Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Re: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or Clindamycin for Community-Associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) Skin Infections

Thana Khawcharoenporn
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2011, 24 (3) 331; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.03.100305
Thana Khawcharoenporn
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor:I read the article by Frei et al1 with great interest and would like to emphasize the important role of incision and drainage (I&D) for management of skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). As a general rule in infectious diseases, any antibiotics, no matter how strong and broad-spectrum they are, will not work effectively unless the infected source is properly drained.

Since the emergence of CA-MRSA as the important cause of infections in both outpatient and inpatient settings, there is growing evidence that supports the use of non–β-lactam antibiotics, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, and tetracyclines for treatment of CA-MRSA SSTIs.2–5 Among patients with drainable abscesses caused by CA-MRSA, treatment options can be either I&D or a combination of I&D and antibiotics. However, there have been no clinical studies to compare the efficacy between these treatment options.2–5 The conclusion by Frei et al1 that combination of I&D and antibiotics is more effective than I&D alone may not be totally accurate because of the following reasons. First, it is premature to draw this conclusion from this study given its limitations, including its retrospective nature, the small sample size, and that the subgroup analysis of patients undergoing I&D was not predefined. Secondly, characteristics between the groups receiving combination of I&D and antibiotics and I&D alone were not compared to prove similarities. Third, disease severity, which is one of the most important confounders, was not adjusted. Patients with mild infection could be treated with I&D alone without the need for antibiotics, whereas the role of antibiotics would be obvious in more severe cases. Unfortunately, there are no common criteria or scale of severity for SSTIs. Thus, it is difficult to compare results between studies based on patient severity. Some of the characteristics that can affect outcomes and should be included in the criteria or severity scale are the size of the lesion, the number of lesions, and presence of concurrent ulcer or abscess, fever, and sepsis.2 Lastly, a study previously published by myself and my colleague demonstrated a high treatment success rate (85%) using cephalexin among patients with skin abscesses who were undergoing I&D despite that 70% of the cultures grew CA-MRSA, which were resistant to cephalexin.2 This finding is consistent with the findings from the study by Rajendran et al,6 which with the authors contrasted their data.

Given the potential adverse reactions and resistance created by the overuse of antibiotics, I encourage proper selection of patient populations that would benefit from antibiotic treatment of CA-MRSA SSTIs. A standardized disease severity scale for SSTIs and prospective randomized studies are needed to assess and compare the efficacy between I&D alone and in combination with antibiotics for patients with CA-MRSA SSTIs.

Notes

  • The above letter was referred to the author of the article in question, who offers the following reply.

References

  1. ↵
    Frei CR, Miller ML, Lewis JS II, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or clindamycin for community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) skin infections. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 714–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Khawcharoenporn T, Tice A. Empiric outpatient therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalexin, or clindamycin for cellulitis. Am J Med 2010; 123: 942–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. Ruhe JJ, Smith N, Bradsher RW, Menon A. Community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infections: impact of antimicrobial therapy on outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 777–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Ruhe JJ, Menon A. Tetracyclines as an oral treatment option for patients with community onset skin and soft tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 3298–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Szumowski JD, Cohen DE, Kanaya F, Mayer KH. Treatment and outcomes of infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at an ambulatory clinic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 423–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Rajendran PM, Young D, Maurer T, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cephalexin for treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses in a population at risk for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 4044–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 24 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 24, Issue 3
May-June 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or Clindamycin for Community-Associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) Skin Infections
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Re: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or Clindamycin for Community-Associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) Skin Infections
Thana Khawcharoenporn
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2011, 24 (3) 331; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.03.100305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Re: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or Clindamycin for Community-Associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) Skin Infections
Thana Khawcharoenporn
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2011, 24 (3) 331; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.03.100305
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire