Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Health Literacy Instrument in Family Medicine: The “Newest Vital Sign” Ease of Use and Correlates

Lisa Ciccarelli Shah, Patricia West, Katazryna Bremmeyr and Ruth T. Savoy-Moore
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2010, 23 (2) 195-203; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.070278
Lisa Ciccarelli Shah
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia West
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katazryna Bremmeyr
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth T. Savoy-Moore
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Tester verbally administers the questions on the left. The patient holds and uses the ice cream nutrition label on right to answer 6 questions. (NVS screening tool originally printed by Weiss, et al16 in 2005.) Reprinted with permission from “Quick Assessment of Literacy in Primary Care: The Newest Vital Sign, ” November/December 2005, Annals of Family Medicine. Copyright © 2005 American Academy of Family Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Health literacy decreases with age. Age by decades is plotted against adequate health literacy. The youngest participant was 13; the oldest was 91. There was a significant effect of age category on health literacy (χ2 P < .0005). Total number of patients in each age bracket is shown within each bar.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    A higher percentage (55%) of adults having adequate health literacy had taken a health class in school (left; n = 800; χ2 P < .0005), but this relationship was not true for teens still in school (right; n = 206; P = .485). Having taken a health class in school was a predictor in the logistic regression analysis for adults but not for teens. NVS, Newest Vital Sign.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4.

    Body mass index, categorized using World Health Organization criteria, is depicted against adequate health literacy for adults (solid bars) and teens (dotted bars). There was no association of BMI with health literacy level among either group when evaluated by analysis of variance (P > .05) or BMI category (χ2 P > .05). However, BMI category was the fourth of 5 predictors in the logistic regression analysis for adult participants (odds ratio, 1.040; 95% CI, 1.016–1.065) and second of 2 predictors among teen athletes (odds ratio, 1.087; 95% CI, 0.999–1.182). The number within each bar represents the number of patients with adequate literacy per group. No teen athlete fell in the Obesity II or Extreme Obesity BMI categories.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Proportion of Patients with Adequate Health Literacy*

    VariableAdequate Literacy (%)
    Adult (n = 808)Athletes‡ (n = 206)
    Gender × race†
        White female63.2 (222/351)65.5 (57/87)
        White male47.5 (95/200)61.0 (61/100)
        Non-white female30.1 (53/176)44.4 (4/9)
        Non-white male23.0 (17/74)10.0 (1/16)
    Smoking status
        Current smoker or quit <5 years ago44.862.5 (5/8)
        Never smoked or quit >5 years ago50.459.6 (118/198)
    Education level
        ≤11th grade16.7100
        High school graduate or GED34.4
        Some college54.9
        College graduate; may have done postgraduate work77.5
    Self-reported health status
        Fair or poor32.30.0
        Good58.165.6
        Excellent or very good57.059.3
    Taken a health class55.057.3
    • * Adequate refers to an Newest Vital Sign score of 3 to 6.

    • † Includes African American (23.4%), American Indian (1%), Asian (0.3%), and multiracial (0.5%)

    • ‡ Includes middle-school and high-school students who were approached at preparticipation sports physicals.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Variables Predicting Adequate Health Literacy in Logistic Regression Analysis

    Predictor VariableAdult (n = 778)MS and HS Athletes (n = 206)
    Gender × race*
        White female11
        White male0.497 (0.328–0.753)0.713 (0.384–1.324)
        Non-white female0.177 (0.111–0.282)0.295 (0.068–1.269)
        Non-white male0.210 (0.110–0.398)0.045 (0.005–0.381)
    Age0.953 (0.941- 0.965)—
    Education level
        11th grade or less1—
        High school graduate or GED1.80 (0.909–3.565)
        Some college3.667 (1.869–7.195)
        College graduate; may have postgraduate work12.019 (5.650–25.570)
    BMI1.040 (1.016–1.065)1.087 (0.999–1.182)
    Taken a health class1.536 (1.056-.235)—
    • Values provided as odds ratio (95% CI). MS, middle school; HS, high school; BMI, body mass index.

    • * Includes African American (23.4%), American Indian (1%), Asian (0.3%), and multiracial (0.5%).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Correct Response Percentage for Adults and Young Athletes

    Question No.Abbreviated QuestionPercent Answering Correctly
    Adults (n = 778)Young Athletes (n = 206)
    1Calories in entire ice cream carton?54.552.9
    2How much ice cream has 60 g carbohydrates?56.966.0
    3Grams saturated fat in 1 serving?30.754.9
    4What % of 2500 calorie daily intake is in this ice cream pint?39.748.5
    5If allergic to peanuts, can you eat this ice cream?71.882.0
    6If not, why not?61.477.7
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 2
March-April 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health Literacy Instrument in Family Medicine: The “Newest Vital Sign” Ease of Use and Correlates
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Health Literacy Instrument in Family Medicine: The “Newest Vital Sign” Ease of Use and Correlates
Lisa Ciccarelli Shah, Patricia West, Katazryna Bremmeyr, Ruth T. Savoy-Moore
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (2) 195-203; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.070278

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Health Literacy Instrument in Family Medicine: The “Newest Vital Sign” Ease of Use and Correlates
Lisa Ciccarelli Shah, Patricia West, Katazryna Bremmeyr, Ruth T. Savoy-Moore
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (2) 195-203; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.070278
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Functional health literacy in a population-based sample in Florence: a cross-sectional study using the Newest Vital Sign
  • Heart Failure and Low Health Literacy: Mitigating This Lethal Combination
  • Peanut Butter and Patient Education
  • Do Subjective Measures Improve the Ability to Identify Limited Health Literacy in a Clinical Setting?
  • Brief Health Literacy Screening Items Predict Newest Vital Sign Scores
  • Health literacy: A primer for pharmacists
  • Time, Costs, and Clinical Utilization of Screening for Health Literacy: A Case Study Using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) Instrument
  • Key Questions and Technology in Clinical Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire