Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherAbout Practice-Based Research Networks

Practice Benefit from Participating in a Practice-based Research Network Study of Postpartum Depression: A National Research Network (NRN) Report

Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Allen Dietrich, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham, Jessica Huff, Liliana Rocca and Peter Wollan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2010, 23 (4) 455-464; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090246
Barbara P. Yawn
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson Pace
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen Dietrich
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Bertram
RN, MSN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margary Kurland
RN, BSN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Graham
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Huff
MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liliana Rocca
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Wollan
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008; 299: 211–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    van Weel C, Smith H, Beasley JW. Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 938–43.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007; 297: 403–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Westfall JM, VanVorst RF, Main DS, Herbert C. Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 8–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Nelson AF, et al. Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 459–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    van Weel C. Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(Suppl 1): S46–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(Suppl 1): S12–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. van Weel C, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Mold J. The importance of longitudinal studies in family medicine: experiences of two practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 69–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Kuo GM, Steinbauer JR, Spann SJ. Conducting medication safety research projects in a primary care physician practice-based research network. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2008; 48: 163–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. Lindbloom EJ, Ewigman BG, Hickner JM. Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med Care 2004; 42(4 Suppl): III45–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. Anderko L, Bartz C, Lundeen S. Practice-based research networks: nursing centers and communities working collaboratively to reduce health disparities. Nurs Clin North Am 2005; 40: 747–58, xi-xii.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. Finch SA, Lalama C, Spino C, et al. Practice-based research network solutions to methodological challenges encountered in a national, prospective cohort study of mothers and newborns. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22: 87–98.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Spontaneous abortion in primary care. A report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract 1988; 1: 15–23.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Mold JW, Thompson DM. Management of brown recluse spider bites in primary care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 347–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. Lydick E, Martin A, Yawn B. Impact of fears on quality of life in patients with a silent disease: osteoporosis. Clin Ther 1996; 18: 1307–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. Cacy J, Mold JW. The clinical characteristics of brown recluse spider bites treated by family physicians: an OKPRN Study. Oklahoma Physicians Research Network. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 536–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. Yawn BP, Barrette BA, Wollan PC. Ovarian cancer: the neglected diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 1277–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. Yawn BP, Saddier P, Wollan PC, St Sauver JL, Kurland MJ, Sy LS. A population-based study of the incidence and complication rates of herpes zoster before zoster vaccine introduction. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82: 1341–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Yawn BP, Wollan P, Kurland M, Scanlon P. A longitudinal study of the prevalence of asthma in a community population of school-age children. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 576–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. Yawn B, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Gotler RS, Stange KC. The anatomy of asthma care visits in community family practice. J Asthma 2002; 39: 719–28.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. Chandler JM, Martin AR, Girman C, et al. Reliability of an Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life survey instrument for use in the community: OPTQoL. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 127–35.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Olson Al, Dietrich AJ, Prazar G, Hurley J. Brief maternal depression screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 207–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE, Williams JW, et al. Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329: 602–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Yawn B, Bertram S, Wollan P. Introduction of Asthma APGAR tools improve asthma management in primary care practices. J Asthma Allergy. Available at http://www.dovepress.com/introduction-of-asthma-apgar-tools-improve-asthma-management-in-primar-peer-reviewed-article-JAA. Accessed 27 May 2010.
  25. ↵
    Tierney WM, Oppenheimer CC, Hudson BL, et al. A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 242–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. Fagnan LJ, Morris C, Shipman SA, Holub J, King A, Angier H. Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network (ORPRN) survey tools. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20: 204–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. Niebauer L, Nutting PA. Practice-based research networks: the view from the office. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 409–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Love MM, Pearce KA, Williamson MA, Barron MA, Shelton BJ. Patients, practices, and relationships: challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 75–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. Goode JV, Mott DA, Chater R. Collaborations to facilitate success of community pharmacy practice-based research networks. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2008; 48: 153–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. Nyiendo J, Llyod C Haas M. Practice-based research: the Oregon Experience. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001; 24: 25–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Zafar A, Tierney W, Hickner J, Pace W. An adverse drug event and medication error reporting system for ambulatory care (MEADERS). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008; 839–43.
  32. ↵
    Cifuentes M, Fernald DH, Green LA, et al. Prescription for health: changing primary care practice to foster healthy behaviors. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(Suppl 2): S4–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(Suppl 1): S12–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. Deshefy-Longhi T, Swartz MK, Grey M. Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008; 20: 281–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. van Weel C, de Grauw W. Family practices registration networks contributed to primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 779–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. Andrews JE, Pearce KA, Ireson C, Love MM. Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). J Med Libr Assoc 2005; 93: 206–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. Orzano A, Scott J, Hudson S, et al. Strategies for conducting complex clinical trials in diverse community practices. Medical Care 2007; 45: 1221–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. Voorhees K, Fernald DH, Emsermann C, et al. Underinsurance in primary care: a report from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). J Am Board Fam Med 2008; 21: 309–16.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Young WF, McGloin J, Zittleman L, West DR, Westfall JM. Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network. J Rural Health 2007; 23: 238–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Yawn B, Graham D, Bertram S, et al. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22: 453–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Crabtree BC, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
  42. ↵
    Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Streiff KA, et al. Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team. Health Serv Res 2002; 37: 775–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27: 63–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. Pearson ML, Wu S, Schaefer J, et al. Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 978–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML. Quality improvement in primary care: the role of organization, collaboratives, and managed care. In: McLaughlin CP, Kalunzny AD, eds. Continuous quality improvement in head care: theory, implementation, and applications. 3rd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 2005: 297–317.
  46. ↵
    Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness. Eff Clin Pract 1998; 1: 1–4.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Solberg LI. Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn't tell us. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000; 26: 525–37.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    Kuo HT, Yin TJ, Li IC. Relationship between organization empowerment and job satisfaction as perceived by nursing assistants at long-term care facilities. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 3059–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. Harrisson M, Loiselle CG, Duquette A, Semenic SE. Hardiness, work support and psychological distress among nursing assistants and registered nurses in Quebec. J Adv Nurs 2002; 38: 584–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. Friesen D. Skill mix literature review. Healthc Manage Forum 1996; 9: 48–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. Stearns SC, D'Arcy LP. Staying the course: facility and profession retention among nursing assistants in nursing homes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008; 63: S113–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Bate SP, Robert G. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Admin 2002; 80: 243–63.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 345–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. Lindenauer PK. Effects of quality improvement collaboratives. BMJ 2008; 336: 1448–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Cohen D, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, et al. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag 2004; 49: 155–68, discussion 169–70.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  56. Miller WL, Crabtree BF, McDaniel RR, Stange KC. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 369–76.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, Stange KC. Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 872–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    Peter M. Senge. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House; 1994.
  59. Solberg LI. Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 251–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    Snyder L, Neubauer RL. Pay-for-performance principles that promote patient-centered care: an ethics manifesto. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 792–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. Mandel KE, Kotagal UR. Pay for performance alone cannot drive quality. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161: 650–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. Foels T, Hewner S. Integrating pay for performance with educational strategies to improve diabetes care. Popul Health Manag 2009; 12: 121–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    Green LA, Hickner J. A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 1–10.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Green LA, Hames CG Sr, Nutting PA. Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from ASPN. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 400–6.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 4
July-August 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Practice Benefit from Participating in a Practice-based Research Network Study of Postpartum Depression: A National Research Network (NRN) Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Practice Benefit from Participating in a Practice-based Research Network Study of Postpartum Depression: A National Research Network (NRN) Report
Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Allen Dietrich, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham, Jessica Huff, Liliana Rocca, Peter Wollan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2010, 23 (4) 455-464; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090246

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Practice Benefit from Participating in a Practice-based Research Network Study of Postpartum Depression: A National Research Network (NRN) Report
Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Allen Dietrich, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham, Jessica Huff, Liliana Rocca, Peter Wollan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2010, 23 (4) 455-464; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090246
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • What Do We Get From Participating in Practice-based Research Networks?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Practitioner Participation in National Dental Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Studies: 12-Year Results
  • Preventing the Voltage Drop: Keeping Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Practices Engaged in Studies
  • TRIPPD: A Practice-Based Network Effectiveness Study of Postpartum Depression Screening and Management
  • A Randomized Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Trial in the Iowa Research Network (IRENE): Study Recruitment Methods and Baseline Results
  • No Longer Simply a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN): Health Improvement Networks
  • What Do We Get From Participating in Practice-based Research Networks?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Bridging the Gaps between Communities, Funders, and Policymakers
  • Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
  • Lessons from Initiating the First Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-based Research Network (WH-PBRN) Study
Show more About Practice-Based Research Networks

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire