Abstract
Joint pain is a common problem seen by family physicians. Although many pain complaints arise from self-limited conditions, a substantial number require immediate and ongoing care. Prompt appropriate treatment can help limit symptoms, prevent disability, and improve outcomes. The differential diagnosis is varied, with both laboratory studies and diagnostic imaging available to help evaluate the joint. At the initial evaluation and at each subsequent re-evaluation, there should be efforts to identify dangerous conditions and distinguish conditions with a disease-specific pathogenesis. Treatment of joint pain consists of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities. Pharmacologic therapies may include medications specific for pain, inflammation, and adjuncts specific to the diagnosis. Treatment of pain should proceed in a step-wise fashion providing medications appropriate for treating the level of pain. Inflammation is treated with physical modalities and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Nonpharmacologic therapies may include protection, rest, ice, compression, elevation, and simple office procedures. Physical therapy and education can assist in the recovery process, and prevent recurrence.
Joint pain is a common complaint presented by patients to family physicians. Each year there are more than 315 million office visits for musculoskeletal complaints.1 By some estimates, these account for more than 10% of all outpatient visits in general medical practice.2 In 2001, a telephone survey completed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed arthritis and chronic joint symptoms in a third of all adults.3 Because joint complaints encompass many diagnoses, an appropriate history and physical examination are necessary to determine the cause. It is important to differentiate acute from chronic joint pain, because many treatments have a different short-term risk/benefit ratio compared with the long term. Treatment consists of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities.
Differential Diagnosis and Definitions
Acute joint pain is any arthralgia that is expected to resolve within 6 weeks (some authors report 6 months); chronic joint pain persists beyond this defined window. In acute joint pain, there is often an unmistakable cause such as trauma or infection. It is important to keep in mind that acute joint pain may also represent a flare of a chronic condition or be the initial presentation of an undiagnosed chronic condition, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid disease, or crystal-induced arthropathy. Acute joint pain may develop into chronic joint pain. Of the 1 million ankle injuries treated in the United States annually, an estimated 40% will produce recurrent symptoms.4
Whether acute or chronic, the goals in treating a joint complaint remain the same: (1) reduce pain, (2) reduce inflammation, (3) facilitate healing, (4) preserve function, and (5) reverse or slow the disease process. At the initial evaluation of the patient and at each subsequent re-evaluation, there should be an effort to identify dangerous conditions and to distinguish conditions with a disease-specific therapy or that may benefit from early referral.
The differential diagnosis of joint pain may be divided into the general categories of trauma, infection, crystal-induced arthropathy, degenerative joint disease, malignancy, rheumatic, and other (Table 1).
Differential Diagnosis of Joint Pain
Prevalence and Natural History
Joint pain is a frequent complaint of the active and aging United States population. In a 1998 study, 2.5% of all visits to family physicians were for acute sprains and strains, and 1.8% of visits were for degenerative joint disease.5 The natural history of acute joint pain depends on the diagnosis, with many causes expected to resolve within 6 weeks to 6 months. For persons aged 65 years and older, chronic joint pain (arthritis) and musculoskeletal complaints are the leading cause of disability.6 The prevalence of a number of these complaints is listed in Table 2. Osteoarthritis is by far the most common chronic joint condition encountered by the family physician.
Prevalence of Selected Musculoskeletal Conditions6
Evaluation of the Patient with Joint Pain
Evaluation of the patient with joint pain begins with an accurate history and physical examination to determine the diagnosis, prognosis, and appropriate treatment.
History
Several key questions will help to elicit the cause of acute joint pain. The first key discrimination point is whether this pain stems from trauma. The mechanism of injury may help to delineate the specific structures involved. A history of high impact or an inability to bear weight indicates the possibility of a more severe injury, such as a fracture, dislocation, or soft tissue tear. Determination of the exact location of the pain, such as specific bony tenderness, may indicate the possibility of a fracture or avulsion of a ligament. Exceptional physical demand (high-intensity exercise or an acute increase in the frequency, duration, or intensity of the activity) may indicate a stress fracture7 instead of a sprain. Trauma in a patient who is still growing should prompt consideration of epiphyseal fracture.
In chronic joint pain, obtaining the history usually requires directed questioning. In particular, the physician should ask about onset, progression, and systemic symptoms. Although an abrupt onset is most often associated with self-limited conditions, at times rheumatic disease may appear suddenly. Progression of the joint pain should be noted. Chronic knee pain that increases abruptly may need a more intensive work-up. If several joints are involved, it may be helpful to know which were affected first. History taking should also include questions about family history of joint disease and rheumatic conditions. Many diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and gout, occur more often in patients with affected relatives.8 The absence of certain features can be reassuring. A patient may be concerned that the pain in her hands is rheumatoid arthritis; however, without involvement of the proximal interphalangeal joints, rheumatoid arthritis is unlikely.
Any history of prior injury of the same joint indicates the possibility of a recurrent problem and is thus more likely to be a chronic process instead of an acute one. Injuries that do not heal in the expected amount of time should be re-evaluated, and the differential diagnosis expanded to include more chronic and rare causes of joint pain. Atraumatic joint pain should be a reason to consider diagnoses such as rheumatic disease, degenerative disease, crystal-induced arthropathy, infection, and malignancy.
A review of systems will also assist in determining the possibility of an undiagnosed chronic condition or more serious conditions, such as infection or cancer. Specifics to be assessed include constitutional symptoms, such as unintended weight loss, unexplained fevers, chills, night sweats, unrelenting or nocturnal pain, and significant disability. A personal history of immunosuppression (whether because of disease or medication) or previous joint injection puts the patient more at risk for septic arthritis, and history of tick bite increases the chance of Lyme disease.
Whether the joint pain is chronic or acute, the presence of certain “red flags” in the history should prompt an immediate detailed workup: (1) nocturnal pain/unremitting pain; (2) systemic symptoms (eg, fever, chills, weight loss); and (3) significant disability/change in abilities.
Physical Examination
The important elements of physical examination typically include: inspection, palpation, range of motion, and special tests. It is important to determine whether the joint pain is truly articular. Bursitis and tendinitis can mimic joint pain. Swelling and ecchymosis, if marked, may indicate a fracture or complete ligament or tendon tear. Laxity, gross deformity, and tendon or muscle dysfunction (tested by resisted function) may indicate fracture or partial to complete tear of a ligament, tendon, or muscle. Crepitus indicates a derangement of bone, cartilage, or menisci.9 Sensory changes indicate possible neurological or vascular problems. If the joint volume is increased, the physician should determine whether this is tissue hypertrophy or a joint effusion. Range of motion (ROM) should be assessed as well. Increased ROM may indicate an unstable joint; decreased ROM may represent effusion, capsule fibrosis, or bony abnormality. Contractures indicate a longstanding condition. Deformity seen in the chronic setting probably represents joint erosion. In rheumatoid arthritis, the synovium lining the joint can hypertrophy, forming a doughy-feeling joint pannus. This clue can be important for early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatic disease, which may change the course of disease progression.
Examination of the entire patient, not just the affected joint, is imperative to assess for possible osteoarthritis or rheumatic processes. Associated rashes or palpable bony hypertrophy may be pathognomonic. Distribution of symptoms can give additional clues regarding the diagnosis. In rheumatoid arthritis, there are certain sentinel joints: proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, and metatarsophalangeal. Involvement of the hip, knee, distal interphalangeal joints, or carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is more suggestive of osteoarthritis.
“Red flags” (signs that should prompt an urgent work-up) on physical examination include warmth, erythema, and swelling of the joint, which, taken together, signify the need to consider such diagnoses as infection, rheumatic process, and crystal-induced arthropathy. “Yellow flags” (signs that should prompt the physician to expand the differential diagnosis) include multiple bruises, or bruises inconsistent with the patient’s explanation of the problem, and indicate the need for further investigation into the possibility of undetected abuse.
Joint Pain Triage
The two most common chronic joint pain conditions seen in the family physician’s office are osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In 1990, an estimated 20.7 million adults in the United States had moderate or severe osteoarthritis. In the same year, rheumatoid arthritis was estimated to affect 2.1 million adults.6 Although there are clear differences between rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, the diagnostic picture may be confusing, and the diseases may coexist. In one study of rheumatoid arthritis, the median time from presentation to diagnosis was 36 weeks.10 It is critical to identify inflammatory arthritis when present, because disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are available that may have a significant impact on disease progression and alter the course of the disease, and early application of these therapies seems critical.10 Because of this, some rheumatologists suggest immediate referral when inflammatory arthritis is diagnosed or suspected.
Investigations
Laboratory Studies
Rarely do laboratory studies provide the diagnosis in joint pain. Blood testing (eg, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, anti-nuclear antibody, uric acid, etc) is only useful if there is a high suspicion of a specific diagnosis. These tests have a high sensitivity, in general, but a low specificity.11,12 Rheumatoid factor, for example, provides neither the sensitivity nor the specificity to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis. In as many as 30% of cases, it is negative. In persons undergoing normal aging as well as in certain disease states, it may be positive in the absence of rheumatoid arthritis.10 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are commonly elevated in inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and septic joint, and a complete blood count may reveal anemia of chronic disease, or sometimes leukemia, which can be another cause of acute or chronic joint pain.
Arthrocentesis
Arthrocentesis is urgently indicated when there is a warm, red joint with effusion, especially when there is no history of trauma (recommendation strength C).13 Presence or absence of fever should not deter consideration of arthrocentesis because it is not a reliable indicator of a septic joint and is frequently found in patients with crystal-induced arthropathies and rheumatic processes.14 The aspirated synovial fluid should be sent for the “3 Cs”: cell count, culture (Gram stain), and crystals. Table 3 indicates the diagnoses consistent with findings on synovial fluid analysis.15 Another time to consider arthrocentesis is when a significant effusion is present. This can provide significant relief, and subsequent analysis of the fluid may provide a diagnosis.
Diagnoses Consistent with Findings From Synovial Fluid Analysis13
Diagnostic Imaging
The indications for obtaining a radiograph are gleaned through a thorough history and physical examination. Key indicators are: bony tenderness, inability to bear weight, gross deformity, skeletal immaturity (because of concern for an epiphyseal fracture in the young), and age (bone cancers are more prevalent in both the young and the old). Several features to look for on a radiograph include obvious fracture, malalignment, fat pad sign, osteophytes, erosions, and a widened epiphysis.
No single imaging technique will answer all clinical questions. If there is doubt as to which test is best to order, consultation with a radiologist is recommended. Such consultations enable the radiologist to give imaging advice quickly and accurately and to potentially lower the cost by eliminating inadequate studies.
Plain radiographs remain the screening modality of choice for most joint abnormalities. They should be performed in all cases of significant trauma, chronic pain, or suspected arthritis. However, data increasingly show that low doses of radiation in childhood increase the risk of solid tumors in late adulthood.16,17 For that reason, some radiologists recommend limiting the radiation dose in younger patients, in some instances by obtaining only 2 instead of 3 views. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could then be a choice to further evaluate the problem and limit exposure to radiation.
The diagnostic capabilities of computed tomography (CT) have increased dramatically with the advent of multidetector CT. CT is valuable in the evaluation of many extremity fractures that are not well quantified on radiograph. In addition, current generation scanners provide considerable information on soft-tissue structures, allowing the diagnosis of tendon and ligament tears, as well as soft-tissue abscesses and masses. Detail of soft-tissue structures in CT, however, remains somewhat inferior to that shown by MRI.
For clinical questions dealing primarily with soft-tissue problems, MRI is the modality of choice except in patients with indwelling metallic devices. CT is the modality of choice for imaging patients who have indwelling metal and for whom plain radiographs are not diagnostic.
Injection of iodinated contrast can be performed in conjunction with CT (CT arthrography) to provide information about hyaline cartilage, ligaments, and the joint capsule. The superior spatial resolution of CT means that CT arthrography is often preferable to MRI arthrography in the evaluation of small joints, specifically the ankle.18
MRI provides unparalleled visualization of soft-tissue abnormalities. It is especially useful for the evaluation of cartilage, muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Higher spatial resolution is possible when the examination is limited to a smaller body part. Therefore, an MRI of the wrist will in most cases have better spatial resolution than an MRI of the forearm. When possible, the referring doctor should specify the area of concern.
MRI with gadolinium injection (MRI arthrography) can be used to visualize intra-articular structures such as tendons and ligaments. MRI with or without gadolinium injection can be used to diagnose inflammatory arthritis before it is apparent on plain radiographs. Ultrasound also has been shown to be equal to MRI for this purpose.19
The cost of ultrasound is considerably lower than that of MRI. In experienced hands, the accuracy of diagnosis of rotator cuff tears by ultrasound has been demonstrated to be equal to that of MRI.20 It also has been used extensively for evaluation of tendon and ligament tears in other joints. The major limitations of ultrasound are the inability of the beam to penetrate bone, and its inability to evaluate abnormalities deep within a joint, such as menisci and cruciate ligaments.
Management of the Patient with Joint Pain
A Joint Pain Treatment Algorithm is shown in Figure 1. The algorithm divides the patient care plan into 5 working areas discussed below, and parallel consideration implies each area is addressed simultaneously.
Joint pain treatment algorithm.
Pharmacologic Therapy
Acute Joint Pain
In acute joint pain, the key is early, aggressive pain management with an equally rapid medication taper as improvement occurs. For severe pain, opioids may be required. For moderate to severe pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibitor pain medications are commonly used. For milder pain, acetaminophen may suffice. There is low risk of adverse events from short-term use of any of these medications. It is interesting that there is very little evidence on outcomes specific to acute joint pain and the short-term use of these medications,21 but there is a great deal of evidence on the safety of these medications in this scenario.22
Chronic Joint Pain
For chronic conditions, controlling pain is a key element to maintaining function. Several groups (American College of Rheumatology, American Pain Society, and American Geriatrics Society) recommend increasing or changing medications to gain adequate control of symptoms (recommendation strength B).23–25 The Joint Pain Treatment Algorithm (Figure 1) shows a “step-wise” approach to reflect this.
Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen in doses up to 4 g per day is widely recommended as a cost-effective initial therapy for osteoarthritis. Although 4- to 6-hour dosing is usual, an extended release form of acetaminophen is available to increase the interval to 8 hours. Acetaminophen is often rated as “very helpful” but discontinuance rates are higher than for nonselective NSAIDS (recommendation strength B).26 At higher doses, there are concerns about nephropathy in the form of papillary necrosis and interstitial nephritis as well as an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.2 There are also cautions about use in patients who use alcohol or have liver disease.
NSAIDs and COX-2 Inhibitors
Inflammation seems to play a role in pain and disease progression and may explain some of the success of NSAIDs and COX-2–selective inhibitors in treating pain in osteoarthritis. Current studies show similar efficacy between COX-2–selective inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDS (recommendation strength B).27 COX-2–selective inhibitors, however, have reduced gastrointestinal adverse events compared with nonselective NSAIDS. In many circumstances, starting with a nonselective NSAID is appropriate. Listed in Table 4 are certain situations in which starting with a COX-2–specific inhibitor would be recommended (recommendation strength B).27 With respect to acetaminophen in combination with NSAIDS, or COX-2–specific inhibitors, there is current epidemiologic evidence that they should not be used concurrently because of the increased risk of GI bleeding (recommendation strength B).28
COX-2–Specific Inhibitors: Relative Indications27
Opioids
There are a number of benefits in using opioids where joint pain is unresponsive to acetaminophen or NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors. At times, there are relative or absolute contraindications to the use of these medications; for example, acetaminophen in a patient with active hepatitis. The gastrointestinal side effects of opioids are well known, and a stimulant laxative recommendation should accompany each prescription at the initiation of therapy. Often, opioids may only provide a reduction in pain of 15% to 20% (recommendation strength B).27 Depending on the initial starting dose, it may be necessary to titrate the opioid dose upward. Many times the dose of opioid needed may be lower when opioids are combined with acetaminophen or NSAIDS. There is no dose ceiling on pure opioids, but there is a defined ceiling on the dosing of products combined with acetaminophen or NSAIDS based on the dose of the nonopioid medication.
Adjuvants & Concomitant Therapies—Acute Joint Pain
Adjuvant and concomitant therapies are recommended based on the diagnosis. Table 5 illustrates several of these therapies.
Adjuvant and Concomitant Therapies
Muscle relaxants in combination with NSAIDs are commonly used in the treatment of muscle spasm and injury.29 Their primary side effect is sedation.
Topical medications are very useful for the treatment of acute pain. Potential side effects include burning, stinging, and erythema. In Europe and Canada, topical NSAID preparations are available, and studies show equal efficacy with oral NSAIDs (recommendation strength B).30,31
Intra-articular injection of corticosteroid may be considered for suppression of inflammation and/or anesthetic for relief of pain. Evidence-based reviews of joint injections have found few studies to support or refute the efficacy of this procedure (recommendation strength B).32 Indications for injection include treatment of crystal-induced arthropathy, synovitis, inflammatory arthritis, and advanced osteoarthritis. Contraindications to this procedure include septic arthritis, local cellulitis, bacteremia, acute fracture, joint prosthesis, Achilles or patellar tendinopathy, and history of allergy to injectable pharmaceuticals or constituents. Potential side effects include tendon rupture, iatrogenic infection, postinjection steroid flare (self-limited pain and swelling that usually responds to ice), hypopigmentation, and soft tissue atrophy.33 Steroid injection should not be used to mask the symptoms of an acute injury, which can lead to overuse and further damage of the structure (recommendation strength C).34
Aspiration of fluid from a joint is sometimes considered for relief of pain caused by swelling, but the likelihood of re-accumulation of fluid is high.33 Aspiration is often used diagnostically to determine the cause of pain, as described previously under arthrocentesis. Injection/aspiration requires thorough knowledge of anatomy of the site.
Recommendations specific to gout include large doses of traditional NSAID medications (COX-2 medications have yet to be specifically indicated for gout) started immediately after the onset of symptoms and through 24 hours after the resolution of symptoms (recommendation strength C).35 As an alternative for those unable to take NSAIDS, steroids can be effective. Intra-articular corticosteroids are recommended if only one joint is involved, or oral steroid tapered over 8 days is recommended for multiple joints (recommendation strength C).36 Oral colchicine may also be considered in acute gout, but its efficacy is reduced if initiated more than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms. It has anti-inflammatory properties, but no analgesic effects, is not tolerated well in general, and is considered an alternative to NSAIDS.37 Allopurinol is not indicated for treatment of acute gout, and may actually precipitate a gout attack.38
In regard to infectious arthritis, specific treatment includes open or closed drainage (recommendation strength B)39 along with 2 to 6 weeks of parenteral antibiotic aimed at streptococci and staphylococci, followed by 3 to 12 weeks of oral antibiotics.40 Arthrocentesis to diagnose the specific bacteria and sensitivity to antibiotics is of paramount importance. There is no evidence that anticonvulsant drugs are effective for acute pain.41
Adjuvants—Chronic Joint Pain
Topical medications recommended by the American College of Rheumatology include capsaicin and methyl salicylate cream (recommendation strength B).23 Topical capsaicin is devoid of systemic side effects but may cause stinging or burning at the initiation of therapy.42 Methyl salicylate is a common ingredient in many “arthritis creams,” such as Ben Gay. Systemic absorption of methyl salicylate may occur and has some potential to cause salicylism when applied over abnormal skin.43
Glucosamine and chondroitin are available over the counter and have favorable side-effect profiles. Both may be used to improve osteoarthritis symptoms, although the benefit of chondroitin has not been demonstrated. In one review, 1500 mg of glucosamine was noted to have efficacy similar to 1200 mg of ibuprofen (recommendation strength B).44 Glucosamine may also slow joint space narrowing when used consistently (recommendation strength B).45
Tricyclic antidepressants and antiepileptics modulate pain signals and are effective in a variety of chronic pain syndromes even in the absence of depression. They have been minimally studied in chronic joint pain. However, where there is a neuropathic quality, the benefit is well-documented in the literature.46 Where muscle spasm is present, muscle relaxants may be of use.
Nonpharmacologic Therapies—Acute Joint Pain
Physical Modalities
Treatment using physical modalities to limit swelling and pain associated with trauma or arthritis usually consists of the components of the mnemonic PRICE:47
Protection with a brace or wrap,
Rest to avoid activities that cause pain or an increase in swelling,
Icing 15 minutes several times per day,
Compression with an elastic wrap,
Elevation of the joint above the level of the heart.
These are all potential modalities and all are not always used. For instance, it is atypical to use protection or compression for crystal-induced arthropathies, but rest and ice are measures that may reduce pain and speed recovery.38 For septic arthritis, a few days of immobilization may help limit pain but icing and elevation would usually be avoided.48
Physical therapists may provide other modalities for pain control, including: phonophoresis, iontophoresis, heat, cryotherapy, counterirritants, and/or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Massage therapy may also help relieve muscle spasm and facilitate stretching.49
Education and Behavior Changes
Education and behavior changes may be necessary to return to activity without harming the affected joint. The patient may engage in other activities to maintain strength and endurance and at the same time protect the joint. Swimming and stationary cycling are commonly recommended for lower extremity joint pain, because both activities, if done correctly, may allow for exercise without direct weight bearing. It is also critical to determine whether the activity that led to a traumatic injury was being done correctly, because changes in technique may prevent recurrent injury. Part of the education process is to give the expected time course to resolution of the pain and to advise the patient to return for evaluation if this does not occur.
Office Interventions
Several office interventions may greatly reduce pain and protect the affected joint. Taping, splinting, and casting, if appropriate, will help to immobilize the joint or minimize pain with activity. However, there is a fine distinction between the positive and negative effects of immobilization. Short-term immobilization is usually beneficial for pain control and protection, but prolonged immobilization may lead to stiffness and loss of function. With a stable joint, early gentle mobilization, usually non–weight- bearing, is recommended to prevent stiffness (recommendation strength B).50 In addition, immobilization carries with it the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which could be another reason to recommend gentle mobilization. DVT caused by immobilization has not been well studied, but is estimated in one article to occur up to 10% of the time, with more risk with increasing age, obesity, and previous DVT.51 With a stable fracture or other painful lower extremity problem, we typically recommend calf pumps 3 times per day; this theoretically helps prevent DVT; medical prophylaxis should be considered in high-risk patients.
Intra-articular injections as mentioned above may be quite effective to reduce pain and inflammation. In particular, shoulder pain resistant to treatment may respond well to a subacromial injection, thus giving the patient a window in which to pursue physical therapy to prevent adhesive capsulitis. Corticosteroids should never be injected into tendons, cartilage, or ligaments.52
Nonpharmacologic Therapies—Chronic Joint Pain
Physical Modalities
Improper or excessive exercise can hasten joint damage and increase osteoarthritis symptoms. However, a supervised walking program showed functional improvement and a decrease in arthritis pain (recommendation strength B).53 Swimming pool therapy will help limit stress on weight-bearing joints. Physical therapists can teach safe exercises to maintain strength, range of motion, and help prevent functional decline. Occupational therapy can provide assistance with orthotics and assistive devices to maintain independence. Therapists may also teach different ways to use the joint to prevent pain and further stress on the joint.
Office Interventions
Intra-articular steroid injections can provide short-term pain relief lasting several weeks (recommendation strength B).54 Nearly 80% of patients report improvement at 1 week. The clinical benefit is improved when effusion is present and aspiration of synovial fluid at the time of injection is successful (recommendation strength B).54 It is not clear that frequent injections will damage articular cartilage or the joint’s structure. In common practice, however, intra-articular steroid injections are limited to 3 to 4 per year (recommendation strength C).55
Viscosupplementation with hyaluronan is as effective as NSAIDs for improving resting pain and may provide superior relief from pain with physical activity (recommendation strength A).56 Intra- articular injections are usually completed as a series of 3 to 5 injections with benefits lasting 12 weeks or longer.56 Two hyaluronan compounds (high molecular weight and low molecular weight) with no appreciable difference in efficacy are commercially available (recommendation strength A).57 Acupuncture has also been shown to have benefits in relieving chronic symptoms in limited studies (recommendation strength B).58
Education and Behavior Changes
Education on what to expect from the disease has been shown to improve outcomes in chronic disease states, including arthritis (recommendation strength B).59,60 Behavior changes, such as positioning, work pacing, and diet leading to weight loss, may improve symptoms. Depression is often a component of a disabling illness, and psychologists or psychiatrists can help patients learn to cope with chronic disease.
Referral
Prompt referral should be made whenever there is concern about the diagnosis, discomfort in prescribing certain medications, or minimal progress with the treatment plan. When inflammatory arthritis is diagnosed or suspected, immediate referral to a rheumatologist is recommended for confirmation of diagnosis and initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists are specifically trained to help maximize physical function and quality of life if this is an issue. Significant disability should prompt referral to an orthopedic specialist for evaluation of possible joint replacement or debridement. Pain clinics may provide assistance with medication management.
Conclusions
Joint pain is a common complaint presented by patients in the family physician’s office. Appropriate evaluation should seek to identify urgencies and emergencies. A warm, red, effusion warrants consideration of arthrocentesis to make an accurate and timely diagnosis, which allows definitive treatment. Pain medications, including opioids, NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors, and acetaminophen, are used depending on the severity of the pain. In addition, NSAIDS or COX-2 inhibitors are often used in conjunction with pain medications to limit swelling, thus improving pain. Adjunctive medications may be needed for treatment of specific diagnoses. Physical modalities may help greatly with pain control by limiting motion and swelling of the affected joint. Education and behavior changes may allow the patient to continue activity in a modified fashion and to prevent reinjury.
Acknowledgments
We thank the FP-PEP group for valuable insights, Ed Bope, MD, for tireless help with organization and revisions, and Julia Crim, MD, for assistance with the radiology information.
Notes
The Family Practice Pain Education Project (FP-PEP) acknowledges an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer to Cardinal Health to produce educational materials for primary care doctors about pain management. The information provided here is the opinions and research of the family physicians who served on FP-PEP.
This work was presented in part at the 2003 American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Scientific Symposium.
References
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.