Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleSpecial Communications

The Law of Diminishing Returns in Clinical Medicine: How Much Risk Reduction is Enough?

James W. Mold, Robert M. Hamm and Laine H. McCarthy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 371-375; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090178
James W. Mold
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Hamm
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laine H. McCarthy
MLIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The law of diminishing returns, first described by economists to explain why, beyond a certain point, additional inputs produce smaller and smaller outputs, offers insight into many situations encountered in clinical medicine. For example, when the risk of an adverse event can be reduced in several different ways, the impact of each intervention can generally be shown mathematically to be reduced by the previous ones. The diminishing value of successive interventions is further reduced by adverse consequences (eg, drug-drug, drug-disease, and drug-nutrient interactions), as well as by the total expenditures of time, energy, and resources, which increase with each additional intervention. It is therefore important to try to prioritize interventions based on patient-centered goals and the relative impact and acceptability of the interventions. We believe that this has implications for clinical practice, research, and policy.

  • Risk Reduction
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May-June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Law of Diminishing Returns in Clinical Medicine: How Much Risk Reduction is Enough?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Law of Diminishing Returns in Clinical Medicine: How Much Risk Reduction is Enough?
James W. Mold, Robert M. Hamm, Laine H. McCarthy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 371-375; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Law of Diminishing Returns in Clinical Medicine: How Much Risk Reduction is Enough?
James W. Mold, Robert M. Hamm, Laine H. McCarthy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 371-375; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090178
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case
    • Risk Reduction
    • Prioritization
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Goal-Oriented Prevention: How to Fit a Square Peg into a Round Hole
  • Goal-Oriented Prevention: How to Fit a Square Peg into a Round Hole
  • Failure of the Problem-Oriented Medical Paradigm and a Person-Centered Alternative
  • Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis
  • A cardiovascular disease policy model: part 2--preparing for economic evaluation and to assess health inequalities
  • Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms
  • The Changing Face of Chronic Illness Management in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Underlying Influences and Unintended Outcomes
  • The Complexity of Family Medicine Care
  • Policy and Financing in Family Medicine and the Medical Home
  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Community and Clinical Data to Assess Patient Risks with A Population Health Assessment Engine (PHATE)
  • Primary Care Is an Essential Ingredient to a Successful Population Health Improvement Strategy
  • Does My Patient with Multiple Comorbidities Have Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, and Does It Matter?
Show more Special Communications

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire