Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Weight Status and Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk

Heather Bittner Fagan, Randa Sifri, Richard Wender, Elena Schumacher and James F. Reed
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2012, 25 (6) 792-797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.120017
Heather Bittner Fagan
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE (HBF, JFR); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (RS, RW); the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center; and Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (ES).
MD, MPH, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randa Sifri
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE (HBF, JFR); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (RS, RW); the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center; and Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (ES).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Wender
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE (HBF, JFR); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (RS, RW); the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center; and Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (ES).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Schumacher
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE (HBF, JFR); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (RS, RW); the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center; and Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (ES).
RD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James F. Reed III
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE (HBF, JFR); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia (RS, RW); the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center; and Academic Affairs, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (ES).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Obesity increases the risk of many cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: This is secondary data analysis of the 2010 National Health Interview Survey data. A total of 9360 obese and overweight participants, aged 50 to 80 years, were analyzed according to their perception of their personal cancer risk.

Results: Having a perception of increased risk for cancer was associated with higher CRC screening rates. However, when compared with their normal-weight counterparts, overweight and obese individuals did not perceive themselves as being at an increased risk for cancer in general or for CRC specifically. Subgroup analysis revealed one notable exception. Obese black women appeared to recognize themselves as being at higher risk for CRC.

Conclusions: Most obese and overweight individuals fail to recognize their increased cancer risk. Individuals who perceive themselves as being at increased risk for cancer, especially CRC, are more likely to have undergone CRC screening. Unfortunately, obese and overweight individuals do not seem to recognize the increased cancer risk conferred by their body weight. Education is needed so that obese and overweight individuals are aware that their excess body weight is a risk factor for cancer.

  • Cancer Risk
  • Colon/Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Obesity
  • Weight Status

An estimated 68% of US adults are either obese or overweight.1 Obesity is associated with an increased risk for several types of cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Obesity is second only to tobacco as a modifiable risk factor for cancer.2 It has been estimated that >41,000 cancer cases per year are due to obesity.3 The relative risk of CRC for both men and women increases as body mass index (BMI) increases. Relative risk for CRC in men is 1 in 20 when BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, 1.47 when BMI is 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2, and 1.84 when BMI is 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2. Relative risk for CRC in women is 1 in 10 when BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, 1.33 when BMI is 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2, 1.36 when BMI is 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m2, and 1.46 when BMI is ≥40.0 kg/m2.4

Thus, there is increasing interest in promoting healthy weight through healthy eating and physical activity as a cancer prevention strategy. In addition, there may be a reason for increased diligence in cancer screening in the overweight and obese population. If individuals at higher weight recognize themselves as being at higher risk for cancer, they will, arguably, be more likely to screen for CRC or other cancers. Many models of behavior change suppose that perception of risk is a motivator of action related to preventive behavior, including behavior related to cancer prevention.5⇓–7 However, many individuals may not recognize obesity as an important and modifiable risk factor for cancer.8

The purpose of this study is to determine if overweight and obese individuals recognize a higher personal risk for cancer in general and for CRC specifically. Prior research indicates that men and women perceive their weight differently9; likewise, nonwhite minorities also view their weight differently than whites.10,11 Therefore, subgroup analysis is completed to see if cancer risk perception is different in women or blacks.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study analyzing data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative survey of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The National Health Interview Survey is a cross-sectional household interview survey. The sampling plan follows a multistage area probability design that permits the representative sampling of households and noninstitutional group quarters (eg, college dormitories) and oversamples of blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. This complex survey design allows for population estimates of the United States.12

Participants

The National Health Interview Survey respondents in this study were individuals aged ≥50 years old because CRC screening would be recommended for these individuals according to the American Cancer Society.13 Individuals >80 years of age were excluded, acknowledging that there is some controversy regarding the age at which CRC screening should be discontinued. Within this participant group, the association between perception of cancer risk and a particular behavior, CRC screening, could be analyzed, therefore demonstrating an association between perception of risk and an action to mitigate that risk.

Variables

Perception of Increased Cancer Risk

Perception of cancer risk was self-reported as “more than the average person,” “approximately the same as the average person,” or “less than the average person” for both cancer in general and for CRC specifically. Individuals who answered “more than the average person” were classified as having a perception of increased cancer risk; individuals who answered “approximately the same as the average person” or “less than the average person” were classified as not having a perception of increased risk.

Weight Status

Obesity was defined according to BMI, which was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2).14 Due to small sample size, underweight individuals were excluded.15

CRC Screening

We examined the self-reported variables related to endoscopy, stool blood testing, and test date. The outcome variable of overall CRC screening status was defined as up to date in individuals who had one of the following screening tests: colonoscopy within the last 10 years, sigmoidoscopy in the last 5 years, or fecal occult blood test within the last year.13 To be included, an individual must have had complete answers (both test and date) to at least one of the aforementioned screening test questions.

Covariates

We examined the potential confounding variables of age (50–59, 60–69, 70–79 years); education (<12 years, high school graduate, some college, college graduate); marital status (married, unmarried); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black); health status (fair/poor, excellent/good); income (<$20,000, $20,000–$25,000, $35,000–$55,000, $55,000–$75,000, $75,000+); insurance status (yes/no); office visits in the last year (none, one, 2–5, ≥6); regular source of medical care (yes/no); smoking status (current, former, never); physician recommendation (yes/no); alcohol use (none, light to moderate, heavy); number of comorbidities (zero, one, 2–3, 4–5, ≥6); family history defined as any primary relative with a cancer diagnosis (yes/no); personal history of cancer (yes/no); and physician recommendation (yes/no).

Results

Selection criteria for this study included the following: age between 50 and 79 and nonmissing data for BMI, colorectal screening, perceived risk of cancer, and perceived risk of colon cancer. Using this selection criteria, there were 9360 eligible participants with “nonmissing” data. We assumed that missing data were missing at random and therefore would not affect the subsequent analyses.

Table 1 demonstrates the demographics of our population according to weight status and according to several known predictors of CRC screening. In the adjusted analysis (not shown), only family history and smoking status were significant predictors for perception of cancer risk. These variables were incorporated in the adjusted analysis of the outcome CRC screening examined in Table 2. Table 2 examines the outcome of CRC screening according to perception of risk. Having a perception of increased cancer risk in general is associated with increased CRC screening (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.47–1.87). Likewise, having a perception of increased cancer risk, specifically for CRC, is strongly associated with increased CRC screening (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.33–3.15). Table 3 shows perception of cancer risk according to weight status. There is no association between weight status, being overweight or obese, with having a perception of increased cancer risk in general or for CRC specifically. Table 4 stratifies the outcome of perception of increased cancer risk according to race and sex. With the exception of obese black females, there are no significant associations between weight status and perception of increased cancer risk. We did not include those who self-identify as Hispanic in Table 4 due to a small sample size.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Participants According to Weight Status (n = 9360)
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2. Perception of Increased Cancer Risk Is Associated with CRC Screening (n = 8334)
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3. Perception of Cancer Risk According to Weight Status (n = 9360)
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4. Association between Perception of Cancer Risk and Weight Status According to Sex and Race (n = 9360, Subdivided into Groups)

Discussion

Our work demonstrates that perception of cancer risk is associated with higher CRC screening rates, supporting the theoretical link between perceived risk and an individual's likelihood to take action to prevent cancer. However, overweight and obese individuals, in this study, do not perceive themselves to be at higher risk for cancer in general nor for CRC specifically. This finding may illustrate an important gap in public health knowledge. If individuals recognize increased weight as a modifiable risk factor for cancer, they may be motivated to make lifestyle changes or at least be more diligent regarding screening. Obese and overweight individuals who fail to recognize an increase in their own personal risk for cancer may be less likely to engage in cancer prevention behavior and less likely to be positively influenced by cancer prevention messages.

Of interest, Finkelstein et al16 found that obese persons do perceive their life expectancy to be shorter because of their weight status. They also found that obese persons regard themselves at a higher risk for cancer than normal-weight individuals. However, this study did not control for family history or smoking history. We found these factors to be significant predictors of risk perception as did Honda and Neugut in 2004.17 This is an important distinction because weight is modifiable unlike family history or a history of smoking.

These data show one notable exception. Obese black women do appear to see themselves as being at higher risk for CRC. This is somewhat consistent with the literature, which shows that women were more likely than men to see their weight as a health risk.10 Likewise, the literature supports that obese individuals are more likely to see their weight as a problem compared with overweight individuals.18 However, it is unclear why black and not white women perceive this risk when, ironically, some data indicate that the link between obesity and cancer risk is weakest in black women.19 Perhaps black women perceive a higher CRC risk because they more often see the diagnosis made in family members. Kim et al20 found that family history was a predictor of perceived risk for CRC among a group of diverse women. The opposite trend, although not statistically significant, is seen in black men, in which obese black men see themselves as at decreased risk for cancer compared with nonobese black men. Black men have the highest incidence of colon cancer irrespective of weight status with 62.0 of 100,000 black men diagnosed in 2007.21 This is especially concerning given that an increased risk of colon cancer with obesity has been shown more consistently in men than women.22⇓–24 Unfortunately, small sample size precluded our ability to examine the subgroup of Hispanic individuals.

Public health education needs to incorporate cancer risk into education programs for weight loss and obesity prevention and more research needs to be done on cancer risk perception in obese individuals. Educating the public of their increased cancer risk with obesity should be a priority, because obese persons may not fully comprehend this health risk. Current attempts at lowering obesity are not working. If fear of a cancer diagnosis is motivational, then by making more people aware of the increased cancer risk with obesity may encourage behavior changes conducive to decreasing cancer risk.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: This work was supported by the Cancer Control Career Development Award 115834-CCCDA-08-107-01-CCCDA from the American Cancer Society.

  • Conflict of interest: none declared.

  • Received for publication January 19, 2012.
  • Revision received August 8, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication August 13, 2012.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Flegal KM,
    2. Carroll MD,
    3. Ogden CL,
    4. Curtin LR
    . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2011. Available at: www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsfigures/cancerfactsfigures/cancer-facts- figures-2011. Updated 2011. Accessed August 1, 2011.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Polednak AP
    . Trends in incidence rates for obesity-associated cancers in the US. Cancer Detect Prev 2003;27:415–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Calle EE,
    2. Rodriguez C,
    3. Walker-Thurmond K,
    4. Thu MJ
    . Overweight, obesity and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of US adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Glanz K,
    2. Rimer BK,
    3. Lewis FM
    1. Janz NK,
    2. Champion VL,
    3. Strecher VJ
    . The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM editors. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002, p. 45–66.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cameron LD,
    2. Leventhal H
    1. Myers RE
    . Self regulation and decision-making about cancer screening. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge; 2003. p. 297–313.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Myers RE
    . Decision counseling in cancer prevention and control. Health Psychol. 2005;24(suppl):S71–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cameron M,
    2. Scully M,
    3. Herd N,
    4. Jamsen K,
    5. Hill D,
    6. Wakefield M
    . The role of overweight and obesity in perceived risk factors for cancer: implications for education. J Cancer Educ 2010;25:506–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gregory CO,
    2. Blanck HM,
    3. Gillespie C,
    4. Maynard LM,
    5. Serdula MK
    . Perceived health risk of excess body weight among overweight and obese men and women: differences by sex. Prev Med. 2008;47: 46–52.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Anderson LA,
    2. Eyler AA,
    3. Galuska DA,
    4. Brown DR,
    5. Brownson RC
    . Relationship of satisfaction with body size and trying to lose weight in a national survey of overweight and obese women aged 40 and older, United States. Prev Med. 2002;35:390–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fitzgibbon ML,
    2. Blackman LR,
    3. Avellone ME
    . The relationship between body image discrepancy and body mass index across ethnic groups. Obes Res 2000;8:582–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)—description. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Updated 2011. Accessed August 1, 2011.
  13. 13.↵
    American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures special edition 2005. Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2005. p. 1–19.
  14. 14.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of colorectal cancer tests–united states, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:253–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and trends data—adults who are current smokers. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/brfss.html. Updated 2007. Accessed April 9, 2009.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Finkelstein EA,
    2. Brown DS,
    3. Evans WD
    . Do obese persons comprehend their personal health risks? Am J Health Behav 2008;32:508–16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Honda K,
    2. Neugut AI
    . Associations between perceived cancer risk and established risk factors in a national community sample. Cancer Detect Prev 2004;28:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bittner-Fagan H,
    2. Diamond J,
    3. Myers R,
    4. Gill JM
    . Perception, intention, and action in adolescent obesity. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:555–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    National Cancer Institute. Fact sheet 3.7 obesity and cancer. Available at: www.cancer.org/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/obesity. Updated 2004. Accessed December 7, 2011.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kim SE,
    2. Perez-Stable EJ,
    3. Wong S,
    4. Gregorich S,
    5. Sawaya GF,
    6. Walsh JME,
    7. Kaplan CP
    . Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:728–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal (colon) cancer incidence rates. Available at: www.cdc.gov/Features/dsColorectalCancer/. Updated April 4, 2011. Accessed June 18, 2012.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Caan BJ,
    2. Coates AO,
    3. Slattery ML,
    4. Potter JD,
    5. Quesenberry CP Jr.,
    6. Edwards SM
    . Body size and the risk of colon cancer in a large case–control study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:178–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Giacosa A,
    2. Franceschi S,
    3. La Vecchia C,
    4. Favero A,
    5. Andreatta R
    . Energy intake, overweight, physical exercise and colorectal cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev 1999;8(suppl 1):S53–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Murphy TK,
    2. Calle EE,
    3. Rodriguez C,
    4. Kahn HS,
    5. Thun MJ
    . Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:847–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 6
November-December 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Weight Status and Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Weight Status and Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk
Heather Bittner Fagan, Randa Sifri, Richard Wender, Elena Schumacher, James F. Reed
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2012, 25 (6) 792-797; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.120017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Weight Status and Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk
Heather Bittner Fagan, Randa Sifri, Richard Wender, Elena Schumacher, James F. Reed
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2012, 25 (6) 792-797; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.120017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prostate Cancer Decision-Making, Health Services, and the Family Physician Workforce
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cancer Risk
  • Colon/Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Obesity
  • Weight Status

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire