Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Does Patient Assessment of the Quality of the Primary Care They Receive Predict Subsequent Outcomes?: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study

James W. Mold, Frank Lawler, Kyle J. Schauf and Cheryl B. Aspy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2012, 25 (4) e1-e12; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.120106
James W. Mold
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Lawler
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle J. Schauf
MS4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl B. Aspy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Population and Comparison of Those Still Alive with Those Who Died
    CharacteristicsAllAliveDeadP
    Age category (years)782
        65–74453341 (75%)112 (25%)
        75–84282161 (57%)121 (43%)
        85+4712 (26%)35 (74%)0.0001
    Sex
        Male338210 (62%)1,286 (37%)
        Female444304 (68%)140 (32%)0.07
    Race
        White668445 (67%)223 (33%)
        Nonwhite11473 (64%)41 (36%)0.59
    Marital status
        Married272151 (56%)121 (44%)
        Other504364 (72%)140 (28%)0.0001
    Income
        <$15,000/year14181 (57%)60 (43%)
        $15,000–$35,000/year342218 (64%)124 (36%)
        >$35,000/year276202 (73%)74 (27%)0.0028
    Education
        Less than high school12376 (62%)47 (38%)
        High school194137 (71%)57 (29%)
        More than high school465305 (66%)160 (34%)0.24
    Confidant
        Present10564 (61%)41 (39%)
        Absent674452 (67%)2,221 (33%)0.22
    ADL score
        0–13264148 (56%)116 (44%)
        14518370 (71%)148 (29%)0.0001
    IADL score
        0–13233115 (49%)118 (51%)
        14549403 (73%)146 (27%)0.0001
    Health (self-rated)
        Poor122 (17%)10 (83%)
        Fair11762 (53%)55 (47%)
        Good304184 (61%)120 (40%)
        Very good265203 (77%)62 (23%)
        Excellent8467 (80%)17 (20%)0.0001
    Continuous VariablesNMean (SD)Mean (SD)P Value
        Age78272.4 (5.3)76.7 (6.6)0.0001
        BMI76929.0 (5.3)28.1 (5.9)0.035
    AliveDead
    NMean (SD)Mean (SD)P Value
    SF-36 General Health77568.2 (17.5)58.0 (19.6)<0.0001
    Health (0 to 100)73379.1 (15.5)70.4 (18.1)<0.0001
    QWB-SA (0–1)7750.65 (0.12)0.60 (0.13)<0.0001
    CPCI
        Comprehensive (0–6)7785.0 (0.6)5.0 (0.7)0.63
        Accumulated knowledge (0–6)7804.8 (0.8)4.7 (0.9)0.45
        Communication (0–6)7724.8 (0.8)4.7 (0.8)0.045
        Preference for regular doctor (0–6)7825.0 (0.7)5.1 (0.7)0.34
        Coordination (0–6)7804.3 (0.9)4.4 (0.9)0.09
        Advocacy (0–6)7805.0 (0.6)5.1 (0.6)0.16
        Family (0–6)7254.2 (1.4)4.1 (1.4)0.14
        Community (0–6)7744.4 (1.3)4.4 (1.4)0.78
        UPC (0–1)7790.62 (0.3)0.57 (0.3)0.016
    Total CPCI (0–49)75738.3 (5.3)38.1 (5.4)0.73
    Years with PCP mean (SD)77510.5 (8.7)10.5 (9.0)0.54
    • ADL, activities of daily living; IADL, independent activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; QWB-SA, Quality of Well-Being Self-administered Scale; UPC, proportion of care from PCP; CPCI, Components of Primary Care Index (scale 0–5 for subscales, 0–40 for total); PCP, primary care physician; Years with PCP, duration of current primary care PCP–participant relationship in years.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of ‘Severity of Illness’ Subgroups, ADL + IADL <27 (0–28); ADL + IADL >26 and >4 PCP Visits/Year, and ADL + IADL >26 and <5 PCP Visits per Year
    >Categorical VariablesDisabledNondisabled
    High UsersLow UsersP
    185197400
    Age (years)
        65–7411 (27%)11 (27%)19 (46%)
        75–8487 (18%)121 (26%)264 (56%)
        85+87 (32%)65 (24%)117 (44%)0.0006
    Sex
        Female57 (17%)84 (25%)197 (58%)
        Male128 (29%)113 (25%)203 (57%)0.002
    Race
        White153 (23%)168 (25%)347 (52%)
        Nonwhite32 (28%)29 (29%)53 (53%)0.43
    Marital status
        Married74 (27%)70 (26%)128 (47%)
        Other107 (21%)125 (25%)272 (54%)0.11
    Income
        <$15,00050 (35%)34 (24%)57 (40%)
        $15,000–$35,000/year81 (24%)90 (26%)171 (50%)
        >$35,000/year49 (18%)67 (24%)160 (58%)0.0010
    Education
        Less than high school43 (35%)25 (20%)55 (45%)
        High school43 (22%)61 (31%)90 (46%)
        More than high school99 (21%)111 (24%)255 (55%)0.0038
    Confidant
        Present33 (31%)26 (25%)46 (44%)
        Absent150 (22%)170 (25%)354 (53%)0.10
    Health
        Poor10 (83%)0 (0%)2 (17%)
        Fair62 (53%)29 (25%)26 (22%)
        Good80 (26%)83 (27%)141 (46%)
        Very good21 (8%)67 (25%)177 (67%)
        Excellent12 (14%)18 (21%)54 (64%)0.0001
    Morbidity Index1.79 (1.18)1.46 (1.08)1.07 (0.92)
    Continuous variables
        BMI30.84 (6.55)28.96 (5.32)28.02 (4.98)0.0002
    Rating (0–100)65.09 (17.59)76.02 (14.93)81.17 (15.07)<0.0001
    QWB-SA (0–1)0.53 (0.12)0.64 (0.11)0.67 (0.11)<0.0001
    MOS SF-36
        General Health (0–100)50.38 (18.36)64.30 (15.83)71.57 (16.50)<0.0001
        Emotional Health (0–100)75.32 (17.56)78.30 (15.92)82.30 (14.55)<0.0001
    Years with current PCP10.0 (9.1)11.4 (8.8)10.1 (8.6)0.81
        Median7108
    PCP visits*5.7 (4.3)8.4 (5.3)2.6 (1.1)<0.0001
        Median563
    Other visits to practice*0.80 (1.53)0.90 (1.7)0.47 (1.11)0.0002
        Median000
    Other healthcare visits*5.5 (7.8)4.2 (4.9)2.8 (4.2)<0.001
        Median432
    ED visit rate*0.59 (1.71)0.21 (0.46)0.11 (0.36)<0.001
        Median0.1200
    Hospitalization rate (SD)0.45 (0.94)0.21 (0.46)0.11 (0.33)<0.0001
        Median0.0600
    Deaths (N; %)100 (54.1)63 (32.0)101 (25.3)<0.0001
    Survival time7.4 (3.4)8.7 (2.9)9.1 (2.6)<0.0001
    Comprehensiveness5.02 (0.69)5.19 (0.61)4.97 (0.63)0.1112
    Accumulated knowledge4.80 (0.93)5.00 (0.77)4.58 (0.86)0.0002
    Communication4.65 (0.90)4.86 (0.78)4.76 (0.77)0.28
    Preference for regular doctor5.12 (0.69)5.23 (0.63)5.00 (0.65)0.0006
    Coordination4.48 (0.86)4.59 (0.82)4.19 (0.91)<0.0001
    Advocacy5.10 (0.67)5.22 (0.60)4.98 (0.59)0.0031
    Considers family context4.27 (1.39)4.35 (1.38)4.01 (1.37)0.0141
    Community4.52 (1.30)4.47 (1.32)4.34 (1.28)0.3545
    UPC0.55 (0.27)0.67 (0.21)0.59 (0.29)0.002
    Total CPCI38.5 (5.7)39.6 (5.1)37.4 (5.2)0.0018
    • ADL, activities of daily living; IADL, independent activities of daily living; PCP, primary care physician; BMI, body mass index; QWB-SA, Quality of Well-Being Self-administered Scale; MOS, Medical Outcomes Study; ED, emergency department; UPC, proportion of care from PCP; CPCI, Components of Primary Care Index (scale 0–5 for subscales, 0–40 for total).

    • View popup
    Table 3. Longitudinal Growth Curve Model for HRQoL (QWB-SA) within Severity of Illness Subgroups (CPCI Scores Were Not Transformed)
    Independent VariablesParameter Estimate (SE)F StatisticP
    Disabled
        Age−0.002 (0.001)2.590.11
        Sex (female)0.02 (0.02)0.680.41
        Marital status (married)−0.001 (0.02)0.000.96)
        Education (compared with more than high school)0.380.69
            Less than high school−0.01 (0.02)
            High school0.01 (0.02)
        Income (compared with >$35,000)0.900.41
             <$15,000−0.03 (0.03)
            $15,000–$35,000−0.0003 (0.02)
        Body mass index0.001 (0.001)0.440.51
        General Health (SF-36)0.002 (0.0005)25.81<0.0001
        Morbidity Index−0.02 (0.01)4.290.04
        Visits with other providers−0.003 (0.005)0.410.52
        Years with current PCP−0.0001 (0.001)0.010.91
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive(0–6)0.001 (0.01)0.010.93
            Accumulated knowledge(0–6)0.003 (0.01)0.080.78
            Communication(0–6)0.004 (0.01)0.220.64
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.660.42
            Coordination (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.470.49
            Advocacy (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.250.62
            Family (0–6)3.32 e−6(0.01)0.000.90
            Community (0–6)0.01 (0.01)0.900.34
            UPC (0–1)0.05 (0.03)2.840.09
        Total CPCI (0–49)0.0004 (0.002)0.060.81
    Nondisabled, high users
        Age−0.003 (0.001)3.830.05
        Sex (female)−0.008 (0.02)0.290.59
        Marital status (married)0.009 (0.02)0.230.63
        Education (compared with more than high school)
            Less than high school0.029 (0.02)
            High school0.007 (0.02)
        Income (compared with >$35,000)0.350.71
             <$15,000−0.02 (0.03)
            $15,000–$35,000−0.01 (0.02)
        Body mass index−0.003 (0.001)3.850.05
        General Health (SF-36)0.003 (0.0005)26.31<0.0001
        Morbidity Index−0.01 (0.01)2.580.11
        Visits with other providers−0.01 (0.004)2.820.09
        Years with current PCP0.0004 (0.0009)0.160.69
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive (0 to 6)−0.01 (0.01)0.220.64
            Accumulated knowledge (0 to 6)−0.002 (0.01)0.040.85
            Communication (0–6)−0.002 (0.01)0.050.83
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.420.52
            Coordination (0–6)0.002 (0.01)0.030.86
            Advocacy (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.990.32
            Family (0–6)0.01 (0.01)4.300.04
            Community (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)1.570.21
            UPC (0–1)0.01 (0.04)0.050.83
        Total CPCI (0–49)−0.0005 (0.002)0.090.77
    Nondisabled, low users
        Age−0.003 (0.0009)10.430.001
        Sex (female)0.02 (0.01)2.650.10
        Marital status(married)0.02 (0.01)2.310.13
        Education (compared with more than high school)1.450.24
            Less than high school0.020 (0.02)
            High school0.02 (0.01)
        Income (compared with >$35,000)0.280.76
             <$15,000−0.01 (0.02)
            $15,000–$35,000−0.01 (0.01)
        Body mass index−0.002 (0.001)2.740.10
        General Health (SF-36)0.002 (0.0003)39.06<0.0001
        Morbidity Index−0.01 (0.005)6.910.009
        Visits with other providers0.002 (0.003)0.680.41
        Years with current PCP0.001 (0.001)2.090.15
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive (0–6)−0.01 (0.01)0.940.33
            Accumulated knowledge (0–6)−0.003 (0.01)0.290.59
            Communication (0–6)0.01 (0.01)1.520.22
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)−0.001 (0.01)0.010.94
            Coordination (0–6)0.01 (0,01)4.040.05
            Advocacy (0–6)−0.002 (0.01)0.040.84
            Family (0–6)0.003 (0.004)0.670.41
            Community (0–6)−0.002 (0.004)0.230.63
            UPC (0–1)0.04 (0.02)5.190.02
        Total CPCI (0–49)0.0005 (0.001)0.250.62
    • ↵* CPCI total and subscale scores were entered separately (10 separate models are represented).

    • HRQoL, health-related quality of life; QWB-SA, Quality of Well-Being Self-administered Scale; CPCI, Components of Primary Care Index (scale 0–5 for subscales, 0–40 for total); PCP, primary care physician; UPC, proportion of care from PCP.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Cox Proportional Hazards Models for Each Severity of Illness Subgroup
    Independent VariablesHazard Ratio (95% CI)χ2 StatisticP
    Disabled
        Age1.07 (1.03–1.11)12.40.0004
        Sex (female)0.54 (0.31–0.95)4.530.033
        Marital status (married)0.69 (0.40–1.18)1.830.18
        Education0.92 (0.68–1.23)0.330.56
        Income1.08 (0.76–1.54)0.170.68
        Body mass index0.98 (0.94–1.01)1.560.21
        General Health (SF-36)0.99 (0.98–1.00)2.760.10
        Morbidity Index1.02 (0.84–1.23)0.0430.84
        Visits with other providers0.84 (0.69–1.02)3.090.079
        Years with current PCP1.00 (0.97–1.02)0.0620.80
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive (0–6)1.11 (0.77–1.60)0.320.57
            Accumulated knowledge (0–6)1.03 (0.78–1.37)0.0460.83
            Communication (0–6)1.02 (0.79–1.31)0.0230.88
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)1.01 (0.72–1.40)0.00110.97
            Coordination (0–6)1.20 (0.86–1.66)1.160.28
            Advocacy (0–6)1.24 (0.82–1.87)1.050.30
            Family (0–6)1.07 (0.89–1.29)0.570.45
            Community (0–6)1.08 (0.90–1.30)0.740.39
            UPC (0–1)1.94 (0.83–4.54)2.330.13
    Total CPCI (0–49)1.02 (0.98–1.08)0.930.33
    Nondisabled, high users
        Age1.10 (1.05–1.16)14.10.0002
        Sex (female)0.26 (0.13–0.51)15.00.0001
        Marital status (married)0.34 (0.17–0.66)10.00.0016
        Education1.21 (0.78–1.87)0.740.39
        Income1.02 (0.62–1.68)0.00690.93
        Body mass index0.98 (0.92–1.04)0.580.45
        General Health (SF-36)0.98 (0.96–1.00)4.170.041
        Morbidity Index1.50 (1.16–1.93)9.430.0021
        Visits with other providers1.08 (0.98–1.25)0.950.33
        Years with current PCP1.01 (0.98–1.05)0.790.37
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive (0–6)1.07 (0.67–1.69)0.0750.78
            Accumulated knowledge (0–6)1.18 (0.76–1.83)0.530.47
            Communication (0–6)1.01 (0.68–1.50)0.0010.98
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)1.29 (0.82–2.05)1.200.27
            Coordination (0–6)1.43 (0.99–2.07)3.580.058
            Advocacy (0–6)1.86 (1.09–3.17)5.110.024
            Family (0–6)0.93 (0.73–1.17)0.430.51
            Community (0–6)1.05 (0.82–1.33)0.130.71
            UPC (0–1)0.69 (0.19–2.59)0.300.58
    Total CPCI (0–49)0.48 (0.13–1.80)1.180.28
    Nondisabled, low users
        Age1.07 (1.03–1.10)13.00.0003
        Sex (female)0.55 (0.33–0.90)5.560.018
        Marital status (married)0.54 (0.31–0.92)5.040.025
        Education1.47 (1.06–2.04)5.280.022
        Income0.75 (0.53–1.05)2.810.094
        Body mass index1.00 (0.96–1.05)0.0130.91
        General Health (SF-36)0.98 (0.97–1.00)6.250.013
        Morbidity Index1.22 (0.98–1.50)3.260.071
        Visits with other providers0.86 (0.70–1.05)2.130.14
        Years with current PCP0.99 (0.97–1.02)0.240.63
        CPCI*
            Comprehensive (0–6)0.86 (0.61–1.23)0.670.41
            Accumulated knowledge (0–6)0.81 (0.62–1.05)2.640.10
            Communication (0–6)0.79 (0.61–1.02)3.270.071
            Preference for regular doctor (0–6)1.13 (0.84–1.54)0.640.42
            Coordination (0–6)0.91 (0.72–1.14)0.720.40
            Advocacy (0–6)0.95 (0.66–1.35)0.0990.75
            Family (0–6)0.92 (0.77–1.09)1.000.32
            Community (0–6)0.90 (0.76–1.06)1.680.20
            UPC (0–1)0.51 (0.23–1.13)2.760.096
    Total CPCI (0–49)0.97 (0.93–1.02)1.530.22
    • ↵* CPCI total and subscale scores were entered separately (10 separate models are represented).

    • PCP, primary care physician; CPCI, Components of Primary Care Index (scale 0–5 for subscales, 0–40 for total); UPC, proportion of care from PCP.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 4
July-August 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Patient Assessment of the Quality of the Primary Care They Receive Predict Subsequent Outcomes?: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Does Patient Assessment of the Quality of the Primary Care They Receive Predict Subsequent Outcomes?: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
James W. Mold, Frank Lawler, Kyle J. Schauf, Cheryl B. Aspy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) e1-e12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.120106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Does Patient Assessment of the Quality of the Primary Care They Receive Predict Subsequent Outcomes?: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
James W. Mold, Frank Lawler, Kyle J. Schauf, Cheryl B. Aspy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) e1-e12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.120106
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire