the evaluation team.Evaluation team identified 5 to 7 people in each ACT practice to post diary entries. Each team had a private online diary room. Diary keepers were asked to post every 2 wk. Evaluators interacted with diary keepers to encourage posting.ACT
    Field observationTwo 4-day visits with each practice to observe care deliveryDuring visits, 2 to 5 evaluators observed the care delivery process by shadowing clinicians, clinical support staff, and non-clinical support staff. This included observing huddles and other team meetings. During field observation, researchers took brief notes or jottings and used these to create a detailed set of field notes.ACT IWS
    InterviewsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with practice membersWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 2 to 17 practice members during field visits, depending on practice size. Practice member with on-the-ground knowledge of practice operations and relevant contextual knowledge were selected for interviews.ACT IWS
    SurveyCompleted by each practice to collect information about the organization (e.g., ownership, staffing patterns, turnover, panel characteristics)We distributed surveys to one person at each practice who worked with members of the practice to complete it. Information was returned to us either online or via paper. Survey responses were clarified with practices as needed.ACT IWS
    REACHEither an exact count or an estimate of the proportion of patients in the practice who received some level of integrated careFor ACT we developed and tailored a tracking sheet to collect REACH data. Practices collected these data for one year and shared data with us quarterly. We reviewed data with practice to determine accuracy and made corrections as needed. For IWS practices, the research team used observational to estimate REACH for each practice.ACT
    • ACT, Advancing Care Together; IWS, Integration Workforce Study; TCHF, The Colorado Health Foundation.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Organizing Principles: Conceptual and Operational Definitions
    Organizing PrinciplesConceptual DefinitionOperational Definition
    Integration REACHExtent to which integrated services are available to practice populationStrategy for identifying patient need (systematic, clinical discretion). Access to integrated care (limited, broad)
    Location of integration workforceProximity of the professionals on the integrated care teamPrimary care and behavioral health colocated; Psychiatrist co-located; PCCs and BHCs located in same team workspace
    Approach to patient transitionsStrategies that practice employs when introducing and engaging patients with another professional on the care teamWarm-handoffs and referrals
    Establish care pathwaysDetermining the level and type of care practice can provide, including care requiring referral to outside resources. Establish paths for both.Care paths for patients with more serious illness (emotional and behavioral) are identified (yes/no)
    Shared mental modelPractice members have shared understanding of practice model for integrationThe majority of practice members talk about and behave in ways that reinforce the same model for integration (yes/no)
    • View popup
    Table 3. Practice Characteristics and Organizing Constructs
    Practice ID12345678910111213141516171819
    Practice characteristics, PC/MH/BothBothBothBothPCPCPCPCPCPCClinicianHospital systemHospital systemClinicianHospital system, HMO, not for profitGovernmentHospital systemPrivate, not for profitPrivate, not for profitPrivate, not for profit
        OwnershipPrivate, not for profitPrivate, not for profitPrivatePrivate, not for profitHospital systemPrivate, not for profitClinicianPrivate, not for profitClinicianSuburbanRuralSuburbanUrbanSuburbanUrbanSuburbanRuralSuburbanRural
        SettingUrbanSuburbanUrbanSuburbanUrbanSuburbanSuburbanUrbanRural
    Financial characteristicsNoneNoneFQHCNoneNoneGovernmentFQHCCMHCCMHCCMHC
        Govt/FQHC/CMHC & FQHC/NoneFQHC/CMHCFQHC/CMHCGovernmentFQHCNoneFQHCNoneFQHCNone
        Practice revenue, %455713.4527549100.53
            Medicare7108715412446040103.970.20.2148255840
            Medicaid353822302643104959130263.6172.814.798351.229
            Commercial insurance398.22475916211695253118.9703135301428
            Uninsured1943.84656014436206 (4.8)5 (5.0)5 (3.15)22 (13.6)33 (21.9)71 (70)9 (9)6 (6)1 (0.4)*3 (2.2)
    FTE primary care clinicians, n37 (22.5)8 (6.5)56 (48.2)11 (11)7 (5.8)2 (1.2)14 (10)12 (9.9)2 (2)1 (0.5)*1 (1.0)4 (0.9)5 (1.0)†1 (0.6)6 (5.6)2 (1.4)2 (2)26 (22.8)10 (7.9)
    FTE behavioral health clinicians, n8 (7.4)4 (3.2)18 (17.4)2 (2)2 (1.6)4 (3.8)2 (0.5)*4 (2.9)1 (0.5)*15,60027,0008,37247,47627,748159,09617,68031,2004,7327,904
    Annual patient visits, n90,48010,972104,52014,92410,40010,69331,720102,9604,680YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoNo
    BHC can document in EHR?YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    Characteristics of the integration model
        Breadth and depth of integration reach
            Identification of problemSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningClinician DiscretionClinician DiscretionClinician DiscretionClinician DiscretionClinician DiscretionSystematic ScreeningSystematic ScreeningClinician DiscretionSystematic screening
            Provision of servicesLimitedBroadBroadBroadBroadLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimitedLimited
        Relevant workforce located in practice
            Embedded BHC on primary care teamNoYesYesYesYesYesNoYesNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYesNoNoYes
            Consulting psychiatrist in practiceYesYesYesNoYesYesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoIn systemIn systemIn systemIn systemyesYes
        Approach to transitioning patients to BHC
            Warm hand-offXXXXXXX
            ReferralXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
        Path identified for other services
            Specialty MHReferralReferralReferredReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralNo PathReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferral
        Substance useReferralWarm-hand off and referralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralLimitedReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferralReferral
        Shared mental model for integrationNoYesYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoYesNoNoYesYesNo
    PCPCPCPCPCBoth
    PCMHMHMH
    • BHC, behavioral health clinician; CMHC, community mental health center; EHR, electronic health record; FTE, full-time equivalent; HMO, health maintenance organization; MH, mental health. PC, primary care.

    • The designation of government for ownership or financial characteristics indicated a non-FQHC- or CMHC-funded health system where the majority of financing or ownership is from the U.S. government.

    • ↵* Due to ebbs and flows in staffing as a result of turnover and the fact that one BHC sometimes provided services to multiple practices, these are estimated FTEs.

    • ↵† These 5 BHCs were employees of a BHO and not the primary care practice. The practice contracted with the BHO, and different BHCs rotated hours in the primary care practice.

    • View popup
    Table 4. A Description of Practices' Integration Approaches (n = 19)
    Practice IDIntegration Approach
    1FQHC/CMHC within one organization. CMHC employs multiple traditional BHCs including psychiatrists. One BHC serves as a care coordinator/care manager and does the majority of BH intake assessments. BHCs are located on a different floor and isolated from PC teams. In PC, MAs systematically screen for BH needs (PHQ-2/PHQ-9), referring PC patients to BHCs as needed. BHCs provide traditional therapy; psychiatrists handle medication management. Care manager gets involved with primary care when there is a crisis and immediate access to services (same day) is needed. Refer out for SU counseling; care manager handles this referral.
    2FQHC/CMHC within one organization. Practice employs BHCs and has post-doctoral training program in psychology, but trainees do not provide majority of BH care for patients. One BHC is assigned to two PC teams, although BHCs assist other PC teams as needed. Patients systematically screened for BH needs by MA. As needs are identified, BHCs approached for warm hand-off. During hand-offs, BHCs rapidly assess patients' needs, conferring with the patient and PC team about diagnosis and treatment options. BHCs provide brief (30 min) problem-focused therapy to patients, and refer patients with SPMI to CMHC on the third floor. Consulting psychiatrist moves across PC teams and is responsible and available for consultation and assistance with medication management. BHCs conduct several group therapy sessions for patients, including for SU.
    3PC practice in integrated health system that includes a full spectrum of PC and BH services, including specialty services. Practice has hired BHCs to work with the PC teams. Patients are systematically screened for BH needs by MAs and BHCs; BHCs scrub the chart daily to identify patients coming in who might benefit from a brief checkin from the BHC. PCCs engage BHC as needed via warm handoff. BHCs rapidly assess patients' need, determine whether the patient will benefit from brief, problem-focused therapy, and provide that therapy if needed. For patients who require longer-term services, the BHCs refer the patient to the specialty MH services within the organization, including SU, and assist with the transition. The wait for these services can be long, and the BHC might provide a therapy bridge until the patient gets into specialty MH. BHCs do some therapy groups.
    4PC practice with post-doctoral training program in psychology that is the main source of BH care. Staff psychologists supervise students and provide direct care. BHCs are located throughout the building, often in close proximity to the PC teams. Initially, BHCs scrubbed charts to identify patients on the schedule whom they had not yet met, or who had a pre-existing BH need, dropping in to meet, screen, and check in on the wellbeing of these patients. Now MAs systematically screen patients. When a problem is identified, BHCs do a warm handoff, meet with the patient, and offer brief, problem-focused therapy as needed. Patients with SPMI and SU needs are referred out to a local CMHC. BHCs help with this transition.
    5PC practice that is part of a larger health system that focuses on caring for the most complex patients. The practice employs BHCs and 2 consulting psychiatrists. BHCs work closely with PC teams, taking warm hand-offs and scrubbing the chart to identify patients on the schedule who would benefit from a brief BHC visit. BHCs offer brief, problem-focused therapy. Psychiatrists are available for consults and for medication management. Patients with SU problems and SPMI are referred to other programs in the system. BHCs and other team members help with these transitions.
    6PC practice that serves a homeless population. Employs three BHCs. MAs systematically screen for BH needs (PHQ-2/PHQ-9). BHCs have isolated offices and conduct traditional therapy appointments. Onsite psychiatrist and psychiatric NP handle medication management. Warm-handoffs to the BHCs are rare as BHCs are fully scheduled. Patients with SPMI are seen in the clinic. Group therapy sessions are offered and often led by a BHC and PCCs. Practice has a therapy group called Safety Seeking for SU and PTSD.
    7PC practice affiliated with multiple PC practices in the region. BHC is hired to serve patients seen in these practices. BHC is colocated in some practices but not others. Practice does systematic screening to identify BH needs by having front desk give patients a web tablet. PCCs determine when more in-depth psychological assessment is needed. Staff conduct these assessments, the BHC reviews it, meets with the patients to formulate a diagnosis, and works with the PCC and patient to develop treatment plan, which may be carried out by the PCCs or BHC. BHC does traditional therapy. Patients in need of longer MH services and SU services are referred out.
    8PC practice with two BHCs serving multiple PC teams. MAs screen adult patients. BHCs are located in close proximity to PC teams but are backlogged and typically unavailable for warm handoffs. When a warm handoff occurs, patient can wait several weeks for a BHC appointment. This is because demand may exceed what BHCs can provide, and because BHCs are engaging in traditional therapy.
    9Small PC practice working with a local, private, not-for-profit mental health center to embed a BHC. The BHC is part time, working 1 to 2 days a week in the practice. BHC works in close proximity to the PC team. The front desk systematically screens for a range of BH needs. When the screen is positive, the MA flags this for PCCs who then talk to the patient and decide whether the BHC is needed. BHC sees patients in an examination room. BHC schedule is full, making BHC unavailable for warm handoffs or new patients. PCC is aware of this, and may handle some brief counseling him/herself. Practice has limited access and weak relationships with community resources for referral of patients in need of SU or SPMI care.
    10Small PC practice working with local CMHC to embed BHC in the clinic. BHC began part time and expanded to full time. Front desk systematically screens for BH needs. BHC is backlogged and often unavailable for warm handoffs. This may be due to greater need for BH services than BHC can manage and BHC is doing more traditional therapy. BHC handles referrals to the CMHC and other providers for those patients who need longer-term MH services including SU services. This is an effective process for patients with Medicaid. However, CMHC does not have contracts for commercially insured patients, making securing care for these patients challenging.
    11Rural PC practice. Through an arrangement with local CMHC, this practice has one embedded BHC. Clinical discretion used to identify BH needs. BHCs are backlogged and often unavailable to PCCs for warm handoffs, as BHCs are doing traditional therapy and have full schedules. Because BHCs are from a CMHC there is a clear pathway for patients with SPMI and in need of SU counseling. BHCs handle these referrals.
    12PC practice with psychology postdoctoral training program, which is the main source of BHC for practice. PCCs use clinical discretion to identify patients with BH needs. BHC interns are often unavailable to PCCs as they are not located in close proximity to PCC and they have full schedules. Thus, few warm handoffs are made. BHC interns work part time at the practice and see patients based on a referral model for traditionally scheduled therapy appointments. High-needs MH patients are referred out.
    13PC practice with embedded BHCs through an arrangement with a partnering private BH organization. Through a combination of screening during well visits, clinician discretion and BHC outreach to PC teams patients are identified who might benefit from BH services. BHC does warm handoffs and a rapid assessment of patients needs, determining whether patients will benefit from 4 to 6 sessions of brief, problem-focused therapy or if the patient has longer-term needs. BHC provides brief therapy, as needed, or refers (walks) patients in need of long-term therapy to the BH organization, which is located in the same building. Patients with SU needs are referred out to other organizations as are patients with SPMI on Medicaid or Medicare because of reimbursement challenges.
    14PC practice is part of integrated health system that includes a full spectrum of PC and MH services including specialty services. System has hired BHCs to work with PC teams. PCCs use their discretion to identify patients in need of BHC services and refer patients to the BHC using the EHR. Warm-handoffs are rare. BHCs are connected to a PC team but may not be in the same location (separated by halls or floors). BHCs do group therapy sessions, provide brief, problem-focused therapy, and help patients who need specialty MH services make that transition either to internal resources or a local CMHC (Medicaid only).
    15PC practice in integrated health system that includes a full spectrum of PC and BH services, including specialty services. System has hired BHCs to work with PC teams. PCCs use clinical discretion to identify patients who might benefit from BHC services; they will either refer patients to the BHC or arrange for a warm handoff. BHCs are connected to a PC team but may not be in the same location (separated by halls or floors). Distance limits warm handoffs. BHCs do group therapy sessions, provide brief, problem-focused therapy, and help patients who need specialty MH services make that transition.
    16PC practice in integrated health system. PC practice has an embedded BHC to work with the PC teams to do brief, problem-focused therapy. Need for BHCs exceeded FTEs available, and program was expanded to include students who help with access. Onsite SU provider added during intervention. BHCs available for warm handoffs and offer brief, problem-focused therapy to patients. Patients who need longer-term therapy and SU services are referred to another clinic in the system.
    17CMHC hired PA and MA team to serve its patients, and to expand its services to a non-SPMI population. The practice systematically screens its patients to identify physical and behavioral health needs. SPMI patients come to PA by referral from therapist, case managers, or self. Therapists ask patients, including those with SPMI, whether they have a PCC provider. Those without a PCC are offered help in getting them connected with one. The PA, health navigator, or health coach treats patients seeing PC team who are identified with mild to moderate BH needs. Therapists in the clinic treat patients with SPMI and SU needs. PA has > 15 y practicing in the community and has connections with medical specialty care providers.
    18CMHC serving people with SPMI. MH clinicians use their discretion to identify patients who need PCCs and refer these patients to a Care Coordinator. The Care Coordinator assists referred patients with paper work, which must be done prior to the PCC visit. Once completed, Care Coordinator schedules appointment with PCC. PC team is composed of a PA, MA, Care Coordinator, and SU counselor. The PA and MA are on contract with a local FQHC, the SU counselor is on contract with a local SU rehabilitation organization. PC team travels together across 3 CMHC sites. PC team handles the majority of physical health needs as well as likely some mild to moderate BH needs, and refers patients to medical specialists in the community as needed. Because PA works for an FQHC, specialists are easily identified.
    19CMHC hired PCC, MA, and front desk team to serve its patients, and expanded services to a non-SPMI population. Practice systematically screens patients using web tablet distributed at front desk to identify physical and BH needs. In addition to the BHCs providing traditional therapy, 1 BHC is embedded on PC team to provide integrated care. Patients with SPMI and SU needs are seen in this practice through individual and group therapy. PC team handles majority of patients' physical health needs but refers out to specialists in the community as needed.
    • Abbreviations: BH, behavioral health; BHC, behavioral health clinician; CMHC, community mental health center; EHR, electronic health record; FQHC, federally qualified health center; FTE, full-time equivalent; MA, medical assistant; MH, mental health; NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; PC, primary care; PCC, primary care clinician; PHQ2/PHQ9, screening tools for depression; SPMI, serious and persistent mental illness; SU, substance use.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Shared mental model for integration and close proximity of BHC and PCCs shapes use of warm handoffs and REACH of integration program among a group of practices with similar characteristics
    Practice ID21453
    Practice Characteristics
        PC/MHPC/MHPC/MHPCPCPC/MH
        OwnershipPrivate, not for profitPrivate, not for profitPrivate, not for profitHospital systemPrivate
        Govt/FQHC/CMHC & FQHC/NoneFQHC/CMHCFQHC/CMHCFQHCNoneGovernment
    Characteristics of the integration model
        Breadth and depth of Integration REACH
            Identification of problemSystematic screeningSystematic screeningSystematic screeningSystematic screeningSystematic screening
            Provision of servicesBroadLimitedBroadBroadBroad
        Relevant workforce located in practice
            Embedded BHC on PCC teamYesNoYesYesYes
            Consulting psychiatrist in practiceYesYesNoYesYes
        Approach to transitioning patients to BHC
            Warm-handoffXXXX
            ReferralXX
        Path identified for other services
            Specialty MHReferralReferralReferralReferralReferred
            Substance UseWarm-handoff and referralReferralReferralReferralReferral
        Shared Mental Model for IntegrationYesNoYesYesYes
    • Abbreviations: BHC, behavioral health clinician; CMHC, community mental health center; FQHC, federally qualified health center; FTE, full-time equivalent; MH, mental health; PC, primary care; PCC, primary care clinician.

    • The designation of Government for ownership or financial characteristics indicated a non-FQHC- or CMHC-funded health system where the majority of financing or ownership is from the U.S. government.

    • The bold values listed for Practice 1 are to indicate how constructs such as physical distance among professionals and lack of a shared mental model can influence the approach to integrated care, despite practice characteristics that support broader integration approaches in other settings.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (Supplement 1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue Supplement 1
September-October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices
Deborah J. Cohen, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Melinda Davis, Jennifer Hall, Rose Gunn, Kurt C. Stange, Larry A. Green, William L. Miller, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Mary Jane England, Khaya Clark, Benjamin F. Miller
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 28 (Supplement 1) S7-S20; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices
Deborah J. Cohen, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Melinda Davis, Jennifer Hall, Rose Gunn, Kurt C. Stange, Larry A. Green, William L. Miller, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Mary Jane England, Khaya Clark, Benjamin F. Miller
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 28 (Supplement 1) S7-S20; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Treatment Differences in Primary and Specialty Settings in Veterans with Major Depression
  • Uniting Public Health and Primary Care for Healthy Communities in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond
  • Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) Tool for Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care
  • Change is in the Wind: What research tells us about the future of dental hygiene
  • Outcomes of Integrated Behavioral Health with Primary Care
  • From Our Practices to Yours: Key Messages for the Journey to Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Holding On and Letting Go: A Perspective from the Keystone IV Conference
  • Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care
  • Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care: Consulting, Coordinating and Collaborating Among Professionals
  • Strategies to Support the Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care: What Have We Learned Thus Far?
  • Advancing Care Together by Integrating Primary Care and Behavioral Health
  • Preparing the Workforce for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration
  • Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care
  • REACH of Interventions Integrating Primary Care and Behavioral Health
  • Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Integrated
  • Practice-based Research
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire