Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Unmet Dental Needs in Rural Primary Care: A Clinic-, Community-, and Practice-based Research Network Collaborative

Melinda M. Davis, Thomas J. Hilton, Sean Benson, Jon Schott, Alan Howard, Paul McGinnis and Lyle Fagnan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2010, 23 (4) 514-522; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090080
Melinda M. Davis
PhD, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Hilton
MS, DMD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Benson
DDS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Schott
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Howard
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul McGinnis
MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyle Fagnan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics of Eligible Patients and Patients Who Received the Oral Health Screening, Dental Access Survey, or both Screening and Survey during the 6-Week Study Period*

    CharacteristicEligible Patients† (n [%])Patients Completing Survey‡ (n [%])Patients Who Received Oral Screening§ (n [%])Patients Who Completed the Survey and Who Received an Oral Screening‖ (n [%])
    Total patients1655 (100)1108 (66.9)674 (40.7)591 (35.7)
    Sex
        Male597 (36.1)394 (35.6)227 (33.7)202 (34.2)
        Female1058 (63.9)714 (64.4)447 (66.3)389 (65.8)
    Age (years)
        1–4117 (7.1)59 (5.3)42 (6.2)33 (5.6)
        5–14142 (8.6)90 (8.1)56 (8.3)52 (8.8)
        15–44503 (30.4)333 (30.1)213 (31.6)187 (31.6)
        45–64485 (29.3)328 (29.6)189 (28.0)166 (28.1)
        ≥65408 (24.7)298 (26.9)174 (25.8)153 (25.9)
    • * Because of rounding, some percentage grouping totals do not equal 100%.

    • † Unique patients older than 12 months of age out of the 2316 total patient visits during the 6-week study period.

    • ‡ χ2 goodness-of-fit P = .730 for sex; P = .093 for age.

    • § χ2 goodness-of-fit P = .209 for sex; P = .741 for age.

    • ‖ χ2 goodness-of-fit P = .356 for sex; P = .642 for age.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Outcomes of Oral Health Clinical Screening by Age Category (n = 674)

    Outcomes (ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Codes)All Patients (n [%])Age (Years)
    1–4 (n [%])5–14 (n [%])15–44 (n [%])45–64 (n [%])≥65 (n [%])P
    Patients who received screening*674 (100.0)42 (6.2)56 (8.3)213 (31.6)189 (28.0)174 (25.8)
        No condition(s) detected (V70.7)364 (54.0)36 (9.9)45 (12.4)153 (42.0)90 (24.7)40 (11.0)<.001
        Oral health condition(s) detected310 (46.0)6 (1.9)11 (3.6)60 (19.4)99 (31.9)134 (43.2)
    Distribution of detected oral health condition(s)†
        Partial edentulism (525.50)165 (24.5)1 (2.4)1 (1.8)26 (12.2)68 (36.0)69 (39.7)<.001
        Caries (521.00)87 (12.9)3 (7.1)9 (16.1)40 (18.8)23 (12.2)12 (6.9).007
        Complete edentulism (525.40)67 (9.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (0.9)13 (6.9)52 (29.9)<.001
        Broken/cracked teeth (521.81)60 (8.9)0 (0.0)1 (1.8)20 (9.4)22 (11.6)17 (9.8).048
        Unspecified disorder (525.9)10 (1.5)2 (4.8)1 (1.8)2 (0.9)1 (0.5)4 (2.3).238
        Abscess (522.5)5 (0.7)1 (2.4)0 (0.0)1 (0.5)1 (0.5)2 (1.1).614
    • * Percentages in the first 3 rows are based on the number of patients in the age category divided by the number in the “All Patients” column.

    • † For the subcategories of detected oral health condition(s), percentages are based on the number of patients who received the screening within each age category (ie, caries in the 1–4 years old category: 3/42 = 7.1%). Note that some patients had more than one condition detected.

    • ICD-9-CM, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 9—Clinical Modification.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Results from the Patient Survey (n = 1108)

    Variablesn (%)
    Insurance
        Health (yes)1006 (91.2)
        Dental (yes)571 (51.9)
        Health and dental (yes)567 (56.5)
    Source of regular dental care (yes)717 (66.0)
        Tried to see dentist during the past year654 (59.5)
        Had a dental visit during the past year596 (53.8)
    Self-rated oral health
        Poor128 (11.7)
        Average345 (31.5)
        Good428 (39.1)
        Excellent194 (17.7)
    Self-rated overall health
        Poor80 (7.4)
        Average323 (29.7)
        Good530 (48.7)
        Excellent155 (14.2)
    Unmet dental need (yes)304 (28.0)
    Stated unmet dental needs by condition*
        Cavities/fillings/crowns124 (11.2)
        Dentures71 (6.4)
        Exam/cleaning54 (4.9)
        Extractions44 (4.0)
        Broken/cracked teeth28 (2.5)
        Lack of money/needs insurance37 (3.3)
        Other coded conditions†52 (4.7)
        Other miscellaneous‡34 (3.1)
    • * Total stated unmet dental need categories do not add to 304 unique patients because survey respondents could self-report multiple unmet needs.

    • † Other coded conditions included periodontics (n = 15, 1.4%); endodontics (n = 11, 1.0%); orthodontics (n = 11, 1.0%); bridges (n = 11, 1.0%); and general statements such as “a lot” (n = 5, 0.5%). One patient reported multiple other coded unmet needs, thus individual values do not equal the table total (n = 52, 4.7%).

    • ‡ Other miscellaneous included dental needs stated by patients that were not captured in the 11 coded categories. Most patients in this category also specified one of the coded unmet needs.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Association of Insurance Status with Perceived Dental Needs and Health Outcomes (n = 1097)*

    Dental/Health OutcomeDental Insurance† Relative to No Insurance§Health Insurance Only‡ Relative to No Insurance§
    OR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
    Had source of regular dental care6.4 (4.0–10.3)‖<.0011.9 (1.2–3.0).008
        Tried to see dentist during the past year3.8 (2.4–6.0)‖<.0011.9 (1.2–3.0).006
        Had dental visit during the past year2.9 (1.0–8.2).0542.9 (1.0–0.9).061
    Oral health rated good/excellent2.8 (1.8–4.5)‖<.0011.7 (1.1–2.7).024
    Overall health rated good/excellent1.9 (1.2–3.0)‖<.0011.1 (0.7–1.7).82
    No stated unmet dental need(s)3.1 (2.0–4.9)‖<.0012.0 (1.3–3.1).004
    • * Odds ratio (OR) estimates were limited to patients with information about both dental and health insurance status.

    • † 99.5% of patients (n = 567 of 570) with dental insurance also carried health insurance.

    • ‡ 43.3% of patients (n = 433 of 1000) with health insurance did not carry dental insurance.

    • § 8.5% of patients (n = 94) carried no insurance.

    • ‖ Differences between dental insurance and health insurance significant at P ≤ .002.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 4
July-August 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unmet Dental Needs in Rural Primary Care: A Clinic-, Community-, and Practice-based Research Network Collaborative
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Unmet Dental Needs in Rural Primary Care: A Clinic-, Community-, and Practice-based Research Network Collaborative
Melinda M. Davis, Thomas J. Hilton, Sean Benson, Jon Schott, Alan Howard, Paul McGinnis, Lyle Fagnan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2010, 23 (4) 514-522; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Unmet Dental Needs in Rural Primary Care: A Clinic-, Community-, and Practice-based Research Network Collaborative
Melinda M. Davis, Thomas J. Hilton, Sean Benson, Jon Schott, Alan Howard, Paul McGinnis, Lyle Fagnan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2010, 23 (4) 514-522; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090080
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Integrating Oral Health Screening Into Primary Care to Promote Dental Referrals in Maryland
  • Primary Care Physician Roles in Health Centers with Oral Health Care Units
  • An Assessment Model for Evaluating Outcomes in Federally Qualified Health Centers' Dental Departments: Results of a 5 Year Study
  • An Assessment Model for Evaluating Outcomes in Federally Qualified Health Centers' Dental Departments: Results of a 5 Year Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire