Research ArticleSpecial Communications

Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs)

L. Miriam Dickinson, Brenda Beaty, Chet Fox, Wilson Pace, W. Perry Dickinson, Caroline Emsermann and Allison Kempe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2015, 28 (5) 663-672; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Krist A,
    4. Crosson J,
    5. Likumahuwa S,
    6. DeVoe JE
    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:759–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Vinson C,
    3. Chambers D,
    4. Khoury MJ,
    5. Kaplan RM,
    6. Hunter C
    . National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 2012;102:1274–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cocannon TW,
    2. Guise JM,
    3. Dolor RJ,
    4. et al
    . A national strategy to develop pragmatic clinical trials infrastructure. Clin Transl Sci 2014;7:164–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tunis SR,
    2. Stryer DB,
    3. Clancy CM
    . Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ivers NM,
    2. Halperin IJ,
    3. Barnsley J,
    4. et al
    . Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials. 2012;13:120.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ivers NM,
    2. Taljaard M,
    3. Dixon S,
    4. et al
    . Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000–8. BMJ 2011;343:d5886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Eldridge SM,
    2. Ashby D,
    3. Bennett C,
    4. Wakelin M,
    5. Feder G
    . Internal and external validity of cluster randomized trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ 2008;336:876–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eldridge SM,
    2. Ashby D,
    3. Feder GS,
    4. Rudnicka AR,
    5. Uloumunne OC
    . Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 2004;1:80–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Donner A,
    2. Klar N
    . Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Alexander FE,
    2. Roberts MM,
    3. Lutz W,
    4. Hepburn W
    . Randomization by cluster and the problem of social class bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 1989;43:29–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shah S,
    2. Peat JK,
    3. Mazurski EJ,
    4. et al
    . Effect of peer led programme for asthma education in adolescents: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2001;322:583–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Carman WF,
    2. Elder AG,
    3. Wallace LA,
    4. et al
    . Effects of influenza vaccination of health-care workers on mortality of elderly people in long-term care: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:93–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Solomon DH,
    2. Polinski JM,
    3. Stedman M,
    4. et al
    . Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:362–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Puffer S,
    2. Torgerson D,
    3. Watson J
    . Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomized trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 2003;327:785–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Chapman S,
    2. Cornwall J,
    3. Righetti J,
    4. Sung L
    . Preventing dog bites in children: randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention. BMJ 2000;320:1512–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhao W,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Palesch Y
    . Minimal sufficient balance–a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 January 26 [Epub ahead of print]
  17. 17.↵
    1. Raab GM,
    2. Butcher I
    . Balance in cluster randomized trials. Stat Med 2001;20:351–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kraschnewski JL,
    2. Keyserling TC,
    3. Bangdiwala SI,
    4. et al
    . Optimized probability sampling of study sites to improve generalizability in a multisite intervention trial. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7:A10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Glynn RJ,
    2. Brookhart A,
    3. Stedman M,
    4. Avorn J,
    5. Solomon DH
    . Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers. Med Care 2007;45(10 Suppl 2):S38–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Moulton LH
    . Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials. Clin Trials 2004;1:297–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chaudhary MA,
    2. Moulton LH
    . A SAS macro for constrained randomization of group-randomized designs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;83:205–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Carter BR,
    2. Hood K
    . Balance algorithm for cluster randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Beaty B,
    2. Dickinson LM
    . Adjusting clustering: minimize your suffering! Improving balance in baseline covariates in cluster randomized trials. Available from: http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings14/1570-2014.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2015.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Perry M,
    2. Faes M,
    3. Reelick MF,
    4. Olde Rikkert MG,
    5. Borm GF
    . Studywise minimization: A treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;62:1118–22.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Xiao L,
    2. Lavori PW,
    3. Wilson SR,
    4. Ma J
    . Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study. Clin Trials 2011;8:59–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Giraudeau B,
    2. Ravaud P
    . Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000065.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kempe A,
    2. Saville AW,
    3. Dickinson LM,
    4. et al
    . Collaborative centralized reminder/recall to increase immunization rates for populations of young children: a comparative effectiveness trial. JAMA Pediatr. In press.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Fox CH,
    2. Vest BM,
    3. Kahn LS,
    4. et al
    . Improving evidence-based primary care for chronic kidney disease: Study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial for translating evidence into practice (TRANSLATE CKD). Implement Sci 2013;8:88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Dickinson WP,
    2. Dickinson LM,
    3. Nutting PA,
    4. et al
    . Practice facilitation to improve diabetes care in primary care: a report from the EPIC randomized clinical trial. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:8–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dickinson LM,
    2. Dickinson WP,
    3. Nutting PA,
    4. et al
    . Practice context affects efforts to improve diabetes care for primary care patients: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:476–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Nietert PJ,
    2. Jenkins RG,
    3. Nemeth LS,
    4. Ornstein SM
    . An application of a modified constrained randomization process to a practice-based cluster randomized trial to improve colorectal cancer screening. Contemp Clin Trials 2009;30:129–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords