Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleArticle

Primary Medical Care in the United Kingdom

Martin Roland, Bruce Guthrie and David Colin Thomé
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2012, 25 (Suppl 1) S6-S11; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110200
Martin Roland
DM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Guthrie
MB, BChir, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Colin Thomé
MB, BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    NHS Information Centre. General and Personal Medical Services England 2000–2010. Leeds: NHS Information Centre; 2010. Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/010_Workforce/nhsstaff0010/GP/General_Practice_Bulletin_2000–2010.pdf
  2. 2.↵
    1. Laurent M,
    2. Reeves D,
    3. Hermens R,
    4. Braspenning J,
    5. Grol R,
    6. Sibbald B
    . Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(2):CD001271.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Griffiths P,
    2. Murrells T,
    3. Maben J,
    4. Jones S,
    5. Ashworth M
    . Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:36–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    NHS Information Centre. 2006/07 UK General Practice Workload Survey. Leeds: NHS Information Centre; 2007. Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/primary-care/general-practice/gp-workload-survey. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schoen C,
    2. Osborn R,
    3. Squires D,
    4. Doty M,
    5. Pierson R,
    6. Applebaum S
    . 2011 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey. Available at www.commonwealthfund.org/Surveys/2011/Nov/2011-International-Survey.aspx. Accessed February 1, 2012.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Walshe K,
    3. Hunter D
    . The redisorganisation of the NHS. BMJ 2001;323:1262–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Oxman A,
    2. Sackett D,
    3. Chalmers I,
    4. Prescott T
    . A surrealistic meta-analysis of redisorganization theories. J R Soc Med 2005;98:563–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Richards S,
    2. Pound P,
    3. Dickens A,
    4. Greco M,
    5. Campbell J
    . Exploring users' experiences of accessing out-of-hours primary medical care services. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:469–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    The Commonwealth Fund. All surveys. Available at http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Surveys/View-All.aspx. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wagner E,
    2. Reid R
    . Are continuity of care and teamwork incompatible? Med Care 2007;45:6–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Guthrie B,
    2. Wyke S
    . Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Baker D,
    2. Middleton E
    . Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:417–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Middleton E,
    2. Baker J
    . Comparison of social distribution of immunisation with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, England, 1991–2001. BMJ 2003;326:854.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    UK Department of Health. Publications policy and guidance. A first class service: quality in the new NHS. July 1998. Available at www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/Publications PolicyAndGuidance/DH_4006902. Accessed February 28, 2011.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Buetow S,
    2. Roland M
    . Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care. Qual Health Care 1999;8:184–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. 16.↵
    1. Campbell SM,
    2. Sheaff R,
    3. Sibbald B,
    4. et al
    . Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:9–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Campbell SM,
    2. Roland MO,
    3. Middleton E,
    4. Reeves D
    . Improvements in the quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998–2003: longitudinal observational study BMJ 2005;331:1121–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Roland M
    . Linking physician pay to quality of care: a major experiment in the UK. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1448–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Doran T,
    2. Fullwood C,
    3. Reeves D,
    4. Gravelle H,
    5. Roland M
    . Should physicians be able to exclude individual patients from pay-for-performance targets? Analysis of exception reporting in the English pay-for-performance scheme. N Engl J Med 2008;359:274–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Roland M,
    2. Elliott M,
    3. Lyratzopoulos G,
    4. et al
    . Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. BMJ 2009;339:b3851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Campbell SM,
    2. Reeves D,
    3. Kontopantelis E,
    4. Sibbald B,
    5. Roland M
    . Effects of pay-for-performance on the quality of primary care in England. N Engl J Med 2009;361:368–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Doran T,
    2. Fullwood C,
    3. Kontopantelis E,
    4. Reeves D
    . Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. Lancet 2008;372:728–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Grant S,
    2. Huby G,
    3. Watkins F,
    4. et al
    . The impact of pay-for-performance on professional boundaries in UK general practice: an ethnographic study. Sociol Health Illn 2009;31:229–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. McDonald R,
    2. Harrison S,
    3. Checkland K,
    4. Campbell SM,
    5. Roland M
    . Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. BMJ 2007;334:1357–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. McDonald R,
    2. Checkland K,
    3. Harrison S,
    4. Coleman A
    . Rethinking collegiality: restratification in English general medical practice 2004–2008. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:1199–205.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Checkland K,
    2. Harrison S
    . The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework on practice organisation and service delivery: summary of evidence from two qualitative studies. Qual Prim Care 2010;18:139–46.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Leydon GM,
    2. Dowrick CF,
    3. McBride AS,
    4. et al
    . Questionnaire severity measures for depression: a threat to the doctor-patient relationship? Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:117–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Steel N,
    2. Maisey S,
    3. Clark A,
    4. Fleetcroft R,
    5. Howe A
    . Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:449–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Doran T,
    2. Kontopantelis E,
    3. Valderas J,
    4. et al
    . Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. BMJ 2011;342:d3590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dusheiko M,
    2. Doran T,
    3. Gravelle H,
    4. Fullwood C,
    5. Roland M
    . Does higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions? Health Serv Res 2011;46(1 Pt 1):27–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mangin D,
    2. Toop L
    . The Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have you done to yourselves? Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:435–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    The King's Fund. Improving the quality of care in general practice: report of an independent inquiry commissioned by The King's Fund. Updated April 2011. Available at www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/gp_inquiry_report.html. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Roland M,
    2. Rosen R
    . Healthcare reform: the English NHS embarks on controversial and risky market style reforms. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1360–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    UK Department of Health. Government response to the NHS Future Forum report. June 2011. Available at www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_127719.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Wyke S,
    2. Mays N,
    3. Street A,
    4. Bevan G,
    5. McLeod H,
    6. Goodwin N
    . Should general practitioners purchase health care for their patients? The total purchasing experiment in Britain. Health Policy 2003;65:243–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Mays N,
    3. Dixon J,
    4. et al
    . A review of the effectiveness of primary care-led commissioning and its place in the NHS health foundation. 2004. Available at www.health.org.uk/publications/research_reports/effectiveness_nhs.html. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  37. 37.↵
    1. Harrison S,
    2. Checkland K,
    3. Coleman A
    . Practice-based commissioning in the English National Health Service: evidence and prospects. In: House of Commons Health Committee. Commissioning: fourth report of session 2009–10. Volume 2: oral and written evidence. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2010:86–90. Available at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmhealth/268/268ii.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  38. 38.↵
    1. Greer SL
    . Four way bet: how devolution has led to four different models for the NHS. London: University College London, Constitution Unit; 2004.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Nolte E
    . International benchmarking of healthcare quality: a review of the literature. 2010. Available at www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR738.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2012.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Hippisley-Cox J,
    2. Vinogradova Y
    . Trends in consultation rates in general practice 1995 to 2008: analysis of the QResearch database. Leeds: NHS Information Centre; 2009. Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/gp/Trends_in_Consultation_Rates_in_General_Practice_1995_2008.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2012.
  41. 41.↵
    NHS Information Centre. GP workload survey. July 2007, Available at http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/gp/GP%20Workload%20Report.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2012.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (Suppl 1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue Suppl 1
March-April 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Medical Care in the United Kingdom
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Medical Care in the United Kingdom
Martin Roland, Bruce Guthrie, David Colin Thomé
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 25 (Suppl 1) S6-S11; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Primary Medical Care in the United Kingdom
Martin Roland, Bruce Guthrie, David Colin Thomé
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2012, 25 (Suppl 1) S6-S11; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110200
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Primary Care Models and Payment Systems
    • Key Lessons
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Exploring rural Scottish GPs migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout
  • Patient characteristics associated with enrolment under voluntary programs implemented within fee-for-service systems in British Columbia and Quebec: a cross-sectional study
  • What are the most common conditions in primary care?: Systematic review
  • Do baby boomers use more healthcare services than other generations? Longitudinal trajectories of physician service use across five birth cohorts
  • Research into practice: accessing primary care
  • Comparison of health confidence in rural, suburban and urban areas in the UK and the USA: a secondary analysis
  • International Learning on Increasing the Value and Effectiveness of Primary Care (I LIVE PC)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Mentoring for the Diverse Range of Family Physicians’ Engagement in Research
  • Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets
  • Building a Culture of Curiosity in Family Medicine to Increase Research Capacity
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire