Response: Re: Interventions to Improving Osteoporosis Screening: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study

References

1. ↵
   Payne E. Re: Interventions to improving osteoporosis screening: An Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 132.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. ↵
   Levy BT, Hartz A, Woodworth G, Xu Y, Sinift S. Interventions to improving osteoporosis screening: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22: 360–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   Boulware LE, Barnes GJ, Wilson RF, et al. Value of the periodic health evaluation. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(136): 1–134.
4. Boulware LE, Marinopoulos S, Phillips KA, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 289–300.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. Fenton JJ, Cai Y, Weiss NS, et al. Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination? Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 580–5.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 635–41.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Rosenthal TC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2008; 21: 427–40.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   National Committee for Quality Assurance. 2008. Standards and guidelines for physician practice connections—Patient-centered medical home (PPC-PCMH). Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2008: 68. Available at http://www.bethesda.med.navy.mil/Patient/Health_Care/Medical_Services/Internal_Medicine/MeasuresSuccess/Medical%20Home(NCQA%20Stnds%20and%20Guidelines).pdf. Accessed 16 October 2009.
9. ↵
   Sandy LG, Bodenheimer T, Pawlson LG, Starfield B. The political economy of US primary care. Health Aff 2009; 28: 1136–45.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text