Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube

Comparison of Hospital Readmission Rates for Patients Receiving In-Person vs. Telemedicine Discharge Follow-Up Care

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Areeba Zain, MD, MPH; Derek Baughman, MD; Abdul Waheed, MD, MS

Corresponding Author: Areeba Zain, MD, MPH; Family Medicine Residency Program - WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital

Email: ebazain@gmail.com

DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230213R1

Keywords: Chi-Square Test, Continuity of Care, Health Policy, Hospital Medicine, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Primary Health Care, Telemedicine, Transition of Care

Dates: Submitted: 06-01-2023; Revised: 09-29-2023; Accepted: 10-09-2023

FINAL PUBLICATION: |HTML| |PDF|


INTRODUCTION: Unplanned readmissions can be avoided by standardizing and improving the coordination of care after discharge. Telemedicine has been increasingly utilized; however the quality of this care has not been well studied. Standardized measures can provide an objective comparison of care quality. The purpose of our study was to compare quality performance transitions of care management in the office vs telemedicine.

METHODS: The Epic SlicerDicer tool was used to compare the percentage of encounters that were completed via telemedicine (video visits), or via in-person for comparison, Chi-squared tests were used.

RESULTS: A total of 13,891 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study time frame. There were 12,846 patients in the office and 1,048 in the Telemedicine cohort. The office readmission rate was 11.9% with 1,533 patients out of 12,846 compared to Telemedicine with the rate of readmission at 12.1% with 126 patients out of 1,045 patients. The P-value for the Chi-square test between the pre-pandemic and study time frame was 0.15 and 0.95 respectively. Demographic comparability was seen.

DISCUSSION: Our study found a comparable readmission rate between patients seen via in-office and telemedicine for TCM encounters. The findings of this study support the growing body of evidence that telemedicine augments quality performance while reducing cost and improving access without negatively impacting HEDIS performance in healthcare systems.

CONCLUSION: Telemedicine poses little threat of negatively impacting HEDIS performance and might be as effective as traditional office care transitions of care management.

ABSTRACTS IN PRESS

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire