Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Will This Exercise Be Good Enough?

Jeevan P. Marasinghe and A. A. Amarasinghe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2007, 20 (1) 98-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060158
Jeevan P. Marasinghe
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. A. Amarasinghe
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: Since Papanicolaou showed that exfoliated cervical cells could be successfully used for identification of pathology of uterine cervix, speculum examination and obtaining a smear became a part and parcel of routine gynecological care.1 Millions of females undergo this procedure due to better health care facilities, organizational commitment, screening programs, and patient awareness.2

The use of water-soluble gel as a lubricant was thought to affect the smear quality by altering the uptake of dye during staining. Evaluation of the quality of the smears so obtained was made by Gilson et al.3 This evaluation had its strengths and weaknesses. The striking positive feature was the involvement of each subject as her own control, when initial smear was performed on all subjects without gel and the second smear was performed with gel in half the patients and without gel in the other half. The procedure therefore allowed better assessment of discomfort level both within the groups as well as between groups while making sure that the patients would not require a second visit in case the gel obscured the cervical cytology. The major drawback of the exercise was the use of fewer patients compared with previous studies.4 Although the smaller sample size was shown to be sufficient enough by post hoc power analysis, this could affect the generalizability of the results to a larger population. The lack of uniformity within the study population was evident in the fact that it was primarily composed of premenopausal females who could produce biased results when inquiring the discomfort level. This could lead to type 11 error and jeopardize the correctness of the conclusions.5

The fact that the patients were kept blinded for the use of lubricant is questionable. It is practically difficult to conceal the use of a 2.7-g pack of lubricant gel from a female study subject! Further clarification is appreciated on the time and place of application of gel. However, the results obtained from this study may well divert our thinking pattern on the use of water-based lubricant during speculum examination for Papanicolaou smears.

Notes

  • Dr. M. Gilson and coauthors were shown this letter and declined to comment.

References

  1. ↵
    Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941; 42: 193–206.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Curtis P, Mintzer M, Resnick J, Morrell D, Hendrix S. The quality of cervical cancer screening: a primary care perspective. Am J Med Qual 1996; 11: 11–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Gilson M, Desai A, Caedoza-Favarato G, Vroman P, Thornton JA. Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening Papanicolaou smear? J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 340–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Amies AM, Miller L, Lee SK, Koutsky L. The effect of vaginal speculum lubrication on the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cytology diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 889–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Heddle N, Cook D, Shannon H, Walter S. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing. CMAJ 1995; 152: 27–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 1
January-February 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Will This Exercise Be Good Enough?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Will This Exercise Be Good Enough?
Jeevan P. Marasinghe, A. A. Amarasinghe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 98-99; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060158

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Will This Exercise Be Good Enough?
Jeevan P. Marasinghe, A. A. Amarasinghe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 98-99; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060158
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire