Practice-based Research Networks at the Crossroads of Research Translation

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Green LA,
   2. Hickner J

   . A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:1–10.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Thorpe KE,
   2. Zwarenstein M,
   3. Oxman AD,
   4. et al

   . A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:464–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Robitaille H,
   2. Légaré F,
   3. Tre G

   . A systematic process for recruiting physician-patient dyads in practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:740–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Dolor RJ,
   2. Schmit KM,
   3. Graham DG,
   4. Fox CH,
   5. Baldwin LM

   . Guidance for researchers developing and conducting clinical trials in practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:750–8.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Spears W,
   2. Tsoh JY,
   3. Potter MB,
   4. et al

   . Use of community engagement strategies to increase research participation in practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:763–71.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Riddell MC,
   2. Sandford KG,
   3. Johnson AO,
   4. Steltenkamp C,
   5. Pearce KA

   . Achieving meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) in primary care: proposed critical processes from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:772–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Bauer AM,
   2. Rue T,
   3. Keppel GA,
   4. Cole AM,
   5. Baldwin LM,
   6. Katon W

   . Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools by primary care patients in the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:780–8.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Green BB,
   2. Anderson ML,
   3. Wang CY,
   4. et al

   . Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:789–95.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Tyler CV,
   2. Werner JJ

   . Community-engagement strategies of the Developmental Disabilities Practice-Based Research Network (DD-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:831–8.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Cacy DS,
    3. Dalbir DK

    . Management of laboratory test results in family practice. An OKPRN study. Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. J Fam Pract 2000;49:709–15.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. West DR,
    2. James KA,
    3. Fernald DH,
    4. Zelie C,
    5. Smith ML,
    6. Raab SS

    . Laboratory medicine handoff gaps experienced by primary care practices: a report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:796–803.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Cardinali G,
    2. Rhyne RL,
    3. Fleg A,
    4. et al

    . Underinsurance before the implementation of the affordable care act: from the Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:855–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Krist A,
    4. Crosson J,
    5. Likumahuwa S,
    6. DeVoe JE

    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:759–62.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Angier H,
    2. Likumahuwa S,
    3. Finnegan S,
    4. et al

    . Using geographic information systems (GIS) to identify communities in need of health insurance outreach: an OCHIN practice-based research network (PBRN) report. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:804–10.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Werner JJ,
    2. Stange KC

    . Praxis-based research networks: an emerging paradigm for research that is rigorous, relevant, and inclusive. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:730–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Phillips RL Jr.,
    2. Kaufman A,
    3. Mold JW,
    4. et al

    . The primary care extension program: a catalyst for change. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:173–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. van Mourik Y,
    2. Bertens LCM,
    3. Cramer MJ,
    4. et al

    . Unrecognized heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in frail elderly detected through a near-home targeted screening strategy. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:811–21.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Ravi A,
    2. Prine L,
    3. Waltermaurer E,
    4. Miller N,
    5. Rubin SE

    . Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:822–30.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    Defining primary care: an interim report. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 1994.
20. 20.↵
    1. Etz RS,
    2. Hahn KA,
    3. Gonzalez MM,
    4. Crabtree BF,
    5. Stange KC

    . Practice-based innovations: more relevant and transportable than NIH-funded studies. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:738–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Doohan NC,
    2. Endres J,
    3. Koehn N,
    4. et al

    . Back to the future: reflections on the history of the future of family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:839–45.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text