Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Cancer Risk Assessment: Examining the Family Physician’s Role

Carl V. Tyler and Clint W. Snyder
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2006, 19 (5) 468-477; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468
Carl V. Tyler Jr.
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clint W. Snyder
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Eberl MM, Sunga AY, Farrell CD, Mahoney MC. Patients with a family history of cancer: identification and management. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005; 18: 211–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Sifri R, Gangadharappa S, Acheson L. Identifying and testing for hereditary susceptibility to common cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54: 309–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Medalie JH, Zyzanski SJ, Langa D, Stange KC. The family in family practice: is it a reality? J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 390–6.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Sifri RA, Wender R, Paynter N. Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 856.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hampel H, Sweet K, Westman JA, Offit K, Eng C. Referral for cancer genetics consultation: a review and compilation of risk assessment criteria. J Med Genet 2004; 41: 81–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Reding D, Buys S. Reported family history of cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 792–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Strahm B, Malkin D. Hereditary cancer predisposition in children: genetic basis and clinical implications. Int J Cancer 2006; Epub ahead of print: April 26.
  9. ↵
    Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Zyzanski S, Goodwin MA, Stange KS. Family history-taking in community practice: implications for genetic screening. Genet Med 2000; 2: 180–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Dove-Edwin I, Sasieni P, Adams J, Thomas J. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year prospective, follow-up study. BMJ 2005; 331: 1047. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Gennarelli M, Jandorf L, Cromwell C, Valdimarsdottir H, Redd W, Iskaowitz S. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians. Mt Sinai J Med 2005; 72: 36–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Schrony PC, Barriron AF, Ling BS, Wilson S, Geller AC. Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1031–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Montano DE, Phillips WR. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 795–800.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Tinley ST, Houfek J, Watson P, et al. Screening adherence in BRCA1/2 families is associated with primary physicians’ behavior. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 125: 5–11.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices. Am J Med 2003; 115: 129–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 264–71.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Bampton PA, Sandford JJ, Young GP. Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 155–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Paskett ED, Tatum C, Rushing J, et al. Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triracial rural population. Cancer 2004; 101: 2650–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Hall M, Olopade O. Confronting genetic testing disparities: knowledge is power. JAMA 2005; 293: 1783–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev Med 2005; 41: 23–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA 2005; 293: 1729–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Clayton EW. Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 562–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Gramling R, Nash J, Siren K, Eaten C, Culpepper L. Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 130–2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Severin MJ. Genetic susceptibility for specific cancers: medical liability of the clinician. Cancer 1999; 86: 1744–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    Sweet K, Willis SK, Ashida S, Westman JA. Use of fear-appeal techniques in the design of tailored cancer risk communication messages: implications for healthcare providers. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3375–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Croyle RT, Lerman C. Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 25: 59–66.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 23: 22–30.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Kinney AY, DeVellis BM, Skrzynia C, Millikan R. Genetic testing for colorectal carcinoma susceptibility. Cancer 2001; 91: 57–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    McInerney-Leo A, Biesecker BB, Hadley DW, et al. BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. II: Impact on relationships. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 133: 165–9.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, et al. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med 2003; 25: 187–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review. BMJ 2003; 327: 703–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Tsao AS, Kim ES, Hong WK. Chemoprevention of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54: 150–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 5
September-October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cancer Risk Assessment: Examining the Family Physician’s Role
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cancer Risk Assessment: Examining the Family Physician’s Role
Carl V. Tyler, Clint W. Snyder
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 468-477; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cancer Risk Assessment: Examining the Family Physician’s Role
Carl V. Tyler, Clint W. Snyder
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 468-477; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Randomized Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Screening in Members of High-Risk Families in the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and Cancer Genetics Network
  • Coherence and Completeness of Population-based Family Cancer Reports
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire