Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleFamily Medicine World Perspective

A Culture of Care: The French Approach to Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management

Colleen O'Brien Cherry, Olivier Steichen, Anjali Mathew, Didier Duhot, Gilles Hebbrecht and Richard J. Schuster
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2012, 25 (4) 477-486; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110296
Colleen O'Brien Cherry
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Steichen
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anjali Mathew
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Didier Duhot
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilles Hebbrecht
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Schuster
MD, MMM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Key subthemes in the doctor–patient relationship.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Best practices comprising a “culture of care” for French cardiovascular risk factor management. EMR = electronic medical records.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Codebook for French Primary Care Physician Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Best Practices for Managing Cardiovascular Disease
    I believe I am successful managing patients with CVD risk factors because:
        1Guidelines or recommendationsTreatment in accordance with established guidelines and recommendations
        2PreventionStresses preventive rather than only curative practices
        3MonitoringRegular measurement and biomonitoring, computerized med records
        4Motivation of doctorPersistence and commitment
        5Motivation of patientFollow recommendations; be active participant in care; attend appointments and follow-up
        6Doctor knowledgeExpertise and training
        7Patient diet/lifestylePatient knowledge of importance of diet/lifestyle changes
        8Patient health coverageAccess to paid drugs and care
        9Group careDoctor works with other doctors; nurse involvement
    Doctor–patient relationship
        Sub code
            10TrustPatient trusts doctor, doctor trusts patient, bilateral respect, shared responsibility
            20CommunicationNonverbal, verbal, listening
            30UnderstandingPatient understands doctor and doctor understands patient
            40EducationDoctor gets patient to understand suggestions, treatment, and biology of diagnosis and disease
            50SocialDoctor is aware of patients' family, financial, work, life goals, and cultural context
            60TimeLength of time in relationship between doctor and patient, time spent with patient
    Health care in my country is generally good or not good because:
        1GoodOverall good or satisfactory
        2PoorUnsatisfactory or poor
        3Good and badBoth positive and negative aspects
        4Good—health care equityEquality of access and care; everyone treated equally
        5Good—comprehensive careFull financial coverage and support
        6Good—qualityQuality patient care of service and facilities
        7Good—preventionEmphasis on preventative care practices
        8Good—freedomDoctors are free to prescribe; they are not influenced by any lobby
        9Bad—patient irresponsibilityThe system encourages patient to excessive drug consumption; system abuses, assisted patients
        10Bad—doctor new type of remunerationDoctors see more patients during the day to increase their revenues: less time per patient, less quality
        11Bad—no recognition of family doctorBad organization of primary care
        12Bad—wastingWastes time that could be spent caring for patients
        13Bad—health care reformStates uses financial approach to deal with health care spending, privatization of health care
        14Bad—bureaucracyBureaucracy and administration hinders care
        15Bad—insufficient healthcare equityInequality of access and care; everyone treated equally
        16Bad—increase of out of pocket expensesPatient pays more and more for health care
        17Bad—lack of qualityLack of quality patient care of service and facilities
        18Bad—lobbyingBig pharmaceutical companies, politics, and universities
        19Bad—lack of timeLimits time of visit and education time
        20Poor preventionNot enough emphasis on preventive care practices
        21Bad—remunerationDoctors are not paid enough
        22Bad—underinvestment by stateState does not invest enough in healthcare
        23Bad—lack of professionalsDecrease of medical demography, bad geographical distribution of care providers
        24Bad—expensiveHealth care is too expensive
    Cardiovascular death rates are 20% to 25% lower in France, Japan, and Israel versus the United States because of:
        1HealthcareBetter access to quality health care
        2PreventionPreventive measures to reduce CVD risks
        3Food/dietBetter quality or more nutritious food and diet/smaller portions
        4ObesityFewer obesity issues in France/more in United States
        5WineRegular consumption of wine
        6ExerciseRegular exercise/less stationary
        7LifestyleStress and intensity of living
        8GeneticsCultural and/or genetic factors
        9EducationGreater patient education or awareness
        10EquityFairness of the health system, more equitable coverage, or both
        11DisparitiesDisparities in care by ethnicity and socioeconomic divisions
    • CVD, cardiovascular disease.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Physicians' Beliefs about Why Cardiovascular Disease Death Rates Are Higher in the United States
    CodeResponses, n (%)
    1Food/diet348 (53)
    2Equity144 (22)
    3Exercise128 (19)
    4Lifestyle77 (12)
    5Obesity76 (12)
    6Quality of care71 (11)
    7Genetics21 (3)
    8Prevention19 (3)
    9Wine11 (2)
    10Education6 (1)
    11Disparities6 (1)
    • Numbers refer to the frequency of responses that include a theme. Some respondents mentioned multiple themes so the response percentages will be greater than 100%.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Physicians Beliefs about Why They Are Successful at Managing Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
    CodeResponses, n (%)
    1Doctor–patient relationship331 (51)
    2Doctor knowledge106 (16)
    3Motivation of the doctor90 (14)
    4Guidelines or recommendations89 (14)
    5Patient health coverage66 (10)
    6Motivation of patient58 (9)
    7Prevention41 (6)
    8Monitoring21 (3)
    9Lifestyle21 (3)
    10Group care9 (1)
    • Numbers refer to the frequency of responses that include a theme. Some respondents mentioned multiple themes so the response percentages will be greater than 100%.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 4
July-August 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Culture of Care: The French Approach to Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Culture of Care: The French Approach to Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management
Colleen O'Brien Cherry, Olivier Steichen, Anjali Mathew, Didier Duhot, Gilles Hebbrecht, Richard J. Schuster
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) 477-486; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110296

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Culture of Care: The French Approach to Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management
Colleen O'Brien Cherry, Olivier Steichen, Anjali Mathew, Didier Duhot, Gilles Hebbrecht, Richard J. Schuster
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) 477-486; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110296
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cardiovascular Diseases and Other Evidence for Primary Care Clinical Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-Perceived Mental Health and Perceived Discrimination in Family Physicians and Residents: A Comparative Study Between Men and Women
  • Strategies for Increasing the Role of Family Medicine in Mexican Health Care Reform
  • Family Medicine in Ethiopia: Lessons from a Global Collaboration
Show more Family Medicine World Perspective

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire