Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherFamily Medicine –World Perspective

How Should Complementary Practitioners and Physicians Communicate? A Cross-Sectional Study from Israel

Eran Ben-Arye, Moshe Scharf and Moshe Frenkel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2007, 20 (6) 565-571; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070119
Eran Ben-Arye
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moshe Scharf
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moshe Frenkel
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Primary Care Physicians and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners

    CharacteristicPrimary Care Physicians (n = 333)CAM Practitioners (n = 241)
    Sex* (n [%])
        Male187 (58)95 (41)
        Female134 (42)137 (59)
    Age (mean ± SD [median])47.7 ± 7.2 (48)40.2 ± 9.4 (38)
    Medical specialty† (n [%])
        Specialists265 (80)‡
        Family medicine105 (32)
        Internal medicine47 (14)
        Pediatrics9 (3)
    CAM modality (n [%])†
        Movement/manual healing124 (51)§
        Traditional Chinese medicine88 (37)
        Naturopathy29 (12)
        Homeopathy10 (4)
        Herbal medicine9 (4)
        Chiropractic8 (3)
        Healing4 (2)
        Meditation3 (1)
    • Data analysis were performed by t test. CAM, complementary and alternative medicine; SD, standard deviation.

    • * Three hundred twenty-one of 333 primary care physicians and 232 of 241 CAM practitioners reported this data.

    • † Respondents reporting any kind of medical or CAM specialty, which include one or more of the fields specified here.

    • ‡ Eighty-eight physicians (27.3%) reported having studied CAM, with experience ranging from basic introductory courses to full programs. Twenty-four physicians (7.7%) reported practicing CAM. Fifty-two percent reported having used CAM treatments over the past year.

    • § Thirty-one (13%) of the CAM practitioners were physicians.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Areas in Which Respondents Were Interested in Collaborative Teamwork Between Conventional and Complementary and Alternative Medicines

    AreaParticipants* (n [%])P
    Primary Care Physicians (n = 328)CAM Practitioners (n = 226)
    Clinical practice226 (69)174 (77).0430
    Scientific research50 (15)95 (42)<.0001
    Medical education8 (2)61 (27)<.0001
    • Data analysis was performed by Pearson's χ2 test. CAM, complementary and alternative medicine.

    • * Three hundred twenty-eight of 333 primary care physicians and 226 of 241 CAM practitioners responded this question. Respondents were able to choose several options, thus the sum of percents exceeds 100%.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Respondents’ Attitudes to the Question, If Complementary and Alternative Medicine Was Provided in a Primary Care Clinic, Who Should Offer Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatment?

    CAM ProviderParticipants* (n [%])P
    Primary Care Physicians (n = 327; 327 responses)CAM Practitioners (n = 234; 264 responses)
    CAM practitioner non-MD135 (40.9)199 (75.4)<.0001
    CAM practitioner MD119 (36.1)31 (11.7)<.0001
    Family physician in the clinic48 (14.5)9 (3.4)<.0001
    Nurse6 (1.8)5 (2.1)NS
    Pharmacist4 (1.2)4 (1.9)NS
    Other15 (4.5)16 (6.1)NS
    • Data analysis was performed by Pearson's χ2 test. NS, not significant; CAM, complementary and alternative medicine.

    • * Three hundred twenty-seven of 333 primary care physicians and 234 of 241 CAM practitioners responded this question. Respondents were asked to focus on merely one option but were able to choose several options. Thus, number of responses is higher than the number of respondents. The data in the table refer to number of responses.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Respondents’ Attitudes to the Question, How Do You Perceive Conjoint Physician–Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioner Teamwork?

    Team DirectorParticipants* (n [%])P
    Primary Care Physicians (n = 283; responses = 298)CAM Practitioners (n = 198; responses = 227)
    Physician†127 (42.6)43 (18.9).0007
    CAM practitioner†8 (2.7)12 (5.3)NS
    Codirected‡62 (20.8)83 (36.6).0001
    Directed by either physician or CAM practitioner§86 (28.9)60 (26.4)NS
    • Data analysis was performed by Pearson's χ2 test. NS, not significant; CAM, complementary and alternative medicine.

    • * Two hundred eighty-three of 333 primary care physicians and 198 of 241 CAM practitioners responded this question. Respondents were asked to focus on merely one option but were able to choose several options. Thus, number of responses is higher than the number of respondents. The data in the table refer to number of responses.

    • † The head of the team is a physician (or CAM practitioner) that directs and coordinates the treatment.

    • ‡ The physician and CAM practitioner have equal standing, with neither of them heading the team.

    • § The head of the team is determined by the unique characteristics of the patient and his/her illness.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 6
November-December 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Should Complementary Practitioners and Physicians Communicate? A Cross-Sectional Study from Israel
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
How Should Complementary Practitioners and Physicians Communicate? A Cross-Sectional Study from Israel
Eran Ben-Arye, Moshe Scharf, Moshe Frenkel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 20 (6) 565-571; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070119

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Should Complementary Practitioners and Physicians Communicate? A Cross-Sectional Study from Israel
Eran Ben-Arye, Moshe Scharf, Moshe Frenkel
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 20 (6) 565-571; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070119
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Research Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Family Medicine Training Program in the Republic of Georgia: Incorporating a Model of Chronic Disease Management
  • Health Problems Presented to Family Practices in The Netherlands 1 Year Before and 1 Year After a Disaster
Show more Family Medicine –World Perspective

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire