Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians

David Katerndahl, Michael Parchman and Robert Wood
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2009, 22 (1) 24-33; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080027
David Katerndahl
MD, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Parchman
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Wood
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Predicted probability of career satisfaction as interaction between patient complexity and perceived autonomy.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Primary Care Physicians and Their Practices Included in the Three Waves of the Community Tracking Survey

    Characteristic1996–1997 (n = 7197)1998–1999 (n = 7264)2000–2001 (n = 7673)
    Physician Characteristics (%)
        Gender (female)252932
        Race (white)—7776
        Specialty
            Internal medicine333333
            Family medicine444243
            Pediatrics232424
        Began practice (after 1975)737984
        Salaried535553
    Practice environment
        Number of practices (% one practice)929292
        Weeks practicing in 1995 (mean ± SD)47.8 ± 2.747.8 ± 2.647.7 ± 2.7
        Hours per week in direct patient care (mean ± SD)42.7 ± 12.942.2 ± 12.944.3 ± 13.1
        Type of practice (% solo practice)252222
        Number of physicians at practice (mean ± SD)26.2 ± 54.626.2 ± 54.2—
        Number of assistants (mean ± SD)3.2 ± 5.83.2 ± 5.8—
        Reimbursement
            % Medicaid (mean ± SD)15.0 ± 18.415.5 ± 18.515.8 ± 18.6
            % Medicare (mean ± SD)27.7 ± 23.027.4 ± 22.927.9 ± 22.9
            % Managed Care (mean ± SD)47.5 ± 28.251.0 ± 27.849.4 ± 27.8
        Cares for both adults and children (%)4039—
    Complexity of expected care (% greater than it should be)24.524.827.0
    Perceived autonomy (% having freedom)85.883.586.2
    Career satisfaction (% satisfied with career)80.780.079.7
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Staged Logistic Regressions for 1996 to 1997 Panel

    VariablesPhysician Variables OnlyPhysician + Practice VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effect VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effect + Perception Variables
    Physician variables
        Race (white)————
        Gender (female)-0.042 (0.077)-0.008 (0.085)-0.003 (0.087)-0.051 (0.089)
        Salaried0.392 (0.062)§0.001 (0.091)0.007 (0.092)-0.033 (0.095)
        Specialty
            Internal medicine0.781 (0.293)†0.835 (0.355)*0.821 (0.356)*0.721 (0.387)
            Family practice0.963 (0.292)§0.872 (0.357)*0.890 (0.358)*0.746 (0.390)
            Pediatrics1.368 (0.299)§1.399 (0.364)§1.411 (0.365)§1.251 (0.397)‡
        Began practice after 19750.401 (0.067)§0.311 (0.077)§0.316 (0.078)§0.360 (0.081)
        Importance of control over decisions (very important)————
    Practice variables
        Weeks practicing per year (n)-0.023 (0.013)-0.021 (0.014)-0.018 (0.014)
        Hours per week in patient care (n)0.001 (0.003)0.000 (0.003)0.002 (0.003)
        Multiple practices-0.187 (0.121)-0.190 (0.122)-0.120 (0.128)
        Solo practice-0.676 (0.094)§-0.681 (0.095)§-0.678 (0.098)§
        No assistants-0.155 (0.078)*-0.144 (0.079)-0.070 (0.082)
        Frequently obtain high quality services
            Ancillary Services0.451 (0.104)§0.441 (0.106)§0.230 (0.111)*
            Imaging0.337 (0.147)*0.309 (0.150)*0.184 (0.155)
            Mental health care0.241 (0.069)§0.245 (0.070)§0.120 (0.072)
            Referrals0.744 (0.139)§0.750 (0.142)§0.592 (0.147)§
        Revenue
            From Medicaid (%)0.001 (0.002)0.001 (0.002)0.001 (0.002)
            From Medicare (%)-0.003 (0.002)*-0.003 (0.002)*-0.004 (0.002)*
            From managed care (%)-0.007 (0.001)§-0.006 (0.001)§-0.006 (0.001)§
        Care for adults and children0.194 (0.165)0.194 (0.167)0.198 (0.172)
        Patients with formulary (%)———
    Effect variables
        Moderate effect on practice
            Computer-generated patient data0.085 (0.072)0.087 (0.074)
            Guidelines-0.102 (0.073)-0.030 (0.075)
            Patient profiles-0.004 (0.075)0.093 (0.078)
            Reminders-0.035 (0.075)0.027 (0.077)
            Patient surveys-0.065 (0.074)-0.082 (0.076)
            Computer-generated treatment alternative0.037 (0.082)0.025 (0.085)
            Information Technology (IT) uses (n)——
    Perceptions variables
        Expected complexity-0.683 (0.079)§
        Perceived autonomy0.873 (0.086)§
    Χ2 (p)145.50 (0.000)360.55 (0.000)359.97 (0.000)567.02 (0.000)
    -2LogL6890.35903.55766.95486.5
    Hosmer-Lemeshow Χ2 (p)5.13 (0.645)13.20 (0.105)9.37 (0.312)25.79 (0.001)
    Nagelkerke Adjusted R20.0320.0880.0890.140
    • All data provided as β (SE).

    • * P ≤ .05.

    • † P ≤ .01.

    • ‡ P ≤ .005.

    • § P ≤ .001.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Staged Logistic Regressions for 1998 to 1999 Panel

    VariablesPhysician Variables OnlyPhysician + Practice VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effects VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effect + Perception Variables
    Physician Variables
        Race (white)0.259 (0.070)§0.209 (0.079)†0.183 (0.082)*-0.171 (0.085)*
        Gender (female)0.000 (0.070)0.010 (0.079)0.009 (0.080)0.061 (0.083)
        Salaried0.396 (0.060)§0.097 (0.084)0.110 (0.085)0.108 (0.088)
        Specialty
            Internal medicine0.609 (0.307)*0.716 (0.359)*0.707 (0.360)*0.775 (0.371)*
            Family practice0.865 (0.306)‡0.732 (0.360)*0.767 (0.362)*0.782 (0.373)*
            Pediatrics1.208 (0.311)§1.276 (0.368)§1.274 (0.370)§1.298 (0.381)§
        Began practice after 19750.291 (0.072)§0.349 (0.082)§0.351 (0.083)§0.331 (0.087)§
        Importance of control of decisions (Very Important)————
    Practice variables
        Weeks practicing per year (n)-0.032 (0.014)*-0.031 (0.014)*-0.021 (0.014)
        Hours per week in patient care (n)-0.003 (0.003)-0.003 (0.003)-0.001 (0.003)
        Multiple practices-0.221 (0.117)-0.196 (0.119)-0.199 (0.123)
        Solo practice-0.211 (0.094)*-0.188 (0.095)*-0.197 (0.099)*
        No assistants-0.185 (0.078)*-0.155 (0.080)-0.104 (0.083)
        Frequently obtain high-quality services
            Ancillary services0.418 (0.094)§0.419 (0.095)§0.253 (0.099)*
            Imaging0.647 (0.142)§0.602 (0.144)§0.406 (0.149)†
            Mental health care0.522 (0.070)§0.531 (0.070)§0.381 (0.073)§
            Referrals0.405 (0.141)‡0.414 (0.142)‡0.209 (0.146)
        Revenue
            From Medicaid (%)0.002 (0.002)0.002 (0.002)0.001 (0.002)
            From Medicare (%)-0.003 (0.002)-0.004 (0.002)*-0.004 (0.002)*
            From managed care (%)-0.004 (0.001)‡-0.004 (0.001)‡-0.003 (0.001)*
        Care for adults and children0.269 (0.165)0.249 (0.167)0.305 (0.172)
        Patients with formulary (%)———
    Effect variables
        Moderate effect on practice
            Computer-generated patient data0.100 (0.070)0.067 (0.073)
            Guidelines-0.129 (0.072)-0.090 (0.074)
            Patient profiles0.025 (0.075)0.066 (0.077)
            Reminders-0.052 (0.073)0.018 (0.075)
            Patient surveys-0.016 (0.070)-0.020 (0.073)
            Computer-generated treatment alternative0.128 (0.075)0.162 (0.078)*
            Information Technology (IT) uses (n)——
    Perceptions variables
        Expected complexity-0.539 (0.078)§
        Perceived autonomy1.029 (0.081)§
    Χ2 (p)146.93 (0.000)371.54 (0.000)370.72 (0.000)614.67 (0.000)
    -2LogL7127.16079.55968.95637.2
    Hosmer-Lemeshow Χ2 (p)14.26 (0.075)11.48 (0.176)12.35 (0.136)11.20 (0.191)
    Nagelkerke Adjusted R20.0320.0890.0900.149
    • All data provided as β (SE).

    • * P ≤ .05.

    • † P ≤ .01.

    • ‡ P ≤ .005.

    • § P ≤ .001.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Staged Logistic Regressions for 2000 to 2001 Panel

    VariablesPhysician Variables OnlyPhysician + Practice VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effects VariablesPhysician + Practice + Effect + Perceptions Variables
    Physician Variables
        Race (white)0.080 (0.071)0.049 (0.080)0.081 (0.083)0.069 (0.085)
        Gender (female)-0.024 (0.068)-0.079 (0.076)-0.083 (0.077)-0.077 (0.079)
        Salaried0.341 (0.060)§0.056 (0.076)0.049 (0.077)0.022 (0.079)
        Specialty
            Internal medicine-0.034 (0.331)-0.092 (0.379)-0.076 (0.380)-0.159 (0.395)
            Family practice0.143 (0.331)0.106 (0.378)0.113 (0.379)0.048 (0.394)
            Pediatrics0.700 (0.336)*0.732 (0.387)0.759 (0.387)*0.653 (0.403)
        Began practice after 19750.103 (0.080)0.261 (0.091)‡0.243 (0.092)†0.232 (0.094)*
        Importance of control of decisions (very important)-0.046 (0.066)-0.078 (0.073)-0.068 (0.073)-0.028 (0.075)
    Practice variables
        Weeks practicing per year (n)-0.040 (0.013)‡-0.036 (0.013)†-0.030 (0.014)*
        Hours per week in patient care (n)-0.011 (0.003)§-0.011 (0.003)§-0.010 (0.003)§
        Multiple practices-0.168 (0.118)-0.171 (0.119)-0.184 (0.121)
        Solo practice-0.369 (0.084)§-0.351 (0.085)§-0.308 (0.087)§
        No assistants———
        Frequently obtain high-quality services
            Ancillary services0.444 (0.094)§0.446 (0.095)§0.267 (0.099)†
            Imaging0.284 (0.142)*0.301 (0.143)*0.164 (0.147)
            Mental health care0.404 (0.070)§0.374 (0.070)§0.270 (0.072)§
            Referrals0.545 (0.126)§0.564 (0.127)§0.379 (0.132)‡
        Revenue
            From Medicaid (%)0.003 (0.002)0.003 (0.002)0.003 (0.002)
            From Medicare (%)-0.002 (0.002)-0.003 (0.002)-0.002 (0.002)
            From managed care (%)-0.004 (0.001)‡-0.004 (0.001)‡-0.003 (0.001)*
        Care for adults and children———
        Patients with formulary (%)-0.001 (0.002)-0.001 (0.002)-0.001 (0.002)
    Effect variables
        Moderate effect on practice
            Computer-generated patient data——
            Guidelines0.005 (0.071)0.038 (0.072)
            Patient profiles-0.047 (0.074)0.016 (0.076)
            Reminders——
            Patient surveys0.176 (0.071)*0.212 (0.073)‡
            Computer-generated treatment alternative——
            Information Technology (IT) uses (#)0.026 (0.018)0.025 (0.019)
    Perceptions variables
        Expected complexity-0.437 (0.078)§
        Perceived autonomy0.934 (0.085)§
    Χ2 (p)118.04 (0.000)345.96 (0.000)352.36 (0.000)516.59 (0.000)
    -2LogL7251.36198.66108.45855.8
    Hosmer-Lemeshow Χ2 (p)3.69 (0.884)13.54 (0.095)5.84 (0.665)6.88 (0.549)
    Nagelkerke Adjusted R20.0250.0810.0830.122
    • All data provided as β (SE).

    • * P ≤ .05.

    • † P ≤ .01.

    • ‡ P ≤ .005.

    • § P ≤ .001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 1
January-February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians
David Katerndahl, Michael Parchman, Robert Wood
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 22 (1) 24-33; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Perceived Complexity of Care, Perceived Autonomy, and Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians
David Katerndahl, Michael Parchman, Robert Wood
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 22 (1) 24-33; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080027
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Advanced practice nursing: Qualitative study of implications for family physicians perceptions of their own work
  • Visit Planning Using a Waiting Room Health IT Tool: The Aligning Patients and Providers Randomized Controlled Trial
  • The Full Scope of Family Physicians Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
  • Staff perceptions of community health centre team function in Ontario
  • Satisfaction of Family Physicians Working in Community Health Centers
  • An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Career Satisfaction of Primary Care Physicians
  • A Method for Estimating Relative Complexity of Ambulatory Care
  • Optimism: A Good Theme for Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire