Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
  • Log out
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
AbstractArticle

Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?

P A Nutting, M Baier, J J Werner, G Cutter, C Conry and L Stewart
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice September 2001, 14 (5) 352-361;
P A Nutting
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Baier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J J Werner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Cutter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Conry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND The multiple competing demands of the busy office visit have been shown to interfere with delivery of preventive services. In this study we used physician recommendations for screening mammography to examine the relative importance of physician, patient, and visit characteristics in determining on which patient visits this preventive service will be provided.

METHODS Physicians in the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN) completed a questionnaire describing their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about screening mammography. They also described the content of a series of nonacute care visits with women aged 40 to 75 years with regard to making a recommendation when the patient was due for screening mammography. The data were linked, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods were used to examine the relative importance of physician, patient, and visit characteristics on making a recommendation for mammography.

RESULTS Ninety-three physicians reported making a recommendation for screening mammography on 53.1% of nonacute visits. When modeling physician, patient, and visit characteristics separately, 70% of the variability in the model is explained by physician characteristics only, 63% by patient characteristics only, and 73% by visit characteristics only. A combined model using all characteristics explained 85% of the variability.

CONCLUSIONS Although characteristics of physicians and patients can predict frequency of recommendations for mammography, the specific characteristics of the visit are equally important. Efforts to improve delivery of preventive services in primary care that emphasize physician education and performance feedback are unlikely to increase rates of mammography recommendation. Effective strategies must consider the multiple competing demands faced by patients and physicians during each office visit and seek ways for assisting them in setting rational priorities for services.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 14 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 14, Issue 5
1 Sep 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?
P A Nutting, M Baier, J J Werner, G Cutter, C Conry, L Stewart
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2001, 14 (5) 352-361;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?
P A Nutting, M Baier, J J Werner, G Cutter, C Conry, L Stewart
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2001, 14 (5) 352-361;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effective Hearing Loss Screening in Primary Care: The Early Auditory Referral-Primary Care Study
  • Prompting Primary Care Providers about Increased Patient Risk As a Result of Family History: Does It Work?
  • The Association of Type and Number of Chronic Diseases with Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Does Diabetes Care Differ by Type of Chronic Comorbidity?: An evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework
  • Pratiques medicales de depistage du cancer du sein chez les femmes de 35 a 49 ans et 70 ans et plus
  • Breast cancer screening practices for women aged 35 to 49 and 70 and older
  • Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
  • Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the Primary Care Setting: A Practice-Based Research Network Study
  • Encounters by Patients With Type 2 Diabetes--Complex and Demanding: An Observational Study
  • Physician Recommendation for Papanicolaou Testing Among U.S. Women, 2000
  • Obesity trial: knowledge without systems
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Role of PhDs in Family Medicine Research
  • Past Is Prologue: The Essential Role of Advocacy in Shaping the Future of Family Medicine Research
  • Why I’m Glad I Quit My (First) PhD
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire