Skip to main content
Log in

A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed computer-based virtual patient (VP) cases to complement an interactive continuing medical education (CME) course that emphasizes skills practice using standardized patients (SP). Virtual patient simulations have the significant advantages of requiring fewer personnel and resources, being accessible at any time, and being highly standardized. Little is known about the educational effectiveness of these new resources. We conducted a randomized trial to assess the educational effectiveness of VPs and SPs in teaching clinical skills.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of VP cases when compared with live SP cases in improving clinical skills and knowledge.

DESIGN: Randomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five health care providers (registered nurses 45%, physicians 15%, other provider types 40%) who attended a CME program.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive either 4 live cases (n=32) or 2 live and 2 virtual cases (n=23). Other aspects of the course were identical for both groups.

RESULTS: Participants in both groups were equivalent with respect to pre-post workshop improvement in comfort level (P=.66) and preparedness to respond (P=.61), to screen (P=.79), and to care (P=.055) for patients using the skills taught. There was no difference in subjective ratings of effectiveness of the VPs and SPs by participants who experienced both (P=.79). Improvement in diagnostic abilities were equivalent in groups who experienced cases either live or virtually.

CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in performance and diagnostic ability were equivalent between the groups and participants rated VP and SP cases equally. Including well-designed VPs has a potentially powerful and efficient place in clinical skills training for practicing health care workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson MB, Kassebaum DG. Proceedings of the AAMC’s consensus conference on the use of standardized patients in the teaching and evaluation of clinical skills. Acad Med. 1993;68:437–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979;13:41–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sachdeva AK, Wolfson PJ, Blair PG, et al. Impact of a standardized patient intervention to teach breast and abdominal examination skills to third-year medical students at two institutions. Am J Surg. 1997;173:320–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roche AM, Stubbs JM, Sanson-Fischer RW, et al. A controlled trial of educational strategies to teach medical students brief intervention skills for alcohol problems. Prev Med. 1997;26:78–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGraw RC, O’Connor HM. Standardized dized patients in the early acquisition of clinical skills. Med Educ. 1999;33:572–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubal RC, Kizakevich PN, Guinn CI, Merino KD, West SL. The virtual standardized patient. Simulated patient-practitioner dialog for patient interview training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;70:133–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleetwood J, Vaught W, Feldman D, Gracely E, Kassutto Z, Novack D. MedEthEx online: a computer-based learning program in medical ethics and communication skills. Teach Learn Med. 2000 Spring;12: 96–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens A, Hernandex J, Johnsen K, et al. The Use of Virtual Patients to Teach Medical Students Communication Skills. The 2005 Association for Surgical Education Annual Meeting; 2005 April 7–10; New York, NY.

  9. McGee JB, Neill J, Goldman L, Casey E. Using multimedia virtual patients to enhance the clinical curriculum for medical students. Medinfo. 1998;9(Part 2):732–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenberg R, Loyd G, Wesley G. Integrated simulation experiences to enhance clinical education. Med Educ. 2002;36:1109–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipkin M, Kalet A, Zabar S, Triola M, Freeman R. Psychosocial Aspects of Bio-terrorism: Preparing Physicians Utilizing an Evidence-Based, Experiential Model and Multi-Modal Evaluation. The 114th American Association of Medical Colleges Annual Meeting; 2003 November 7–12; Washington, DC.

  12. Lipkin M, Cope D, Eisenman D, et al. Psychosocial aspects of bioterrorism: preparing Primary Care. The 26th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine; 2003 April 30–May 3; Vancouver, Canada.

  13. Zabar S, Kachur E, Kalet A, et al. Practicing Bioterrorism-Related Communication Skills with Standardized Patients (SPs). American Academy on Physician and Patient 2003 Teaching & Research Forum: Emerging Trends in Health Communication; 2003 October 9–12; Baltimore Maryland.

  14. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. J Am Med Assoc. 1984;252:1905–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Triola M, Feldman H, Kachur E, Holloway W, Friedman B. A novel feedback system for virtual patient interactions. In: Shortliffe E, ed. MEDINFO 2004. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Medical Informatics, 2004, San Francisco, CA. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004;1886.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kachur E, et al. Effects of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290:1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge referenced observation guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Edu. 1996;30:83–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan EJ, Bertakis KD. Development and validation of the Davis observation code. Fam Med. 1991;23:19–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox J, Mulholland H. An instrument for assessment of videotapes of general practitioners’ performance. BMJ. 1993;306:1043–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bearman M. Is virtual the same as real? Medical students’ experiences of a virtual patient. Acad Med. 2003;78:538–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bearman M, Cesnik B, Liddell M. Random comparison of ‘virtual patient’ models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills. Med Educ. 2001;35:824–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. PubMed. National Library of Medicine. Available at: http://www.pubmed.org. Accessed April 20, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Triola MD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

This work is supported under a National Health Care Workforce Development Initiative of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Association of American Medical Colleges, grant number U36/CCU319276-02-3, AAMC ID number MM-0344-03/03.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triola, M., Feldman, H., Kalet, A.L. et al. A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 424–429 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00421.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00421.x

Key words

Navigation