ORIGINAL RESEARCH
R. Lynae Roberts; Desh P. Mohan; Katelin D. Cherry; Samantha Sanky; Taylor R. Huffman; Christina Lukasko; Anthony Comito; Dara Hashemi; Zachary K. Menn; Tatiana Y. Fofanova; Julia D. Andrieni
Corresponding Author: R. Lynae Roberts, PhD; Koda Health
Email: rlroberts918@gmail.com
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230133R2
Keywords: Accountable Care Organization, Advance Care Planning, Aging, Health Equity, Retrospective Studies
Dates: Submitted: 04-04-2023; Revised: 06-26-2023; 07-06-2023; Accepted: 07-18-2023
AHEAD OF PRINT: |HTML| |PDF| FINAL PUBLICATION: |HTML| |PDF|
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP), a process of sharing one’s values and preferences for future medical treatments, can improve quality of life, reduce loved ones’ anxiety, and decrease unwanted medical utilization and costs. Despite benefits to patients and healthcare systems, ACP uptake often remains low, due partially to lack of knowledge and difficulty initiating discussions. Digital tools may help reduce these barriers to entry.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined data from pilot deployment of Koda Health patient-facing ACP among Houston Methodist Coordinated Care patients, for quality improvement (QI) purposes. Patients referred by nurse navigators could access Koda’s digital platform, complete ACP, and share the legal documentation generated. Analyzed measures include usage rates and ACP-related decisions within the platform.
RESULTS: Of eligible patients (n=203), 52.7% voluntarily completed their plan. Engagement and completion rates were similar across demographics. Patients indicated majority preference (66.4%) toward spending the last days of life at home. Most patients indicated wanting no life-support intervention if quality of life became unacceptable (51-71% across four treatments). Life-support decisions were similar between demographic categories, excepting CPR and dialysis, wherein a greater portion of Black patients than White patients preferred at least trial intervention, rather than none.
CONCLUSIONS: As an observational QI analysis, limitations include bounded geographical reach and lack of data on ACP impacts to subsequent healthcare utilization, which future studies will address. Findings suggest that digital health tools like Koda can effectively facilitate equitable ACP access and may help support health systems and providers in offering comprehensive ACP.