Does Gel Affect Cytology or Comfort in the Screening Papanicolaou Smear?

References

1. ↵
   Stenkvist B, Bergstrom R, Eklund G, Fox CH. Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer: what can you expect? JAMA 1984; 252: 1423–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Day NE. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 714–8.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P. Wong’s essentials of pediatric nursing. 6th ed, St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 1301.
4. ↵
   DeCherney A, Nathan L. Current obstetric and gynecologic diagnosis and treatment, The McGraw-Hill Companies: 2003. Available from: http://www.online.statref.com/document.aspx?fxid=30&docid=351 [26 May 2003].
5. ↵
   Degowin R. Degowin’s Diagnostic Examination, The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000. Available from: http://www.online.statref.com/document.aspx?fxid=36&docid=242 [26 May 2003].
6. ↵
   Amies AM, Miller L, Lee SK, Koutsky L. The effect of vaginal speculum lubrication on the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cytology diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(5 Pt 1): 889–92.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   Harer WB, Valenzuela G Jr., Lebo D. Lubrication of the vaginal introitus and speculum does not affect the Papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(5 Pt 1): 887–8.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   Ott L. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 3rd ed. Boston (MA): PWS-Kent Publishing Company; 1988. p. 113.
9. ↵
   Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC. Procedures for primary care physicians. 2 ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby, Inc.; 2003. p. 1153.