A Method for Obtaining an Unbiased Sample of Family Medicine Patients for Research Purposes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Aday LA

   1. Aday LA

   . Deciding who will be in the sample. In: Aday LA editor. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996:112–42.
2. 2.↵
   1. Cumming RG

   . Is probability sampling always better? A comparison of results from a quota and a probability sample survey. Community Health Stud 1990;14:132–7.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Mainous AG III.,
   2. Hougland JG Jr.

   . Survey sampling issues in primary care research. Fam Med 1991;23:539–43.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Graubard BI,
   2. Korn EL

   . Modelling the sampling design in the analysis of health surveys. Stat Methods Med Res 1996;5:263–81.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Pfeffermann D

   . The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1996;5:239–61.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Rothemich SF,
   2. Woolf SH,
   3. Johnson RE,
   4. Marsland DW

   . Evaluating the administration of an office-based health survey in a primary care practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1002–12.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Woolf SH,
   2. Rothemich SF,
   3. Johnson RE,
   4. Marsland DW

   . Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:1111–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Roach KE

   . A clinician's guide to specification and sampling. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001;31:753–8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Lee ML,
   2. Yano EM,
   3. Wang M,
   4. Simon BF,
   5. Rubenstein LV

   . What patient population does visit-based sampling in primary care settings represent? Med Care 2002;40:761–70.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Smith BH,
    2. Hannaford PC,
    3. Elliott AM,
    4. et al

    . The ‘number needed to sample' in primary care research: comparison of two primary care sampling frames for chronic back pain. Fam Pract 2005;22:205–14.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Feild L,
    2. Pruchno RA,
    3. Bewley J,
    4. et al

    . Using probability vs nonprobability sampling to identify hard-to-access participants for health-related research: costs and contrasts. J Aging Health 2006;18:565–83.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Slora EJ,
    2. Thoma KA,
    3. Wasserman RC,
    4. Pedlow SE,
    5. Bocian AB

    . Patient visits to a national practice-based research network: comparing pediatric research in office settings with the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Pediatrics 2006;118:e228–34.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Binns HJ,
    2. Lanier D,
    3. Pace WD,
    4. et al

    . Describing primary care encounters: the Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:39–47.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Levy PS,
    2. Lemeshow S

    . Sampling for Health Professionals. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications; 1980.
15. 15.↵
    1. Logue E,
    2. Bourguet C,
    3. Scott ED,
    4. et al

    . Sleep adequacy and obesity in primary care. Obesity 2010;18:(Suppl 2):S145.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Agresti A,
    2. Coull B

    . Approximate is better than “Exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 1998;52:119–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Snedecor GW,
    2. Cochran WG

    1. Snedecor GW,
    2. Cochran WG

    . Sampling from the Binomial Distribution. In: Snedecor GW, Cochran WG editors. Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1974:199–227.