Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Different Waist Circumferences, Different Metabolic Risks in Koreans

Nam Seok Joo, Bom Taeck Kim, Sat Byul Park, Mi Hee Kong, Tae Young Lee and Kwang Min Kim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2007, 20 (3) 258-265; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060064
Nam Seok Joo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bom Taeck Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sat Byul Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mi Hee Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tae Young Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kwang Min Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Mean values for abnormal metabolic parameters for men in the normal group (NG), generally obese group (GOG), centrally obese group (COG), and combined obese group (COM): 3rd National Cholesterol Education Program-Adults Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) Asian guideline. ∗, P > .05, statistically significant difference between groups.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Mean values for abnormal metabolic parameters for women in the normal group (NG), generally obese group (GOG), centrally obese group (COG), and combined obese group (COM): 3rd National Cholesterol Education Program-Adults Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) Asian guideline. ∗, P > .05, statistically significant difference between groups.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Analysis: NG, COG, GOG, and COM Groups of Korean Men and Women

    NG (n = 43,710, 62.9%)COG (n = 3925, 5.6%)GOG (n = 7597, 10.9%)COM (n =14,303, 20.6%)P Value*
    Age (years)Male44.1 ± 9.949.5 ± 10.143.6 ± 8.745.7 ± 9.5<.001
    Female41.8 ± 10.050.8 ± 10.845.3 ± 9.650.9 ± 10.3<.001
    Smoking (pack/year)Male14.0 ± 13.919.2 ± 17.713.3 ± 13.416.5 ± 16.0<.001
    Female0.4 ± 2.40.5 ± 3.10.1 ± 1.50.4 ± 2.7<.001
    Weight (kg)Male63.7 ± 6.671.7 ± 5.073.4 ± 5.180.2 ± 7.4<.001
    Female52.9 ± 5.358.2 ± 4.762.2 ± 4.466.9 ± 6.8<.001
    Waist (cm)Male79.8 ± 5.691.6 ± 1.986.0 ± 2.694.5 ± 4.2<.001
    Female70.3 ± 5.082.8 ± 3.076.3 ± 2.486.8 ± 5.7<.001
    BMI (kg/m2)Male22.1 ± 1.824.0 ± 0.725.9 ± 0.927.5 ± 1.8<.001
    Female21.3 ± 1.923.5 ± 1.125.9 ± 0.929.6 ± 2.2<.001
    • All values are mean ± SD by ANOVA test with post hoc analysis. NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and high WC); BMI, body mass index.

    • * P value by general linear model with age and smoking amount adjustment among groups.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparison of Metabolic Parameters for NG, COG, GOG, and COM Korean Men

    NG (n = 24,215, 60.5%)COG (n = 1538, 3.9%)GOG (n = 5730, 14.3%)COM (n = 8527, 21.3%)P Value*
    TC (mg/dL)188.4 ± 33.5200.4 ± 34.0198.3 ± 33.9201.7 ± 33.9†<.001
    HDL-C (mg/dL)50.3 ± 11.847.0 ± 10.9‡46.4 ± 9.7†45.0 ± 9.4<.001
    TG (mg/dL)131.3 ± 76.6172.8 ± 91.9§165.7 ± 89.7189.2 ± 101.1†‡<.001
    Glucose (mg/dL)99.4 ± 22.6106.4 ± 26.6§102.6 ± 20.8106.2 ± 23.3†<.001
    LDL-C (mg/dL)111.7 ± 30.6118.8 ± 32.7118.7 ± 31.0118.8 ± 32.4<.001
    s-BP (mm Hg)118.8 ± 15.5124.7 ± 16.2125.1 ± 15.6129.1 ± 15.7†‡<.001
    d-BP (mm Hg)74.0 ± 10.978.0 ± 10.778.0 ± 11.380.9 ± 11.3†‡<.001
    • All values are mean ± SD. NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and WC); TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; s-BP, systolic blood pressure; d-BP, diastolic blood pressure.

    • †, ‡, and § are marked in groups with higher values and P < .05 by ANOVA test.

    • * P value by general linear model with age and smoking amount adjustment among groups.

    • † Comparison between GOG and COM.

    • ‡ Comparison between COG and COM.

    • § Comparison between COG and GOG.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Comparison of Metabolic Parameters for NG, COG, GOG, and COM Korean Women

    NG (n = 19,495, 66.0%)COG (n = 2387, 8.1%)GOG (n = 1867, 6.3%)COM (n = 5776, 19.6%)P Value*
    TC (mg/dL)182.5 ± 34.0198.8 ± 37.7†95.2 ± 35.0203.1 ± 37.0‡§<.001
    HDL-C (mg/dL)57.5 ± 12.853.8 ± 12.8§53.6 ± 11.8‡51.3 ± 11.5<.001
    TG (mg/dL)94.0 ± 53.9129.5 ± 77.8†119.0 ± 70.0145.5 ± 82.7‡§<.001
    Glucose (mg/dL)93.4 ± 14.3101.1 ± 26.1†97.2 ± 17.1104.4 ± 26.3‡§<.001
    LDL-C (mg/dL)106.1 ± 29.7119.0 ± 33.7117.7 ± 31.6122.6 ± 33.6‡§<.001
    s-BP (mm Hg)110.7 ± 16.4121.1 ± 19.4120.5 ± 18.3129.1 ± 19.2‡§<.001
    d-BP (mm Hg)70.2 ± 10.174.6 ± 11.174.6 ± 11.279.0 ± 11.4‡§<.001
    • All values are mean ± SD. NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and WC); TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; s-BP, systolic blood pressure; d-BP, diastolic blood pressure.

    • †, ‡, and § are marked in groups with higher values and P < .05 by ANOVA test.

    • * P value by general linear model with age and smoking amount adjustment among groups.

    • † Comparison between COG and GOG.

    • ‡ Comparison between GOG and COM.

    • § Comparison between COG and COM.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Odds Ratios for High FBG and TG in NG, COG, GOG, and COM Groups

    MenWomen
    FBG ≥110 mg/dL,OR (95% CI)TG ≥150 mg/dL,OR (95% CI)P Value*FBG ≥110 mg/dL,OR (95% CI)TG ≥150 mg/dL,OR (95% CI)P Value*
    NG1111
    COG1.82 (1.59–2.09)2.38 (2.13–2.67)<.0011.91 (1.65–2.21)2.01 (1.80–2.25)<.001
    GOG1.74 (1.60–1.89)2.20 (2.06–2.34)<.0011.77 (1.48–2.11)1.96 (1.73–2.22)<.001
    COM2.35 (2.20–2.52)3.26 (3.08–3.44)<.0013.20 (2.89–3.54)3.05 (2.82–3.30)<.001
    • FBG, fasting blood sugar; TG, triglyceride; NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and WC); OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

    • * P < .001, statistically significant difference compared to the NG after age and smoking amount adjustment by the multiple logistic regression model.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Prevalence of Abnormal Metabolic Parameters and Metabolic Syndrome for Men in the NG, COG, GOG, and COM Groups.

    NG (%)COG (%)GOG (%)COM (%)P Value
    Waist (≥90 cm)01000100<.001
    HDL-C (<40 mg/dL)16.723.924.729.5<.001
    TG (≥150 mg/dL)29.751.747.558.3<.001
    FBG (≥110 mg/dL)12.324.018.626.3<.001
    BP (≥130/80 mm Hg)35.652.050.563.4<.001
    MS (%)4.239.19.749.7<.001
    • NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and WC); HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; FBG, fasting blood glucose; BP, blood pressure; MS, metabolic syndrome defined in NCEP-ATP III (Asian guideline). P values were from χ2 test.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Prevalence of Abnormal Metabolic Parameters and Metabolic Syndrome for Women in the NG, COG, GOG, and COM Groups

    NG (%)COG (%)GOG (%)COM (%)P Value
    Waist (≥80 cm)01000100<.001
    HDL-C (<50 mg/dL)2.839.939.548.5<.001
    TG (≥150 mg/dL)11.528.423.137.2<.001
    Glucose (≥110 mg/dL)4.914.39.721.3<.001
    BP (≥130/80 mm Hg)21.442.937.757.9<.001
    MS (%)2.633.07.846.5<.001
    • NG, normal group (normal BMI with normal WC); COG, centrally obese group (normal BMI with high WC); GOG, generally obese group (high BMI with normal WC); COM, combined obese group (high BMI and WC); HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; BP, blood pressure; MS, metabolic syndrome defined in NCEP-ATP III (Asian guideline). P values were from χ2 test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 3
May-June 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Different Waist Circumferences, Different Metabolic Risks in Koreans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Different Waist Circumferences, Different Metabolic Risks in Koreans
Nam Seok Joo, Bom Taeck Kim, Sat Byul Park, Mi Hee Kong, Tae Young Lee, Kwang Min Kim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2007, 20 (3) 258-265; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060064

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Different Waist Circumferences, Different Metabolic Risks in Koreans
Nam Seok Joo, Bom Taeck Kim, Sat Byul Park, Mi Hee Kong, Tae Young Lee, Kwang Min Kim
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2007, 20 (3) 258-265; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060064
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Research Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire