Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherSTEPped Care: An Evidence-Based Approach to Drug Therapy

Treatment of Uncomplicated Hypertension: Are ACE Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers as Effective as Diuretics and β-Blockers?

Joseph J. Saseen, Eric J. MacLaughlin and John M. Westfall
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice March 2003, 16 (2) 156-164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.2.156-a
Joseph J. Saseen
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. MacLaughlin
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Westfall
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Blood Pressure Lowering in Large-scale Clinical Trials Comparing Newer with Older Antihypertensive Agents.

    Clinical TrialTreatment GroupsMean Baseline BP (mm Hg)Mean BP Reduction (mm Hg)Persistence (% on Randomized Drug at End of Study)Tolerability (% Withdrawn Because of Adverse Effects)
    CAPPP9,15Captopril (n = 5,492)161.8/99.811/8*Not reportedNot reported
    Diuretics/β-blockers (n = 5,493)159.6 /98.1
    STOP-210Felodipine/Isradipine (n =2,196)34.5 /17.5*66.2Not reported
    Enalapril/Lisinopril (n = 2,205)194/98*34.5 /16.2*61.3Not reported
    Diuretics/β-blockers (n = 2,213)34.8/16.6*62.3Not reported
    INSIGHT11Nifedipine (n =3,157)173/99*35/17*69.023.0
    Hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride(n = 3,164)72.016.4
    NORDIL12Diltiazem (n = 5,410)173.5/105.820.3 /18.7†77.0Not reported
    Diuretics/β-blockers (n = 5,471)173.4 /105.723.3/18.7†93.0Not reported
    • BP = blood pressure.

    • * No difference between groups (P > .05).

    • † Difference between groups in systolic reduction (P < .001).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Clinical Trials Evaluating Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Compared with Diuretic or β-Blocker.

    Study EndpointsCAPPP9 RR (95% CI)*STOP-210 RR (95% CI)*
    Combined primary endpoint
     Fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, or other cardiovascular deaths1.05 (0.90–1.22)
     Fatal myocardial infarction, fatal stroke, or other fatal cardiovascular disease1.01 (0.84–1.22)
    Other endpoints
     Fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction0.96 (0.77–1.19)0.90 (0.72–1.13)
     Fatal and nonfatal stroke1.25†(1.01–1.55)0.90 (0.74–1.08)
     All major cardiovascular events0.94 (0.83–1.06)0.94 (0.82–1.07)
     Cardiovascular mortality0.77 (0.57–1.04)1.01 (0.84–1.22)
     Total morbidity0.93 (0.76–1.14)1.02 (0.89–1.18)
    • RR = relative risk, CI = confidence interval.

    • * Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor compared with diuretic or β-blocker.

    • † P = .044.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Clinical Trials Evaluating Calcium Channel Blockers Compared with Diuretic or β-Blocker.

    Study EndpointsSTOP-210 RR (95% CI)*INSIGHT11 RR (95% CI)*NORDIL12 RR (95% CI)*
    Combined primary endpoint
     Fatal myocardial infarction, fatal stroke, or other fatal cardiovascular disease0.97 (0.80–1.17)
     Death from any cardiovascular or cerebrovascular cause; or nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure1.10 (0.91–1.34)
     Fatal and nonfatal stroke, fatal and nonfatal stroke myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular death1.00 (0.87–1.15)
    Other endpoints
     Myocardial infarctionFatal and nonfatal: 1.18 (0.95–1.47)Fatal: 3.22† (1.18–8.80) Nonfatal: 1.09 (0.76–1.58)Fatal: 1.10 (0.64–1.88) Fatal and nonfatal: 1.16 (0.94–1.44)
     StrokeFatal and nonfatal: 0.88 (0.73–1.06)Fatal: 1.09 (0.48–2.48) Nonfatal: 0.87 (0.61–1.26)Fatal: 0.96 (0.52–1.74) Fatal and nonfatal: 0.8 (0.65–0.99)
     All major cardiovascular events0.99 (0.87–1.12)1.11 (0.90–1.36)1.04 (0.91–1.18)
     Cardiovascular mortality0.97 (0.80–1.17)1.16 (0.80–1.69)1.11 (0.87–1.43)
     Total mortality0.99 (0.86–1.15)1.01 (0.80–1.27)1.00 (0.83–1.20)
    • RR = relative risk, CI = confidence interval.

    • * Calcium channel blocker compared with diuretic or β-blocker.

    • † P = .017.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Monthly Cost of Selected Antihypertensive Agents.

    DrugUsual DoseCost per Month* ($)
    Hydrochlorothiazide (generic)25 mg qd2.40
    Atenolol (generic)50 mg qd2.40
    Metoprolol tartrate (generic)50 mg bid9.56
    Captopril (generic)25 mg bid8.42
    Enalapril maleate (generic)10 mg qd17.67
    Lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril)†10 mg qd27.94
    Nifedipine CR (generic)60 mg qd27.25
    Diltiazem CD (generic)180 mg qd23.42
    Verapamil CR tablet (generic)180 mg qd7.00
    Amlodipine (Norvasc)5 mg qd39.82
    • Note: qd = every day, bid − twice a day.

    • * From drugstore.com (available at: http://www.drugstore.com). Calculated based on a 90- to 100-tablet purchase.

    • † Generic lisinopril (Prinivil only) approved, but not yet available.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 16 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 16, Issue 2
1 Mar 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment of Uncomplicated Hypertension: Are ACE Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers as Effective as Diuretics and β-Blockers?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Treatment of Uncomplicated Hypertension: Are ACE Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers as Effective as Diuretics and β-Blockers?
Joseph J. Saseen, Eric J. MacLaughlin, John M. Westfall
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 2003, 16 (2) 156-164; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.2.156-a

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Treatment of Uncomplicated Hypertension: Are ACE Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers as Effective as Diuretics and β-Blockers?
Joseph J. Saseen, Eric J. MacLaughlin, John M. Westfall
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 2003, 16 (2) 156-164; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.2.156-a
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods
    • Safety and Tolerability
    • Effectiveness
    • Price
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor's Note
  • Onychomycosis: Improved Cure Rates with Itraconazole and Terbinafine
Show more STEPped Care: An Evidence-Based Approach to Drug Therapy

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire