Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
  • Log out
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleResearch Letter

Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Ambulatory-Care-Sensitive Condition Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults

Arch G. Mainous, Lu Yin, James F. Medley, Aaron A. Saguil and Frank A. Orlando
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2024, 37 (4) 792-795; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230386R1
Arch G. Mainous III
From the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM, LY, JFM, AAS, FAO), Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu Yin
From the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM, LY, JFM, AAS, FAO), Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James F. Medley
From the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM, LY, JFM, AAS, FAO), Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron A. Saguil
From the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM, LY, JFM, AAS, FAO), Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank A. Orlando
From the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM, LY, JFM, AAS, FAO), Department of Health Services Research Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (AGM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic social distancing requirements encouraged patients to avoid public spaces including in-office health care visits. Ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) represent conditions that can be managed with quality primary care and when access is limited, these conditions can lead to avoidable emergency department (ED) visits.

Methods: Using national data on ED visits from 2019 to 2021 in the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey, we examined the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ACSC ED visits among older adults (aged ≥65).

Results: The proportion of ED visits among older adults that were for ACSCs increased between 2019 (17.4%) and 2021 (18.5%). The trend in both rural (26.4%–28.6%) and urban areas (15.4%–16.8%) shows a significant jump from 2019 to 2021 (P < .001).

Conclusions: This rise in ACSC ED use is consistent with a delay in normal primary care during the pandemic.

  • Access to Care
  • Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions
  • COVID-19
  • Emergency Departments
  • Pandemics
  • Primary Health Care

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, associated lockdowns, and social distancing requirements encouraged patients to stay away from public spaces including in-office health care visits. Many older adults with comorbid medical conditions worried about exposure to the COVID-19 and chose to delay normal episodes of health care.1 Ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) represent disease entities like congestive heart failure and diabetes that can be managed with quality primary care access.2 When access is limited or curtailed, these conditions can worsen and lead to avoidable emergency department (ED) visits. For patients with decreased access to care before the COVID-19 pandemic, like those in rural areas, the impact of pandemic-related changes in primary care access on ACSCs may have been compounded. One study showed ACSC hospitalizations decreased in the first year of the pandemic (March 2020–February 2021).3 It is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns, or fear of social interaction had a negative effect on ACSC ED visits, particularly after the initial disruption of care. Our objective was to examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on downstream ACSC ED visits among older adults (aged ≥65).

Methods

We conducted a natural experiment using data from the 2019, 2020 and 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a national probability sample survey of visits to the emergency department. We are able to make US population estimates by accounting for the visit weights and the design effect. The design was based on the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic. The year 2019 provides a baseline before the lockdown, 2020 represents the implementation of the lockdown and possible decrease in accessing primary care, and 2021 is utilization of the ED post deferral of care. Older adults (≥65 years) were included (unweighted sample of n = 1,067 reflecting an estimated 140,575,952 ED visits in the US population). Our primary measures were visits related to chronic ACSCs (hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma). We use ICD-10-CM Diagnosis code(J44,J45,I10,I50,E08,E09,E10,E11,E12,E13) for those diseases/conditions. We were testing to see if emergency department use for ACSCs differs before and after COVID. We also evaluated the impact in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) (urban) and non-MSAs (rural) since there are fewer primary care physicians in rural areas. We conducted Chi-Square analyses comparing years. We used RStudio with R version 4.3.1 (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) for the analyses.

Results

The results indicated that the proportion of ED visits among older adults that were for ACSCs declined in 2020 but showed a substantial increase in 2021 (Figure 1) (p = 0.005). Earlier data (2015 was 17.6% and 2018 was 17.8%) shows relative consistency with 2019 data suggesting that the rise was in 2021. Comparing 2019 to 2021, the proportion of ACSC related visits that resulted in hospitalization rose from 39.0% to 41.7% (P = .003). The change over time in ACSC related ED visits in both rural (from 26.4% to 28.6%) and urban areas (from15.4% to16.8%) (Figure 2) shows a significant jump from 2019 to 2021 (P < .001).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Proportion of emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive visits among older adults from 2019 to 2021, United States.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Proportion of emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive visits among older adults from 2019 to 2021 in rural and urban area, United States.

Discussion

This study found that the proportion of ED visits for ACSCs increased substantially among older patients after an initial decrease during the first year of pandemic-related lockdown. Our data also showed a rise in the ACSC associated ED visits that resulted in hospitalizations. This suggests that the impact of the lockdowns and corresponding disruption of care has a lag before seeing the increase in ACSC utilization. Avoiding primary care during the height of the pandemic parallels the expectation that the lack of access for ACSCs would lead to downstream increased ED visits.4

Although COVID-19 was still prevalent in 2021 the current data showed an impact on ACSCs and emergency department use. This trend was inflated in rural areas where patients already have reduced access to primary care. Rural ED visits for ACSCs were particularly high in 2021. This finding reinforces the problem of the maldistribution of physicians in the US with a lack of access in rural areas leading to worse outcomes for those vulnerable patients.5 Certainly, this trend warrants further exploration to identify actionable characteristics of primary care access to build a more robust health care system in light of potential future COVID-19 surges or other natural emergencies.

While our study has provided valuable insights into the changes over time, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations associated with the granularity of our data. The observed “lag” in care may be influenced by various factors, including patients' willingness to return to using the ED and the potential escalation of health care needs.

This study is limited by focusing on visits as the unit of analysis and not patients. We therefore do not have an understanding of the health care utilization of these patients before COVID-19 or of those who chose not to seek care. The COVID-19 policies and concerns decreased access to care with negative consequences. Improved primary care access during pandemics and other national health emergencies needs to be a priority. We understand that various factors beyond the scope of our analysis could influence the observed trends in ACSC-related ED visits. These may include individual-level factors such as socioeconomic status, individual health behaviors, and preexisting health conditions, as well as community-level factors such as regional health care infrastructure and public health policies. By acknowledging the limitations of our study design and the potential influence of unmeasured confounders, we aim to provide a more nuanced interpretation of our findings.

For patients with decreased access to care before the COVID-19 pandemic, like those in rural areas, the impact of pandemic-related changes in primary care access on ACSCs may have been compounded. Our results will contribute to a more robust understanding of the complexities surrounding the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, and ED visits for ACSCs among older adults.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/37/4/792.full.

  • Received for publication October 23, 2023.
  • Revision received December 19, 2023.
  • Accepted for publication January 2, 2024.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhong S,
    2. Huisingh-Scheetz M,
    3. Huang ES
    . Delayed medical care and its perceived health impact among US older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. J American Geriatrics Society 2022;70:1620–8.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    AHRQ quality indicators—guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001. AHRQ Pub. No. 02-R0203.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Becker NV,
    2. Karmakar M,
    3. Tipirneni R,
    4. Ayanian JZ
    . Trends in hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e222933.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tu K,
    2. Sarkadi Kristiansson R,
    3. Gronsbell J
    , INTRePIDet al. Changes in primary care visits arising from the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative study by the International Consortium of Primary Care Big Data Researchers (INTRePID). BMJ Open 2022;12:e059130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Jaret P
    . Attracting the next generation of physicians to rural medicine. AAMC News. Association of American Medical Colleges. Accessed September 6, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 4
July-August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Ambulatory-Care-Sensitive Condition Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Ambulatory-Care-Sensitive Condition Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults
Arch G. Mainous, Lu Yin, James F. Medley, Aaron A. Saguil, Frank A. Orlando
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 37 (4) 792-795; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230386R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Ambulatory-Care-Sensitive Condition Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults
Arch G. Mainous, Lu Yin, James F. Medley, Aaron A. Saguil, Frank A. Orlando
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 37 (4) 792-795; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230386R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Artificial Intelligence and Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing of Certification Stage Completion Associated with Subsequent Certification Exam Outcomes Among Board-Certified Family Physicians
  • Interpersonal Continuity of Care May Help Delay Progression to Type 2 Diabetes
  • Impact of Point of Care Hemoglobin A1c Testing on Time to Therapeutic Intervention
Show more Research Letter

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Access to Care
  • Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions
  • COVID-19
  • Emergency Departments
  • Pandemics
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire