Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Comparison of Demographic Characteristics among White, African American, and Asian American Women
Characteristics White Women% (N) African American Women% (N) Asian American Women% (N) Employment Status Outside of home 39 (276) 58 (38) 41 (45) Homemaker 33 (234) 30 (20) 13 (14) Homemaker and childcare 12 (86) 8 (5) 43 (48) Other 15 (105) 5 (3) 4 (4) Missing data 0.5 (3) Education ≤Some high school 7 (47) 11 (7) 21 (23) Completed high school 30 (208) 36 (24) 41 (37) Some college 40 (281) 30 (20) 29 (32) ≥College degree 23 (164) 23 (15) 14 (15) Missing data 1 (4) Relationship Married 86 (603) 86 (56) 83 (92) Widowed 6 (42) 3 (2) 15 (17) Living together 3 (18) 1 (1) Single/never married 2 (17) 2 (1) 1 (1) Single/divorced 2 (14) 2 (1) Other 1 (10) 8 (5) Missing data 2 (1) Income ≤$25,000 34 (239) 35 (23) 41 (45) >$25,000 to $40,000 33 (233) 41 (27) 36 (40) >$40,000 to $55,000 17 (116) 14 (9) 12 (13) >$55,000 to $70,000 8 (59) 3 (2) 2 (2) ≥$70,000 5 (34) 2 (1) 2 (2) Missing 3 (23) 6 (4) 8 (9) Religious Conviction Very strong 18 (124) 8 (5) 21 (23) Strong 19 (130) 16 (10) 12 (13) Somewhat strong 25 (175) 23 (14) 20 (22) Not strong 21 (148) 23 (14) 22 (24) None/absent 18 (122) 31 (19) 24 (27) Missing data 1 (5) 6 (4) 2 (2) Mean age (years) 46 39 48 - Table 2.
Prevalence and Comparison of Sexual Concerns among African American, Asian American, and White Women
Sexual Concerns White Women N = 704 % African American Women N = 66 % (POR) Asian Women N = 111 % (POR) Lack of interest in sex 89 84 (0.52)* 72 (0.56)† Difficulty having orgasm 87 79 (0.61)* 72 (0.42)‡ Vaginal lubrication 76 63 (0.45)† 74 (0.82) Lack sex appeal 72 62 (0.69) 47 (0.39)‡ Dyspareunia 72 77 (0.86) 69 (0.91) Unsatisfied sexual needs 69 73 (1.13) 54 (0.45)‡ Need sex information 65 70 9 (1.25) 55 (0.62)* Desires different than partners 62 53 (0.77) 51 (0.75) Contraception, family planning, fertility 62 73 (1.51) 48 (0.64)* Inability to have orgasm 61 60 (0.69) 61 (0.52)† HIV/AIDS 52 76 (3.54)§ 54 (1.57)† Safe sex/sexually transmitted diseases 52 68 (3.79)§ 51 (1.67)† Partner sexual difficulties 49 41 (0.89) 41 (0.58)† Difficulty inserting penis 48 44 (1.11) 56 (1.46)* Thinking too much about sex 39 44 (1.88)† 37 (0.94) Adult sexual coercion 36 46 (1.92)† 21 (0.72) Adult emotional/physical abuse 36 32 (1.06) 22 (0.43)† Childhood emotional/physical abuse 34 36 (1.02) 19 (0.47)† Want to have/have had an affair 34 52 (2.41)† 21 (0.80) Sexual aversion 33 32 (1.49) 34 (1.78)* Hard to control sexual urges 30 32 (1.39) 25 (1.09) Sexual orientation 25 28 (1.54) 29 (1.71) Sexual interest in women 20 23 (1.53) 20 (0.87) Childhood sexual coercion 17 20 (1.27) 12 (0.61) Wish to be opposite sex 16 14 (1.90) 15 (1.09) Sexually abusive towards others 15 4 (5.44) 8 (9.76)* Kruskal Wallis test χ2 = 0.412, df = 2, P = .814 to compare relative rank of sexual concerns among the 3 racial/ethnic groups. POR, Prevalence odds ratio after controlling for demographic variables age, marital status, religion, income, and education:
* 0.1 ≤P≤.05,
† P ≤ .05,
‡ P ≤ .01,
§ P ≤.001, of African American and Asian American compared with White women.
- Table 3.
Predictors of High Number of Sexual Concerns among White, African American, and Asian American Women with Sexual Coercion in Logistic Equation*
Characteristic Overall OR (95% CI) White OR (95% CI) African American OR (95% CI) Asian American OR (95% CI) Sexual Coercion No 1 1 1 1 Yes 5.3 (3, 8, 7.4) 5.7 (4.0, 8.2) 8.9 (1.2, 66.4) 5.9 (1.5, 23.0) Age ≤45 years 1 1 >45 years 0.7 (0.5, 0.99) 0.01 (0.0, 0.5) Income ≤$25,000 1 1 $25,000 to ≤40,000 0.6 (0.4, 0.96) 0.05 (0.004, 0.5) >$40,000 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) Education ≤High school 1 1 1 Some college 1.9 (1.3, 2.8) 1.7 (1.1, 2.7) 6.6 (1.6, 27.3) ≥College 2.1 (1.3, 3.3) 1.7 (1.0, 2, 8) 25.6 (3.2, 201, 865) * The referent groups for demographic characteristics were: age ≤ 45; income ≤ $25,000; education ≤ high school, religion = none/absent; relationship = not married; and, for the analysis of the overall cohort, race = white. “No history” of sexual coercion was referent group for this concern. Only statistically significant predictors are included in the table.
- Table 4.
Predictors of High Number of Sexual Concerns among White, African American, and Asian American Women with Physical/Emotion Abuse in Logistic Analysis*
Characteristic Overall OR (95% CI) Caucasian OR (95% CI) African American OR (95% CI) Asian American OR (95% CI) Physical/Emotional Abuse No 1 1 Yes 2.4 (1.7, 3.2) 2.5 (1.8, 3.5) Age ≤45 years 1 1 >45 years 0.7 (0.5, 0.9) 0.06 (0.003, 1.0) Income ≤$25,000 1 1 $25,000 to ≤40,000 0.6 (0.4, 0.8) 0.06 (0.007, 0.5) >$40,000 0.6 (0.4, 0.9) Education ≤High school 1 1 1 Some college 1.7 (1.2, 2.5) 1.5 (1.05, 2.4) 6.7 (1.6, 28.2) ≥College 1.9 (1.9, 2.9) 20.3 (2.5, 166.1) * The referent groups for demographic characteristics were: age ≤ 45; income ≤ $25,000; education ≤ high school, religion = none/absent; relationship = not married; and, for the analysis of the overall cohort, race = white. “No history” of physical/emotional abuse was the referent group for this concern. Only statistically significant predictors are included in the table.