Using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) Model in Clinical Research: Application to Refine a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Study

References

1. 1.↵
   Institute of Medicine National Research Council. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. 2.↵
   1. Zerhouni EA

   . Translational and clinical science–time for a new vision. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1621–3.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Thorpe KE,
   2. Zwarenstein M,
   3. Oxman AD,
   4. et al

   . A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:464–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Zwarenstein M,
   2. Treweek S,
   3. Gagnier JJ,
   4. et al

   ; CONSORT Group; Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare (Practihc) Group. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008;337:a2390.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   Institute of Medicine National Research Council. Envisioning a transformed clinical trials enterprise in the United States: establishing an agenda for 2020: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
6. 6.↵
   Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Pre-announcement: large pragmatic trials to evaluate comparative clinical effectiveness. December 2013. Available from: http://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities/. Accessed September 24, 2014.
7. 7.↵
   1. Peikes D GK,
   2. Wang W

   . Using pragmatic clinical trials to test the effectiveness of patient-centered medical home models in real-world settings. AHRQ publication no. 13–0030-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
8. 8.↵
   Standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE). Lebanon (NH): Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; 2010.
9. 9.↵
   1. Koppenaal T,
   2. Linmans J,
   3. Knottnerus JA,
   4. Spigt M

   . Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1095–101.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Gaglio B,
    3. Bennett G,
    4. et al

    . Applying the PRECIS criteria to describe three effectiveness trials of weight loss in obese patients with comorbid conditions. Health Serv Res 2012;47(3 Pt 1):1051–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Sackett D

    . PrECIs (pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicators): “Spokes.” Available from: http://support-collaboration.org/precis.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2014.
12. 12.↵
    1. Riddle DL,
    2. Johnson RE,
    3. Jensen MP,
    4. et al

    . The Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) instrument was useful for refining a randomized trial design: experiences from an investigative team. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1271–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bratton DJ,
    2. Nunn AJ,
    3. Wojnarowska F,
    4. Kirtschig G,
    5. Sandell A,
    6. Williams HC

    . The value of the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary wheel in an ongoing study: the bullous pemphigoid steroids and tetracyclines study. Trials 2012;13:50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Munk N,
    2. Stewart K,
    3. Love MM,
    4. Carter E,
    5. Elder WG

    . Intersection of massage practice and research: community massage therapists as research personnel on an NIH-funded effectiveness study. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2014;7:10–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed