Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleSpecial Communication

From Specialty-Based to Practice-Based: A New Blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine Cognitive Examination

Thomas E. Norris, Richard J. Rovinelli, James C. Puffer, Jason Rinaldo and David W. Price
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice November 2005, 18 (6) 546-554; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.6.546
Thomas E. Norris
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Rovinelli
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Puffer
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Rinaldo
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Price
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Conceptual diagram of the application of a content-based blueprint.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Example of use of the blueprint to select a question based on content of practice data.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Old Approach: Specialty-Based ABFM Cognitive Examination Question Distribution

    General Medical DisciplinePercentage of Representation
    Internal medicine36
    Surgery6
    Obstetrics7
    Community medicine9
    Pediatrics13
    Psychiatry7
    Geriatrics12
    Gynecology10
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Definition of Terms

    TermDefinition
    Classical test theoryA theory about test scores, which postulates that a person’s test score can be modeled as the sum of two unobservable variables, a true score and an error score where with certain assumptions a true score can be shown to be the expected score across parallel test forms. A limitation of the classical test theory model is that both person scores and item statistics are dependent on the test and the sample of examinees, respectively.
    Item response theoryA modern statistical theory for test development and scoring that improves the understanding of both individual and item performance. It is based on the concept that both test items and individuals can be simultaneously described in terms of their standing on, or relationship to, one or more ability/knowledge level scales. An individual is characterized by his or her position on the scale, and an item can be characterized by the point on the scale indicating the trait or ability level at which a person would have a 50% chance of responding correctly to the item.
    Examination blueprintA table of specifications based on the knowledge domain of family medicine, which is weighted by a judged frequency of use and clinical importance. It is used to determine the scope and depth of material covered in the examination process.
    EquatingA statistical process by which the score scale on one test is converted to the score scale of another test so that the scores are equivalent or parallel.
    Certifiably competentA description of a candidate who has scored at or above the cut score level on a certification examination.
    Cut scoreA specified point on a score scale at or above which a candidate passes and below which a candidate fails.
    Dimensions/ordersA categorization of the domain of knowledge in family medicine, which serves as an organizing agent for the content blueprint.
    Adaptive testingA sequential form of testing in which the order of items presented is determined by the examinee’s response to previous items.
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Other Dimensions in the Categorization System

    Age dimensionEtiology/origin dimension
        Fetus    Autoimmune/allergic
        Newborn    Behavioral/lifestyle/cognitive
        Infant    Degenerative
        Child    Environmental
        Adolescent    Genetic
        Adult    Iatrogenic
            Young    Idiopathic
            Middle aged    Infectious
        Senior    Neoplastic
            Old    Nutritional
            Very old    Pregnancy
    Sex/gender dimension    Toxicologic
        Male    Traumatic
        Female    Undifferentiated
    Populations dimension    Vascular/ischemic
        Immigrant/refugee    Anatomic/obstructive/surgical
        Ethnicity/race    Normal
        Disabilities        Anatomy
        Gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender        Physiology
        Socioeconomic        Growth and development
        GeneralDiagnosis and management dimension
    Continuum of care dimension    Diagnosis
        Prevention        History
            Primary        Physical
            Secondary        Laboratory
        Emergent        Imaging
        Acute        Diagnostic procedure
        Chronic        Other
            Early    Management
            Advanced        Pharmaceutical
            Procedural/surgical
            Behavioral/psychotherapy
            Complimentary and alternative medicine
            Other
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Frequency of Presenting Problem by Organ System*

    NMeanSDRelative Percentage of Practice
    20042003
    Cardiovascular system8074.280.94316.717.0
    Musculoskeletal system8073.660.89512.213.0
    Respiratory system8073.590.81511.710.8
    Psychogenic (mental health/behavior)8073.460.95310.711.3
    Endocrine system8073.341.0349.88.0
    Gastrointestinal system8073.290.7209.510.4
    Reproductive, female8072.751.0486.15.3
    Integumentary system8072.580.7245.35.5
    Nephrological/urological8072.390.6074.44.7
    Neurological system8072.350.6154.24.0
    Nonspecific8072.200.9353.43.5
    Hematological/immunological8072.140.5213.12.4
    Sensory system8072.090.5482.92.4
    Reproductive, male8072.040.5232.61.7
    Total807100.0100.0
    • * Higher scores indicate higher frequency of exposure to issue.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Population-Based/Health Systems-Based Issues*

    NMeanSD
    Evidence-based practice8072.071.049
    Quality improvement8072.590.884
    Geographic (urban/rural)8072.821.065
    Informatics8073.041.075
    Health policy8073.090.941
    Legal8073.130.893
    Epidemiology8073.270.852
    Biostatistics8073.520.801
    Bioterrorism8073.880.414
    • * Lower scores indicate higher frequency of exposure to issue (1 = daily, 2 = weekly, 3 = monthly, 4 = almost never)

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Patient-Based Care and Systems Issues: Highest to Lowest Strength of Endorsement*

    NMeanSD
    Clinical decision-making8071.090.428
    Communication8071.170.533
    Doctor-patient interactions8071.210.599
    Family issues8071.560.730
    Evidence-based practice8071.800.962
    Cultural issues8072.000.991
    Ethics8072.391.013
    End-of-life care8072.620.868
    Palliative care8072.710.895
    • * Lower scores indicate higher frequency of exposure to issue (1 = daily, 2 = weekly, 3 = monthly, 4 = almost never).

    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Percentage of Practice by Organ System NAMCS (2002) versus ABFM (2003/2004)

    Organ System CategoryNAMCS Annual National FrequencyNAMCS 2002 1st Diagnosis PercentageABFM 2003 and 2004 Survey of Practice Percentage
    Cardiovascular20,749,52510.416.7
    Endocrine17,363,3998.29.8
    Gastrointestinal12,387,7295.19.5
    Hematologic/immune4,625,9602.83.1
    Integumentary15,068,7577.05.3
    Musculoskeletal31,860,95513.912.2
    Nephrologic/urologic4,680,8602.14.4
    Neurologic3,341,2772.04.2
    Psychogenic/behavioral8,140,4064.410.7
    Reproductive, female6,291,8313.46.1
    Reproductive, male1,537,1560.62.6
    Respiratory36,844,80816.911.7
    Special sensory8,221,4331.12.9
    Nonspecific35,958,36416.9*3.4*
    Not applicable to ABFM’s content blueprint1,348,8200.8
    Total208,421,280100.0
    Correspondence between NAMCS and ABFM survey of practicer = 0.78*
    • * The nonspecific category was not included in the correlation between NAMCS and ABFM percentages.

    • View popup
    Table 8.

    Percentage of Examination Items per Organ System, Based on 90% of the Examination Being Composed of Organ System Categories

    DomainNAMCSABFM Survey AveragesNAMCS/ABFM Averages90% of Average
    Cardiovascular10.416.713.5512.36
    Endocrine8.29.89.008.21
    Gastrointestinal5.19.57.306.66
    Hematologic/immune2.83.12.952.69
    Integumentary75.36.155.61
    Musculoskeletal13.912.213.0511.90
    Nephrologic/urologic2.14.43.252.96
    Neurologic24.23.102.83
    Nonspecific16.93.410.159.26
    Psychogenic/behavioral4.410.77.556.88
    Reproductive, female3.46.14.754.33
    Reproductive, male0.62.61.601.46
    Respiratory16.911.714.3013.04
    Special sensory1.12.92.001.82
    98.7090.00
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 18 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 18, Issue 6
November-December 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
From Specialty-Based to Practice-Based: A New Blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine Cognitive Examination
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
From Specialty-Based to Practice-Based: A New Blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine Cognitive Examination
Thomas E. Norris, Richard J. Rovinelli, James C. Puffer, Jason Rinaldo, David W. Price
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Nov 2005, 18 (6) 546-554; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.546

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
From Specialty-Based to Practice-Based: A New Blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine Cognitive Examination
Thomas E. Norris, Richard J. Rovinelli, James C. Puffer, Jason Rinaldo, David W. Price
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Nov 2005, 18 (6) 546-554; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.546
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • The Development Process
    • The New Examination Content Blueprint
    • The Dimensions/Orders System
    • A. Organ Systems (90% of examination questions)
    • B. Population-Based Care and Health Systems (5% of examination questions)
    • C. Patient-Based Care and Systems (5% of examination questions)
    • Weighting
    • Complexity or Depth of Knowledge
    • Implementation
    • Future Directions
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Examining the Construct Stability of the Family Medicine Certification Scale Between One-Day Exam and Longitudinal Assessment
  • The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning
  • Using the Family Medicine Certification Longitudinal Assessment to Make Summative Decisions
  • Validating the Test Plan Specifications for the American Board of Family Medicine's Certification Examination
  • CREATING A NEW BLUEPRINT FOR ABFM EXAMINATIONS
  • Frequency and Criticality of Diagnoses in Family Medicine Practices: From the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS)
  • Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores
  • Family Physicians' Scope of Practice and American Board of Family Medicine Recertification Examination Performance
  • Pass Rates on the American Board of Family Medicine Certification Exam by Residency Location and Size
  • Performance on the American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination by Country of Medical Training
  • Response: Re: American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Launches New Exam Prep iPhone Application
  • Performance on the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Certification Examination: Are Superior Test-Taking Skills Alone Sufficient to Pass?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In Defense of Generalists: Primary Care Observations Have Systematic Advantages
  • Looking Back to Move Forward: Reflections of PBRN Directors
  • Building a Primary Care Research Agenda for Latino Populations in the Setting of the Latino Paradox: A Report from the 2023 Latino Primary Care Summit
Show more Special Communication

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire