The IRB Challenge for Practice-based Research: Strategies of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN)

References

1. ↵
   American Academy of Family Physicians. National Research Network ( 2006).
2. ↵
   Burman WJ, Reves RR, Cohn DL, Schooley RT. Breaking the camel’s back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 152–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   McWilliams R, Hoover-Fong J, Hamosh A, Beck S, Beaty T, Cutting G. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA 2003; 290: 360–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. Gold JL, Dewa CS. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way? Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 291–307.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Green LA, Lowery JC, Kowalski CP, Wyszewianski L. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research. Health Serv Res 2006; 41: 214–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. Wolf LE, Croughan M, Lo B. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Med Care 2002; 40: 521–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Wolf LE, Waldren JF, Lo B. Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3 Suppl 11: S30–7.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   Graham DG, Pace WD, Kappus JA, et al. Institutional review board approval of practice-based research network patient safety studies. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005 Feb. Publication No. 050021 (3). p. 453–64.
9. ↵
   Christoffel KK, Binns HJ, Stockman JA 3rd, et al. Practice-based research: opportunity and obstacles. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 399–406.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. Dietrich AJ, O’Connor G, Keller A, et al. Will community physicians participate in rigorous studies of cancer control? The methodology and recruitment of a randomized trial of physician practices. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990; 39: 373–81.

    OpenUrl
11. Plane MB, Beasley JW, Wiesen P, McBride P, Underbakke G. Physician attitudes toward research study participation: a focus group. WMJ 1998; 97: 49–51.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. ↵
    Alternative models of IRB review. Washington (DC): The Office for Human Research and Protections, National Institutes of Health, the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Workshop Summary Report; 2005.
13. ↵
    45 CFR § 46 ( 2005).
14. ↵
    45 CFR 164.501, 164.508, 164.512 (i) ( 2003)
15. ↵
    Office for Human Research Protections [homepage on the Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. [updated 18 Oct 2006]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/.
16. ↵
    CITI [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: https://www.citiprogram.org/default.asp.
17. ↵
    Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2: S3–32.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text