Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patients’ Survival Expectations before Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment by Treatment Status

Ravinder Mohan, Hind Beydoun, Myra L. Barnes-Ely, LaShonda Lee, John W. Davis, Raymond Lance and Paul Schellhammer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2009, 22 (3) 247-256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080200
Ravinder Mohan
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hind Beydoun
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Myra L. Barnes-Ely
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LaShonda Lee
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Davis
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond Lance
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Schellhammer
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Comparison of Sociodemographic Characteristics of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer who Chose Treatment* and Observation†

    CharacteristicOverall (n [%])Treatment (n [%])Observation (n [%])P‡
    Age (years)n = 184n = 161n = 23
        <6071 (38.6)68 (42.2)3 (13.0)
        60–7091 (49.5)81 (50.3)10 (43.5)
        >7022 (11.9)12 (7.5)10 (43.5)<.0001
        Mean ± SD61.5 ± 7.960.6 ± 7.668.2 ± 5.9<.0001
    Racen = 184n = 161n = 23
        African American26 (14.1)26 (16.2)0 (0.0)
        White158 (85.9)135 (83.9)23 (100).05§
    Educationn = 180n = 157n = 23
        <High school7 (3.9)7 (4.5)0 (0.0)
        High school65 (36.1)56 (35.7)9 (39.1)
        College108 (60.0)94 (59.9)14 (60.9).58
    Health literacyn = 173n = 150n = 23
        Below 6th grade1 (0.6)1 (0.7)0 (0.0)
        6th-9th grade16 (9.3)15 (10.0)1 (4.4)
        >9th grade156 (90.2)134 (89.3)22 (95.7).63
    Family incomen = 179n = 156n = 23
        Low (<$50,000)57 (31.8)50 (32.0)7 (30.4)
        High (≥$50,000)122 (68.2)106 (67.9)16 (69.6).88
    • * Treatment patients had either surgery or radiotherapy.

    • † Observation patients had neither surgery nor radiotherapy.

    • ‡ Unless otherwise specified, statistical significance is for χ2 test (categorical variables) or independent samples t test (continuous variable).

    • § Fisher's exact test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparison of Patients who Chose Treatment and Observation by Prostate Cancer-Related and Health Factors

    FactorsOverall (n [%])Treatment (n [%])Observation (n [%])P*
    Gleason Graden = 184n = 161N = 23
        2–40 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
        5–6103 (55.9)84 (52.1)19 (82.6)
        762 (33.7)60 (37.3)2 (8.7)
        8–1019 (10.3)17 (10.6)2 (8.7)0.02
        Mean ± SD6.6 ± 0.76.6 ± 0.76.2 ± 0.70.02
    Prostate-specific antigen testn = 183n = 161n = 23
        ≤10159 (86.9)139 (86.3)21 (91.3)
        >1024 (13.1)22 (13.7)2 (8.7)0.74
        Mean ± SD6.7 ± 5.36.8 ± 5.55.6 ± 3.40.14
    Life expectancy by age (years)n = 183n = 160N = 23
        <104 (2.2)2 (1.3)2 (8.7)
        10–20104 (56.8)86 (53.8)18 (78.3)
        ≥2075 (40.9)72 (45.0)3 (13.0)0.002*
    Comorbidity scoren = 184n = 161N = 23
        074 (40.2)66 (40.9)8 (34.8)
        175 (40.8)67 (41.6)8 (34.8)
        227 (14.7)23 (14.3)4 (17.4)
        ≥38 (4.4)5 (3.1)3 (13.0)0.16
        Mean ± SD0.9 ± 1.00.83 ± 0.961.26 ± 1.50.18
    Short Form-36 subscales
        Physical component summaryn = 142n = 134n = 8
            Mean ± SD54.5 ± 7.654.5 ± 7.252.6 ± 12.30.66
        Mental component summaryn = 142n = 134n = 8
            Mean ± SD44.1 ± 6.843.9 ± 6.946.4 ± 4.50.29
    Prostate cancer index
        Urinaryn = 141n = 132n = 9
            Mean ± SD90.2 ± 16.990.1 ± 17.491.3 ± 9.30.83
        Boweln = 142n = 133n = 9
            Mean ± SD88.8 ± 12.588.5 ± 12.892.9 ± 4.50.03
        Sexualn = 137n = 128n = 9
            Mean ± SD57.7 ± 29.957.8 ± 30.455.4 ± 23.80.82
        Urinary Bothern = 144n = 135n = 9
            Mean ± SD86.1 ± 23.085.9 ± 23.488.9 ± 18.20.71
        Bowel Bothern = 144n = 135n = 9
            Mean ± SD92.5 ± 17.592.0 ± 17.9100 ± 0.0<0.0001
        Sexual Bothern = 142n = 133n = 9
            Mean ± SD65.8 ± 36.865.4 ± 36.872.2 ± 38.40.59
    Fear of cancer recurrencen = 141n = 133n = 8
        Mean ± SD10.7 ± 3.810.7 ± 3.710.9 ± 4.50.92
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Distribution of Men by Prostate Cancer-Related and Health Characteristics

    CharacteristicOverall (n [%])Treatment (n [%])* **Observation (n [%])† ***P‡*
    Comorbidity adjusted life expectancy (CALE)
        All ages184 (100)161 (100)23 (100)
         <5 years1 (0.5)0 (0)1 (4.3)
        5–10 years4 (2.2)2 (1.2)2 (8.7)
        11–19 years67 (36.4)52 (32.3)15 (65.2)
        ≥20 years112 (60.9)107 (66.5)5 (21.7)<.0001
        Mean ± SD22.9 ± 7.623.9 ± 7.316.4 ± 5.7<.0001
    Anxiety scoren = 183n = 160n = 23
        None/normal (0–7)145 (79.2)123 (76.9)22 (95.7)
        Mild anxiety (8–10)23 (12.6)23 (14.4)0 (0.0)
        Moderate anxiety (11–14)12 (6.6)11 (6.9)1 (4.4)
        Clinical (15–21)3 (1.6)3 (1.9)0 (0.0).18
        Mean ± SD5.1 ± 3.55.4 ± 3.52.8 ± 2.9.0008
    Depression scoren = 178n = 156n = 22
        None/normal (0–7)172 (96.6)150 (96.2)22 (100)
        Mild depression (8–10)4 (2.3)4 (2.6)0 (0.0)
        Moderate (11–14)1 (0.6)1 (0.6)0 (0.0)
        Clinical (15–21)1 (0.6)1 (0.6)0 (0.0).83
        Mean ± SD1.7 ± 2.31.7 ± 2.41.4 ± 1.7.49
    Functional capacityn = 184n = 160n = 23
        Mild activities (<3 METs)1 (0.5)1 (0.6)0 (0.0)
        Moderate activities (3–6 METs)20 (10.9)15 (9.3)5 (21.7)
        Vigorous activities (≥6 METs)163 (88.6)145 (90.1)18 (78.3).19
    Social supportn = 183n = 160n = 23
        <507 (3.8)6 (3.8)1 (4.4)
        50–7533 (18.0)29 (18.1)4 (17.4)
        75–100143 (78.1)125 (78.1)18 (78.3).98
    Satisfaction with Lifen = 178n = 156n = 22
        Delighted or highly satisfied138 (77.5)121 (77.6)17 (77.3)
        Satisfied or lower40 (22.5)35 (22.4)5 (22.7).97
        Mean ± SD6.0 ± 0.95.9 ± 0.96.1 ± 1.0.64
    Satisfaction with healthn = 178n = 156n = 22
        Delighted or highly satisfied85 (47.8)72 (46.1)13 (59.1)
        Satisfied or lower93 (52.3)84 (53.9)9 (40.9).26
        Mean ± SD5.0 ± 1.35.0 ± 1.35.4 ± 1.4.19
    Satisfaction with education by physiciann = 178n = 156n = 22
        Delighted or highly satisfied141 (79.2)126 (80.8)15 (68.2)
        Satisfied or lower37 (20.8)30 (19.2)7 (31.8).17
        Mean ± SD6.1 ± 0.96.1 ± 0.95.9 ± 1.1.1
    • * Treatment patients had either surgery or radiotherapy.

    • † Observation patients had neither surgery nor radiotherapy.

    • ‡ Unless otherwise specified, statistical significance is for χ2 test (categorical variables) or independent samples t test (continuous variable).

    • MET, metabolic equivalent.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Distribution of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer by Calculated Comorbidity Adjusted Life Expectancy

    Expected Survival (years)Baseline CALE Score (n = 184)Q1 (n = 170)Q2 (n = 170)
    <51 (0.5)26 (15.2)1 (0.6)
    5–104 (2.2)83 (48.8)11 (6.5)
    11–1967 (36.4)57 (33.5)51 (30.0)
    ≥20112 (60.9)4 (2.4)107 (62.9)
    • Data provided as n (%).

    • CALE, comorbidity adjusted life expectancy; Q1, How long do you expect you will live without any treatment for prostate cancer?; Q2, How long do you expect you will live after the treatment of your choice for prostate cancer?

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Ordinal Logistic Regression Modeling for Perceived Decrease in Longevity with Observation (PDLO) among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

    Unadjusted EffectsAdjusted Effects OR (95% CI)
    PDLO ≤0*PDLO = 1†PDLO ≥2‡OR (95% CI)
    Age2562831.08 (1.04–1.13)1.01 (0.92–1.10)
    PSA level2562820.94 (0.88–1.00)0.93 (0.86–1.00)
    CALE2562830.92 (0.88–0.96)0.93 (0.84–1.02)
    Anxiety score2562830.88 (0.81–0.96)0.96 (0.85–1.08)
    Depression score2558820.79 (0.67–0.93)0.85 (0.69–1.04)
    • * A (PDLO) ≤0 (reference group) indicates that CALE and self-reported survival expectation without treatment are within the same range or CALE is less.

    • † A (PDLO) = 1 suggests that CALE exceeds self-reported survival expectation without treatment by one response category.

    • ‡ A (PDLO) ≥2 suggests that CALE exceeds self-reported survival expectation without treatment by at least 2 response categories (ie., about 10 years). All covariates in the ordinal logistic regression model are defined as continuous variables.

    • PDLO, perceived decrease in longevity with observation (categorized); PSA, prostate-specific antigen; CALE, comorbidity adjusted life expectancy; OR, odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Ordinal Logistic Regression Modeling for Perceived Increase in Longevity with Treatment (PILT) among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

    Unadjusted effectsAdjusted effects OR (95% CI)
    PILT ≤0*PILT = 1†PILT ≥2‡OR (95% CI)
    Age1887651.08 (1.04–1.13)1.09 (0.99–1.19)
    CALE1887650.93 (0.89–0.97)1.02 (0.93–1.12)
    Anxiety score1887650.89 (0.82–0.98)0.91 (0.81–1.02)
    Depression score1883640.93 (0.82–1.05)1.06 (0.89–1.26)
    Social support1887651.01 (0.99–1.03)1.00 (0.98–1.02)
    • * PILT ≤0 (reference group) indicates that CALE and self-reported survival expectation with treatment are within the same range or CALE is less.

    • † A (PILT) = 1 suggests that CALE exceeds self-reported survival expectation with treatment by one response category.

    • ‡ A (PILT) ≥2 suggests that CALE exceeds self-reported survival expectation with treatment by at least 2 response categories (ie., about 10 years). All covariates in the ordinal logistic regression model are defined as continuous variables.

    • PILT, perceived increase in longevity with treatment (categorized); CALE, comorbidity adjusted life expectancy; OR, odds ratio.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 3
May-June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients’ Survival Expectations before Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment by Treatment Status
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patients’ Survival Expectations before Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment by Treatment Status
Ravinder Mohan, Hind Beydoun, Myra L. Barnes-Ely, LaShonda Lee, John W. Davis, Raymond Lance, Paul Schellhammer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2009, 22 (3) 247-256; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patients’ Survival Expectations before Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment by Treatment Status
Ravinder Mohan, Hind Beydoun, Myra L. Barnes-Ely, LaShonda Lee, John W. Davis, Raymond Lance, Paul Schellhammer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2009, 22 (3) 247-256; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080200
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Do psychological harms result from being labelled with an unexpected diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm or prostate cancer through screening? A systematic review
  • Patients Survival Expectations With and Without Their Chosen Treatment for Prostate Cancer
  • Impact of Comorbidity on Survival Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
  • Providing Quality Primary Care to Older Adults
  • In This Issue: Mini-Theme on Geriatric Care and Cancer Screening
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire